Parliament

Gordon Campbell | Parliament TV | Parliament Today | Video | Questions Of the Day | Search

 

Nats admit knowing ACC shouldn't be privatised

Nats admit knowing ACC shouldn't be privatised

A major independent evaluation of ACC says the world-leading cover it gives injured New Zealanders would be compromised by privatisation and National has finally admitted it knew this all along, says ACC Minister Maryan Street.

"What New Zealanders, who lodge 1.6 million ACC claims a year, need to know now is whether National will actually change its plans to privatise ACC as a result?

"The PriceWaterhouseCoopers report was commissioned by the ACC Board and released on Monday. The last major review of ACC was initiated by the incoming National government in 1990, so a stocktake of the $3.8 billion a year publicly owned scheme - was both timely and appropriate.

"The report says "the ACC under its current government monopoly structure performs as well or better than most other structures" worldwide, is often considered to be "best practice" and provides broader coverage than any other scheme in the world," Maryan Street said.

"It says the best mechanism for delivering the employers and motor vehicle accounts in New Zealand is the current government monopoly and there are strong arguments for ensuring serious injuries in all accounts are similarly catered for to optimise rehabilitation.

"National's ACC spokesperson Pany Wong says "the report tells us nothing we don't already know"! That is some admission - but this means National has been misleading voters for years.

"National has been elusive about its ACC privatisation plans through several elections and we now know this is because it was well aware they would result in slashed accident insurance cover for hundreds of thousands of people each year.

"All because it wants to line the pockets of a few insurance companies which will cream off entitlements New Zealanders would otherwise have got," Maryan Street said.

"The report examines how the scheme measures up against the Woodhouse principles on which it was founded. Labour has always supported those principles based on 24 hour, comprehensive, no fault cover for all injured New Zealanders."

"National professes to support those principles, but the report confirms what the Labour-led government has always said - that the ability to deliver on them would be seriously threatened by privatisation - in fact it can find no international examples where privatised schemes have done so," Maryan Street said.

"The report lists a string of negatives which characterise private schemes including: much higher administration costs due to profit and marketing requirements and high numbers of disputes, the use of lump sum payments instead of weekly compensation which shortchange the injured, reduced focus on vocational rehabilitation and a greater likelihood of people slipping through the gaps because of fragmented delivery.

"The cost to taxpayers of privatising the employers account alone in 1999 has been estimated at $45 million. It's about time National came clean, spelt out its policy and how it can justify the costs of privatising several accounts at significant further expense to the health and wellbeing of New Zealanders and the country's economy once and for all."

http://www.acc.co.nz/about-acc/news-information/PRD_CTRB076598

Other findings in the report.

Australia uses a mixture of state and private mechanisms to deliver some similar accident compensation services and the report finds ACC employer contributions are substantially lower at 0.78 per cent of wages, compared to an Australian average of two per cent. New Zealand motor vehicle levies are also significantly lower.

ACC clients return to work faster than their Australian counterparts and ACC has lower claim management and administration rates.

In the US, UK and several Australian states the use of lump sum payments, instead of the weekly compensation paid by ACC, generally disadvantages clients.Lump sum payments are typically used by private insurers and often fail to cover the needs of people with long-term or serious injuries in particular.

Research shows private insurers are often less concerned about the vocational rehabilitation of injured clients - and that a significant group of people can miss out on injury cover altogether under privatised schemes.

A privatised ACC scheme which tried to honour the Woodhouse principles would have to be heavily regulated to ensure insurers met their obligations and would incur administration costs which were well over 10 per cent higher than ACC's to ensure profit margins, for example, were met.

ENDS

© Scoop Media

 
 
 
 
 
Parliament Headlines | Politics Headlines | Regional Headlines

Gordon Campbell: On DHB Deficits And Free Trade

Currently the world is looking on aghast at the Trump administration’s plans to slash Obamacare, mainly in order to finance massive tax changes that will deliver most of their gains to the wealthy. Lives will be lost in the trade-off. Millions of Americans stand to lose access to the healthcare they need.

Spot the difference with New Zealand, where DHBs are under intense pressure to reduce deficits within a climate of chronic underfunding. More>>

 
 

Greens' Response: Slum-Like Rentals Exposed In Renting Review

“...The grim findings of the review are a wakeup call about the true state of rentals in this country. Too many renters are festering in slum-like conditions under the thumb of landlords who have largely unchecked powers and ignore tenants’ complaints when it suits them.” More>>

ALSO:

Gordon Campbell: On The Life And Times Of Peter Dunne

The unkind might talk of sinking ships, others could be more reminded of a loaded revolver left on the desk by his Cabinet colleagues as they closed the door behind them, now that the polls in Ohariu had confirmed he was no longer of much use to National. More>>

ALSO:

Gordon Campbell: On Labour’s Campaign Launch

One of the key motifs of Ardern’s speech was her repeated use of the phrase – “Now, what?” Cleverly, that looks like being Labour’s response to National’s ‘steady as it goes’ warning against not putting the economic ‘gains’ at risk. More>>

ALSO:

Lyndon Hood: Social Welfare, Explained

Speaking as someone who has seen better times and nowadays mostly operates by being really annoying and humiliating to deal with, I have some fellow feeling with the current system, so I’ll take this chance to set a few things straight.. More>>

ALSO:

Deregistered: Independent Board Decision On Family First

The Board considers that Family First has a purpose to promote its own particular views about marriage and the traditional family that cannot be determined to be for the public benefit in a way previously accepted as charitable... More>>

ALSO:

Transport Policies: Nats' New $10.5bn Roads Of National Significance

National is committing to the next generation of Roads of National Significance, National Party Transport Spokesperson Simon Bridges says. More>>

ALSO:

 
 
 
 
 
 

LATEST HEADLINES

  • PARLIAMENT
  • POLITICS
  • REGIONAL
 
 

Featured InfoPages

Opening the Election