Parliament

Gordon Campbell | Parliament TV | Parliament Today | Video | Questions Of the Day | Search

 

Former oilman, turned MP, speaks out on oil prices

Gordon Copeland Press Release
For Immediate Release
Monday, 12th May 2008

Former oilman, turned MP, speaks out on oil prices

Independent MP Gordon Copeland, the Kiwi Party spokesperson on Commerce, today added his voice to the growing chorus of concern about the increasing price of petrol and diesel.

“In some ways, I am perhaps uniquely qualified to comment on this issue,” said Mr Copeland. “I spent fourteen years in the oil industry – seven of them with BP – in both London and New Zealand.”

Gordon Copeland was the Chief Financial Officer of BP in New Zealand and a Director of the New Zealand Refining Company in Whangärei until May of 1980.

“The rapid increase in the international price of oil in 2008 is very similar to the situation which existed in the late 1970s and early 1980s.”

“I think the Automobile Association and others are right to be distrustful of the recent enormous surge in oil company profits when it goes hand in hand with increasing prices at the pump.”

“Normally in business it is the other way round. If, for example, the price of steel goes up, and with it the price of cars, then the car companies margins get squeezed because their sales drop away. So why does it operate differentially when it comes to oil?”

“Part of the answer if that unlike cars, the demand for oil is inelastic. In addition though, the oil companies argue that they must immediately generate extra cash at the pump when oil moves from say $80 per barrel, to $100 per barrel, to pay the extra $20 needed.”

“However, even some executives in the oil industry itself, have qualms of conscience about that extra $20 coming immediately from the customer. They argue that funds should also be sourced from new capital. That is because when the price of oil goes up, the value of inventories and the size of the company also increase. The increase in the value of the inventories could therefore be financed from new debt or equity rather than through an immediate increase in the price at the pump.”

“A subsequent drop in price from $100 to $80 would then reduce the cash requirement at which point the price at the pump could come down immediately, and capital could be repaid.”

“In light of the above, it is interesting to look at Shell International’s first quarter 2008 results.”

“Their profit rose to $US 9.1 billion – up by $1.8 billion or 25%, from $US 7.3 billion for the equivalent quarter in 2007. However sales volume rose by just 7%. Inventories, reflecting the higher value of oil, rose from $US24 billion to $US32.2 billion; an increase of $US8.2 billion or 34.2%.”

“So did Shell fund all of the price increase from their customers or raise new capital through borrowings or new shares?”

“In fact, they borrowed not one extra cent! Their debt which stood at $US19.4 billion on 31st of March 2007, decreased slightly to $US19.3 billion a year later. This decrease in debt, coupled with the enormous surge in profit over the same period, actually reduced the company’s gearing ratio from 14.6% (debt as a percentage of debt plus equity) to just 12.7% a year later. At the same time, the company’s total equity surged from $US 113.5 billion in March 2007 to a whopping $US 133.2 billion 12 months later, and that was after repurchasing $US1.3 billion worth of shares and paying a handsome $US2.3 billion dividend!”

“It seems clear to me that the ‘let’s whack it all on to the price at the pump’ brigade is well and truly in charge at Shell. The ‘it would be fairer to raise new capital’ people in the company (assuming they exist at all) didn’t get a look in!”

“New Zealand is at the end of the oil supply chain, so there is little we can do, but the international community needs to call the oil giants to account on this issue.”

ENDS

© Scoop Media

 
 
 
 
 
Parliament Headlines | Politics Headlines | Regional Headlines

Not Easy: Gordon Campbell On The Greens’ Ongoing Problems

Hard to treat the Greens’ belated decision to stand a candidate in Ohariu as being anything other than a desperation move, by a party whose own leadership is evidently concerned about its chances of survival...

A few months ago, the Greens felt able to forego that role in Ohariu in order to help a beleaguered Labour Party get its candidate Greg O’Connor across the line, and knock Peter Dunne out of the parliamentary frame. More>>

 

Gordon Campbell: On DHB Deficits And Free Trade

Currently the world is looking on aghast at the Trump administration’s plans to slash Obamacare, mainly in order to finance massive tax changes that will deliver most of their gains to the wealthy. Lives will be lost in the trade-off. Millions of Americans stand to lose access to the healthcare they need... More>>

Greens' Response: Slum-Like Rentals Exposed In Renting Review

“...The grim findings of the review are a wakeup call about the true state of rentals in this country. Too many renters are festering in slum-like conditions under the thumb of landlords who have largely unchecked powers and ignore tenants’ complaints when it suits them.” More>>

ALSO:

Gordon Campbell: On The Life And Times Of Peter Dunne

The unkind might talk of sinking ships, others could be more reminded of a loaded revolver left on the desk by his Cabinet colleagues as they closed the door behind them, now that the polls in Ohariu had confirmed he was no longer of much use to National. More>>

ALSO:

Gordon Campbell: On Labour’s Campaign Launch

One of the key motifs of Ardern’s speech was her repeated use of the phrase – “Now, what?” Cleverly, that looks like being Labour’s response to National’s ‘steady as it goes’ warning against not putting the economic ‘gains’ at risk. More>>

ALSO:

Lyndon Hood: Social Welfare, Explained

Speaking as someone who has seen better times and nowadays mostly operates by being really annoying and humiliating to deal with, I have some fellow feeling with the current system, so I’ll take this chance to set a few things straight.. More>>

ALSO:

Deregistered: Independent Board Decision On Family First

The Board considers that Family First has a purpose to promote its own particular views about marriage and the traditional family that cannot be determined to be for the public benefit in a way previously accepted as charitable... More>>

ALSO:

Transport Policies: Nats' New $10.5bn Roads Of National Significance

National is committing to the next generation of Roads of National Significance, National Party Transport Spokesperson Simon Bridges says. More>>

ALSO:

 
 
 
 
 
 

LATEST HEADLINES

  • PARLIAMENT
  • POLITICS
  • REGIONAL
 
 

Featured InfoPages

Opening the Election