Gordon Campbell | Parliament TV | Parliament Today | Video | Questions Of the Day | Search


King: Third reading, Criminal Procedure Bill

20 June, 2008
Third reading, Criminal Procedure Bill

I move that the Criminal Procedure Bill be now read for a third time.

The Criminal Procedure Bill was introduced in June 2004 by my colleague, Hon Phil Goff. It is an omnibus Bill that amends the Crimes Act, the Summary Proceedings Act, the District Courts Act, and the Juries Act. It also creates a new Criminal Disclosure Act.

The overall purpose of the amendments is to maximise efficiency and fairness in the criminal justice system. Victims will benefit from a number of reforms in the Bill.

The Bill responds to Law Commission recommendations and developments overseas. Many of the areas included in this Bill have not seen fundamental reform for many years. The rules have not kept pace with changes in society (including changes in technology) and reform in other common law countries.

Major areas of reform included in the Bill are changes relating to jury trials, exceptions to the double jeopardy rule and reforms to preliminary hearings and disclosure. There are also reforms affecting “middle-band” offences. I will briefly outline some of the key reforms in each of these areas.


The Bill proposes to introduce 11:1 majority verdicts instead of the current unanimity requirement. There are a number of reasons for this change. It helps to address the problem of rogue jurors, who refuse to participate in deliberations and produce a hung jury for reasons outside the merits of the case.

Another reason is to prevent a single juror from being pressured by the other 11 to return a verdict against his or her conscience. The outcome will therefore be a more honest result. The change will also make jury tampering by bribery or intimidation more difficult for organised criminals to achieve.

As a result all those involved in jury trials, including jurors, witnesses and victims, will benefit.

A large number of amendments are made to the Juries Act 1981 to improve the administration of jury service and recognise the consequences that jury service has on people fulfilling this important role.

In addition to those Juries Act amendments, other reforms in the Crimes Act allow Judge alone trials where the trial is likely to be long and complex and in cases involving juror intimidation. These reforms will ensure fairer trial process and reduce the prospect of people serving as jurors for unreasonably long periods.

Double Jeopardy

The Bill also creates two exceptions to the double jeopardy rule, which currently provides that a person can only be tried once for an offence.

The first exception is where the accused has committed an administration of justice offence that results in his or her acquittal, a “tainted acquittal”. Administration of justice offences includes offences such as perjury, bribery of a judicial officer and fabricating evidence. This change will ensure that those who use such tactics cannot benefit from this wrongdoing.

The second exception is where there is “new and compelling evidence” not available at the time of the first trial that indicates that the accused committed the offence of which he or she was acquitted. If such evidence surfaces after trial and acquittal, the person can be brought to justice.

This exception is subject to a number of safeguards including that it only applies to serious criminal offences such as murder and rape. In addition, the evidence must not have been available at the time of the first trial, the evidence must be reliable, and consent must be sought (from either the Solicitor-General or the Court of Appeal) to proceed to different stages in a case where compelling new evidence is in issue.

The reforms to the double jeopardy rule will benefit victims and society as a whole in ensuring that criminals are brought to justice.

Middle-band offences

An amendment to the Bill added by the Law and Order Committee permits changes to be made to the middle-band offences by way of Order in Council rather than the need for District Courts Act to be amended. This will enable Class A drug offences to be put into the middle band and dealt with by District Courts rather than the High Court. This would ease pressure in the High Court arising from the significant volume of methamphetamine cases.

It should not be assumed that the High Court will send all such cases to the District Courts. I am confident that the High Court will use this power with discretion to ensure that the pressure that exists in the High Court is not simply transferred to the District Courts. Appropriate protocols will need to be developed to ensure this process is administered in a manageable way.

Preliminary Hearings

The third major area of reform is the replacement of oral preliminary hearings with committal on the basis of formal written statements, unless the court orders an oral hearing. These hearings are largely redundant and they require victims and other witnesses to duplicate their court appearances. This, in turn, is stressful and unduly demanding.

As recent cases demonstrate, this is especially so for victims and family members faced with the daunting prospect of having to recount painful experiences at a trial, having already been required to do so at a preliminary hearing.

The Bill provides a standard pre-jury trial procedure under which the parties present their evidence in the form of written statements, with automatic committal for trial unless either party applies for an oral hearing.

We are all aware that this Bill has had a protracted journey from introduction to its final reading. However, the Government SOP developed in consultation with my colleagues in the National party has paved the way to successfully progressing this legislation.

The amendments effected by the SOP give the parties the right to make oral submissions in support of an application for an oral evidence order. Further, it requires the new committal process in the Bill to be reviewed by the Solicitor-General, or a nominated person, as soon as practicable after it has been in operation for 2 years.

Criminal Disclosure

To complement the removal of preliminary hearings, the Bill creates a new Criminal Disclosure Act which provides a comprehensive regime of prosecution pre-trial disclosure in criminal proceedings. This single and easily accessible statute will replace the current arrangements where prosecution pre-trial disclosure is regulated by a mixture of case law and statutory rules under the Official Information and Privacy Acts.

I would like to thank the Law Commission for its work in this area. I would also like to thank the Law and Order Committee who considered this Bill, and those who made submissions on the Bill to that Committee.

I look forward to this Bill enhancing the efficient management of criminal proceedings, while ensuring maximum fairness for everyone involved.

I am pleased to commend this Bill to the House.


© Scoop Media

Parliament Headlines | Politics Headlines | Regional Headlines

Gordon Campbell: On Why Labour Isn’t Responsible For Barnaby Joyce

As a desperate Turnbull government tries to treat the Barnaby Joyce affair as a Pauline Hanson fever dream – blame it on the foreigners! We’re the victims of the dastardly New Zealand Labour Party! – our own government has chosen to further that narrative, and make itself an accomplice.

Evidently, the National government is similarly desperate for anything that might discredit or derail the Ardern juggernaut, even if that means throwing Internal Affairs Minister Peter Dunne under a bus More>>


Treaty: Agreement In Principle Signed With Moriori

“The Crown acknowledges Moriori was left virtually landless from 1870, hindering its cultural, social and economic development. The Crown also acknowledges its contribution to the myths that the people of Moriori were racially inferior and became extinct." More>>


Susan Devoy: Call For Inquiry Into State Abuse Reaches UN

Race Relations Commissioner Dame Susan Devoy is in Geneva and has asked a United Nations committee to urge the New Zealand government to initiate an inquiry into the physical and sexual abuse of children and disabled people held in state institutions. More>>


(Not National): Cross-Party Agreement On Pike River Re-Entry

The commitment was signed this afternoon by the leaders of Labour, United Future, The Maori Party, and the Green Party and, together with the earlier commitment by New Zealand First, means that there is now a Parliamentary majority behind the families’ fight for truth and justice. More>>



Mental Health Foundation: 'Positive First Steps'

“The heavy reliance on pilots and targeted approaches in the package announced today makes it plain that additional funding will be needed so that activities that work can be made available throughout New Zealand,” says Mr Robinson. More>>


'Gift' To NZ: Synod Considers Third Christchurch Cathedral Option

Members of the Anglican Diocese of Christchurch will consider three, not two, options regarding the future of the ChristChurch Cathedral... The new option is for the Synod to gift the Cathedral building to the Government for the people of New Zealand. More>>


PM's Presser: Labour's Water Policy 'Reckless', Says English

The Labour Party has "bumbled into" its policy to charge for water in a "reckless" way that would put a Labour-led government on a collision course with both Maori and other water users, Prime Minister Bill English said at his weekly post-Cabinet press conference.. More>>





Featured InfoPages

Opening the Election