Parliament

Gordon Campbell | Parliament TV | Parliament Today | Video | Questions Of the Day | Search

 

Cosgrove: Bail law changes all about slogans

12 December 2008 Media Statement

Cosgrove: Bail law changes all about slogans and posturing, not substance and protection


Labour law and order spokesperson Clayton Cosgrove says the National Government is rushing through bail law changes that amount to “nothing more than smoke and mirrors.”

Mr Cosgrove says: “National’s plan to repeal the 2007 Amendment to the Bail Act is not about making New Zealand communities safer. The change is all about National trying to pretend to New Zealanders that it is tough on crime. New Zealanders as a whole will not feel safer as a result of this Bill if it is passed,” he said.

“If National really was tough on crime, it would be moving decisively to implement Labour’s legislation to ensure criminals serve two-thirds of their sentences before getting parole.

“Instead it is posturing on bail law changes, knowing full well that only a handful of alleged offenders, about 75 on the muster according to what John Key said this week, may be denied bail under its changes. In fact, according to the briefing Justice gave Labour, only 10 more remand beds will be needed next year. To put that in perspective, over 15,000 are remanded in custody each year.”

Mr Cosgrove said the Labour Government amended the Bail Act in 2007 simply to respond sensibly to a series of judicial decisions. “The amendment clarified the previous law to ensure that where there is ‘real and significant’ risk to the community bail should be denied.

“The amended law did not make it easier to get bail, as National claims. The reality is that the percentage of violent offenders who offended while on bail declined steadily under Labour, as acknowledged by National in its Bill.

“National’s misleading claims are also certainly not supported by remand figures. The remand prisoner population grew by about 30 percent from 2004 to 2008.”

Mr Cosgrove said National had already begun posturing on law and order issues. “As every week of its administration passes, it will be forced to posture more and more. Law and order and safer communities cannot be achieved by slogans. National will soon discover that, if it is not blinded by its own rhetoric.”

Background information

The Labour Government’s intention in the 2007 Bail Amendment Act was to clarify the law and to respond to a number of judicial decisions, rather than make any significant changes.

The new law clarified the level of risk required before an alleged offender was remanded in custody, as being “real and significant.” Labour believed that the references to “risk” were previously too vague and should be clarified.

The “real and significant” threshold was chosen by examining judicial decisions on the previous “risk” threshold, especially in the Court of Appeal’s 2002 decision in R v Hines (CA384/02, 29 November 2002).

In R v Hines, the Court of Appeal implicitly agreed with the High Court that to amount to just cause for continued detention, the risk that a defendant may interfere with a witness should be “more than nebulous and insignificant and should be a real and significant risk”.

In line with Hines, Labour’s legislation consistently provided that the threshold in section 8 (1) be clarified by providing that “a risk” of the defendant not answering bail, interfering with witnesses or other evidence, or offending while on bail, means a “real and significant risk”.

The R v Kahui (High Court) case was one of the first decisions after Labour’s changes came into force. In that case, Justice Heath stated that the change to a ‘real and significant risk’ does “not seem to me to put the test any higher than it was under the previous legislation, but rather to emphasise the need for a proper inference to be drawn from proven facts; as opposed to the Court engaging in speculation or guesswork about the possibility of risk.”

ENDS

© Scoop Media

 
 
 
 
 
Parliament Headlines | Politics Headlines | Regional Headlines

Gordon Campbell: On DHB Deficits And Free Trade

Currently the world is looking on aghast at the Trump administration’s plans to slash Obamacare, mainly in order to finance massive tax changes that will deliver most of their gains to the wealthy. Lives will be lost in the trade-off. Millions of Americans stand to lose access to the healthcare they need.

Spot the difference with New Zealand, where DHBs are under intense pressure to reduce deficits within a climate of chronic underfunding. More>>

 
 

Greens' Response: Slum-Like Rentals Exposed In Renting Review

“...The grim findings of the review are a wakeup call about the true state of rentals in this country. Too many renters are festering in slum-like conditions under the thumb of landlords who have largely unchecked powers and ignore tenants’ complaints when it suits them.” More>>

ALSO:

Gordon Campbell: On The Life And Times Of Peter Dunne

The unkind might talk of sinking ships, others could be more reminded of a loaded revolver left on the desk by his Cabinet colleagues as they closed the door behind them, now that the polls in Ohariu had confirmed he was no longer of much use to National. More>>

ALSO:

Gordon Campbell: On Labour’s Campaign Launch

One of the key motifs of Ardern’s speech was her repeated use of the phrase – “Now, what?” Cleverly, that looks like being Labour’s response to National’s ‘steady as it goes’ warning against not putting the economic ‘gains’ at risk. More>>

ALSO:

Lyndon Hood: Social Welfare, Explained

Speaking as someone who has seen better times and nowadays mostly operates by being really annoying and humiliating to deal with, I have some fellow feeling with the current system, so I’ll take this chance to set a few things straight.. More>>

ALSO:

Deregistered: Independent Board Decision On Family First

The Board considers that Family First has a purpose to promote its own particular views about marriage and the traditional family that cannot be determined to be for the public benefit in a way previously accepted as charitable... More>>

ALSO:

Transport Policies: Nats' New $10.5bn Roads Of National Significance

National is committing to the next generation of Roads of National Significance, National Party Transport Spokesperson Simon Bridges says. More>>

ALSO:

 
 
 
 
 
 

LATEST HEADLINES

  • PARLIAMENT
  • POLITICS
  • REGIONAL
 
 

Featured InfoPages

Opening the Election