Hon David Carter
Minister of Agriculture

14 August 2009
Media Statement

Drought costs NZ $2.8 billion

Agriculture Minister David Carter has revealed that the nationwide drought between spring 2007 and autumn 2008 cost the New Zealand economy $2.8 billion.

A Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry report outlining the effects of the 2007-2008 drought shows that the total cost to the New Zealand primary sector from the drought was $1.9 billion on-farm and $900 million off-farm.

Regional and National Impacts of the 2008 Drought uses farm modelling to compare forecast budgets with actual outcomes for each sector. The Waikato was the worst-affected region, followed by Manawatu/Wanganui and Taranaki.

“The sheer size of the economic impact of this drought reflects just how important the primary sector is to the New Zealand economy”, said Mr Carter.

Major impacts of the drought included reduced quality of stock going into the 2008/09 breeding season, reduced quantity of milk from dairy farms and increased costs from buying in supplementary feed.

Mr Carter said that with extreme weather patterns increasing farmers need to plan drought recovery and should familiarise themselves with the assistance available for adverse events.

“Not having a plan is planning to do nothing,” said Mr Carter.

The full Regional and National Impacts of the 2008 Drought report is available at http://www.maf.govt.nz/mafnet/rural-nz/emergency-management/droughts/

ENDS

© Scoop Media

Arguably Reassuring: Inspector-General Finds GCSB "Arguably" Legal

Of the 88 individuals:

• 15 cases involving 22 individuals did not have any information intercepted by GCSB.

• another four cases involving five individuals were the subjects of a New Zealand Security Intelligence Service warrant and the GCSB assisted in the execution of the warrants. The Inspector-General is of the view that there were arguably no breaches and the law is unclear.

• the Bureau only provided technical assistance which did not involve interception of communications, involving three of the individuals, so no breach occurred.

• the remaining cases involved the collection of metadata, and the Inspector-General formed the view that there had arguably been no breach, noting once again that the law is unclear.
More>>