Gordon Campbell | Parliament TV | Parliament Today | Video | Questions Of the Day | Search

 


Ross Sea protected area: for science or commercial fishing?

30 October 2012

Ross Sea protected area: for science or commercial fishing?

The Green Party is encouraged by reports New Zealand and the United States have finally agreed to a joint proposal for a marine protected area in Antarctica’s Ross Sea, but want to know the details.

The two countries initially submitted separate proposals to the Commission for the Conservation of Antarctic Marine Living Resources (CCAMLR) which is meeting in Hobart, Australia this week.

“A joint US-NZ proposal is an important step forward to protecting the Ross Sea the most pristine ocean in the world. However, we are concerned about the yet-to-be-released details of the proposal,” said Green Party oceans spokesperson Gareth Hughes.

“Although the marine protected area is reportedly 2.2 million square kilometres, it is disappointing that only 1.6 million of these will be a no-take area, which is smaller than the no-take areas in each of the initial proposals put forth by the United States and New Zealand Governments.

“We are concerned that 600,000 square kilometres of marine protected area have been reportedly labelled a ‘special research zone’ which would allow for ‘light fishing’.

“What we don’t want to see in the Ross Sea marine protected area is a back-door commercial fishery akin to Japan’s so-called ‘scientific whaling’.

“If the ‘light fishing’ will be for scientific purposes then it should be funded by governments and conducted by scientists, not fishing companies.

“The Green Party hopes that all parties to CCAMLR will agree to a marine protected area for the Ross Sea that proves to be an effective protected area, not one that allows for commercial fishing under the guise of science.

“The Ross Sea is the least impacted ocean on the planet and is of tremendous ecological, conservation and scientific importance to current and future generations,” said Mr Hughes.

© Scoop Media

 
 
 
 
 
Parliament Headlines | Politics Headlines | Regional Headlines

 

PARLIAMENT TODAY:

Arming Police: Frontline Police To Routinely Carry Tasers

"In making the decision, the Police executive has considered almost five years worth of 'use of force' data… It consistently shows that the Taser is one of the least injury-causing tactical options available when compared with other options, with a subject injury rate of just over one per cent for all deployments." More>>

ALSO:

Gordon Campbell: On D-Day For Dairy At The TPP

While New Zealand may feel flattered at being called “the Saudi Arabia of milk” it would be more accurate to regard us as the suicide bombers of free trade. More>>

ALSO:

Leaked Letter: Severe Restrictions on State Owned Enterprises

Even an SOE that exists to fulfil a public function neglected by the market or which is a natural monopoly would nevertheless be forced to act "on the basis of commercial considerations" and would be prohibited from discriminating in favour of local businesses in purchases and sales. Foreign companies would be given standing to sue SOEs in domestic courts for perceived departures from the strictures of the TPP... More>>

ALSO:

"Gutted" Safety Bill: Time To Listen To Workplace Victims’ Families

Labour has listened to the families of whose loved ones have been killed at work and calls on other political parties to back its proposals to make workplaces safer and prevent unnecessary deaths on the job. More>>

ALSO:

Regulators: Govt To ‘Crowd-Source’ Regulatory Advice

A wide-ranging set of reforms is to be implemented to shake up the way New Zealand government agencies develop, write and implement regulations. More>>

ALSO:

Board Appointments: Some Minister Appoint Less The 3 In 10 Women

“It’s 2015 not 1915: Ministers who appoint less than 3 in 10 women to their boards must do better, they have no excuse but to do better,” said Dr Blue. More>>

Gordon Campbell: On The 1990s Retro Proposals For Our Health System

As we learned yesterday, the reviews propose that the democratically elected representation on DHBs should be reduced, such that community wishes will be able to be over-ridden by political appointees. In today’s revelations, the reviews also propose a return to the destructive competitive health model of the 1990s. More>>

ALSO:

Get More From Scoop

 

LATEST HEADLINES

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Parliament
Search Scoop  
 
 
Powered by Vodafone
NZ independent news