Richard Prosser MP
Spokesperson for Police
6 December 2012

Firearms Bill Puts Public And Police At Risk

New Zealand First says the flawed Arms (Military Style Semi-automatic Firearms and Import Controls) Amendment Bill, which passed its third reading in Parliament today will make the country a more dangerous place.

Police spokesperson Richard Prosser says the Bill will allow unlicensed 18-year olds to buy realistic replica firearms after the Government rejected his amendment which would have plugged the loophole.

“We have one incident a week where an idiot points a replica firearm at a police officer who has no way of knowing whether the gun is real or not.

“A full-scale firearms incident often ensues with the very real possibility that someone will get shot.”

Mr Prosser was also critical of regulation-making powers in the Bill which could see some firearms owners forced to dispose of powerful semi-automatic weapons because re-classification of certain rifles would mean they were no longer legal under the owners’ existing class of licence.

“There is a danger these firearms could find their way into the underworld.

“It goes to show that this Bill has been crafted by people who simply do not understand firearms or the realities surrounding their use,” says Mr Prosser.

nzfirst.org.nz | twitter.com/winstonpeters | facebook.com/winstonpeters

ENDS

© Scoop Media

Arguably Reassuring: Inspector-General Finds GCSB "Arguably" Legal

Of the 88 individuals:

• 15 cases involving 22 individuals did not have any information intercepted by GCSB.

• another four cases involving five individuals were the subjects of a New Zealand Security Intelligence Service warrant and the GCSB assisted in the execution of the warrants. The Inspector-General is of the view that there were arguably no breaches and the law is unclear.

• the Bureau only provided technical assistance which did not involve interception of communications, involving three of the individuals, so no breach occurred.

• the remaining cases involved the collection of metadata, and the Inspector-General formed the view that there had arguably been no breach, noting once again that the law is unclear.
More>>