Ruth

DYSON

Internal Affairs Spokesperson

22 January 2012 MEDIA STATEMENT
Bumper year for casinos - bad news for Kiwis

News that New Zealand casinos had a bumper year should serve as a warning to the Government says Labour’s Internal Affairs spokesperson Ruth Dyson.

In the past year, $509 million was lost through gambling at casinos - an eight per cent increase.

“When gambling profits grow, we can pretty fairly infer that vulnerable individuals and their families are suffering,” Ruth Dyson said.

The Government has put the rise in profits down to Sky City’s expansion and the Christchurch Casino’s reopening.

“Casinos are one of the few industries doing well at the moment, and are also one of the few industries that the Government is prepared to support and subsidise.

“What we know is people are spending money they don’t have in an effort to get ahead. If the Government’s dodgy deal with Sky City gets ticked-off there will be even more Kiwis doing that.

“It was the National government that promised a ‘brighter future’ - Kiwis shouldn’t need to turn to casinos for hope.

“There are plenty of business ventures in New Zealand that deserve government backing. Increasing the number of poky machines at a casino isn’t one of them,” Ruth Dyson said.

ENDS

© Scoop Media

Public Address Link:
A (Sweary) Analysis Of Urgency Abuse And
The Consititution

Keith Ng: You’re looking at the Regulatory Impact Statement (RIS) for the Public Health and Disability Amendment Bill. Basically, the courts said that the Government had to pay family members who looked after people with disabilities (because not doing so was discriminatory), so the Government passed this law to say: “Yeah nah.”

The RIS isn’t just redacted for the public – it was redacted for MPs. *Parliament* voted on this, with all the relevant facts blacked out.

Sure, it’s understandable, right? If you’re passing a law that’s really dodgy, you don’t want advice from civil servants saying “uh, this is pretty illegal” to be public. But actually, that’s not really a problem here, because in the same piece of legislation, THEY SAID THEY CAN’T BE TAKEN TO COURT. More>>