Gordon Campbell | Parliament TV | Parliament Today | Video | Questions Of the Day | Search

 


Another nail in the coffin of asset sales con

27 May 2013

Another nail in the coffin of asset sales con

The release of Treasury’s definition of who was a ‘retail investor’ in the sale of Mighty River Power shares is a further nail in the coffin of National’s myth that it was selling shares to ordinary Kiwi ‘mums and dads’, Green Party Co-leader Dr Russel Norman said today.

The definition, released to Newstalk ZB, shows that ‘retail investors’ “include companies, trusts or New Zealand investment institutions” and, contrary to the impression given by government ministers, was not limited to individual New Zealanders. This follows the release of Green Party research, confirmed by Treasury, showing that half the retail shares went to just 13,000 people and organisations, with just 400 receiving 10 percent of the retail shares sold.

“This is another nail in the coffin of National’s asset sales con,” said Dr Norman.

“National said that 113,000 ‘mums and dads’ had bought Mighty River Power shares. Now, we learn that companies, trusts, and financial institutions were counted by National as ‘mums and dads’.

“First, less than half the number of retail investors that the Government expected showed up to by Mighty River Power shares. Then, we learned that half the retail shares had gone to just 13,000 people and organisations investing $35,000 each and 10 percent went to 400 who put in nearly a quarter of a million dollars each on average. Now, it has been revealed that many of the ‘mum and dad’ investors weren’t actually individual Kiwis at all.

“National said that it was going to sell these assets to ordinary New Zealanders. That was always a con, and the facts prove it.

“How many ordinary New Zealanders actually bought shares in Mighty River, and what portion of the company do they own? Does John Key even know?

“What’s clear is that the asset sales are a failure in National’s own terms. Most shares aren’t being bought by ordinary average Kiwis; they’re being bought by trusts, financiers, and foreign investors.

“Any further asset sales will only be worse in this regard because Mighty River Power has already given New Zealanders a chance to buy into a partially-privatised electricity company and they overwhelmingly rejected it. If ordinary Kiwis didn’t want to buy into Mighty River Power, who’s going to buy Meridian?

“National should listen to the people of New Zealand, who have opposed asset sales from Day One, and cancel the rest of its privatisation agenda,” said Dr Norman.

ends

© Scoop Media

 
 
 
 
 
Parliament Headlines | Politics Headlines | Regional Headlines

 

Plain Packs Plan: Gordon Campbell On Tobacco Politicking (And The TPP Death Watch)

Has Act leader David Seymour got the easiest job in the world, or what? Roll out of bed, turn on the radio and hmm…there do seem to be a lot of problems out there in the world. Must think of something. And so it came to pass that this morning, David Seymour took up his sword and shield to fight for a world that’s about to be denied the rich and vibrant beauty of tobacco advertising. More>>

ALSO:

.


RECENT TPP MEETING:

Professor Ian Shirley: The Budget That Failed Auckland

The 2016 budget offered Auckland nothing in the way of vision or hope and it continued the National Government’s threats against the Auckland Council. Threatening the Council with over-riding its democratic processes if it fails to release land for housing is a bullying tactic aimed at diverting attention away from the fundamental problems with housing in the region. More>>

ALSO:

PM's Post Cab Presser: Budgets, Trusts And Pacific Diplomacy

Today Prime Minister John Key summarised last week’s budget and provided further detail about his upcoming trip to Fiji. He said that there has been “plenty going on” in the last couple of weeks and emphasised the need for Auckland council to facilitate more housing supply. More>>

ALSO:

Max Rashbrooke: A Failure Of Measurement: Inside The Budget Lock-Up

Shortly after the embargo lifted at 2pm news organisations started filing reports claiming that health, and to a lesser extent housing and education, were the ‘big winners’ out of the Budget. It failed to take into account the fact that in most cases the apparent increases were in fact cuts. Because of the twin effects of inflation and population. More>>

ALSO:

DOCtored Figures: Minister Clarifies DOC Budget

“Commentators have overlooked the fact $20.7m of that perceived shortfall is new funding for Battle for our Birds 2016, provided for in last week’s Budget...” DOC also has approval in principle to carry over a further $20m to 16/17 due to unexpected delays in a number of projects. More>>

ALSO:

For The Birds: Gordon Campbell On The Budget

Budgies, so their Wikipedia page says, are popular pets around the world due to their small size, low cost, and ability to mimic human speech. Which is a reasonably good description of Finance Minister Bill English eighth Budget. . More>>

Max Rashbrooke On The 2016 Budget

The best label for this year’s announcement by Bill English might be the ‘Bare Minimum Budget’. It does the bare minimum to defuse potential political damage in a range of areas – homelessness and health are prime among them – but almost nothing to address the country’s most deep-rooted, systemic social problems. Indeed the Budget hints that these problems may get worse. More>>

ALSO:

Gordon Campbell: On Bank Scandals (And Air Crashes)

Last month, the Australian Securities and Investment Commission (ASIC) filed proceedings against Westpac over activities that have some distinct echoes of the Libor scandal. More>>

Get More From Scoop

 

LATEST HEADLINES

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Parliament
Search Scoop  
 
 
Powered by Vodafone
NZ independent news