Gordon Campbell | Parliament TV | Parliament Today | Video | Questions Of the Day | Search

 


Minister buying needless fight with local authorities

Maryan Street
Environment Spokesperson

4 July 2013

Minister buying needless fight with local authorities

If Amy Adams is going to take the heavy handed option of legislating against local councils’ ability to restrict genetically modified organisms in food production, she is buying an unnecessary fight, says Labour’s Environment spokesperson, Maryan Street.

“The Minister would be better to work with councils and local authorities around the country to ensure that there is either agreement that the national level legislation provides sufficient protection, or agreement on changes for improved protection, specifically around the use of GMOs in the food chain.

“Following the 2001 Royal Commission into genetic modification the Labour Government put in a robust regime to prevent genetically modified products getting into the New Zealand food system. This left open the prospect of local councils imposing more stringent requirements on the release of genetically modified products. We supported that position then and we support it now.

“While the existing regulatory regime deals with the safety of GMOs in the food chain, it doesn’t address the broader issue of whether such a move is in the best interests of our food industry - by enhancing our 100% pure brand.

“This is not something which can or should be done on a territorial authority by territorial authority basis. Over the last 10 years a consensus has begun to develop that certifying products as GE-free is good for the New Zealand food industry and the economy. We don’t need genetic modification to produce high quality food. That is what we already do supremely well.

“It is also true that increasingly, people are refusing to buy genetically modified food, so why would we want to produce it? We should be using our GE-free status in food production to market ourselves to the world as a GE-free food producer which consumers can trust.

“We must ensure that producers of food products can protect their GE-free branding and the market edge that gives us.

“Amy Adams should be working with regions such as Northland, Auckland, Hawke’s Bay and the Bay of Plenty which want to protect their reputation for their quality produce, not threatening them with legal restraints.

“People are concerned about the food we produce and these local bodies are trying to do the right thing by their people and their producers. The Minister should listen more closely to them instead of trying to run them over,” said Maryan Street.

ENDS

© Scoop Media

 
 
 
 
 
Parliament Headlines | Politics Headlines | Regional Headlines

 

Plain Packs Plan: Gordon Campbell On Tobacco Politicking (And The TPP Death Watch)

Has Act leader David Seymour got the easiest job in the world, or what? Roll out of bed, turn on the radio and hmm…there do seem to be a lot of problems out there in the world. Must think of something. And so it came to pass that this morning, David Seymour took up his sword and shield to fight for a world that’s about to be denied the rich and vibrant beauty of tobacco advertising. More>>

ALSO:

.


RECENT TPP MEETING:

Professor Ian Shirley: The Budget That Failed Auckland

The 2016 budget offered Auckland nothing in the way of vision or hope and it continued the National Government’s threats against the Auckland Council. Threatening the Council with over-riding its democratic processes if it fails to release land for housing is a bullying tactic aimed at diverting attention away from the fundamental problems with housing in the region. More>>

ALSO:

PM's Post Cab Presser: Budgets, Trusts And Pacific Diplomacy

Today Prime Minister John Key summarised last week’s budget and provided further detail about his upcoming trip to Fiji. He said that there has been “plenty going on” in the last couple of weeks and emphasised the need for Auckland council to facilitate more housing supply. More>>

ALSO:

Max Rashbrooke: A Failure Of Measurement: Inside The Budget Lock-Up

Shortly after the embargo lifted at 2pm news organisations started filing reports claiming that health, and to a lesser extent housing and education, were the ‘big winners’ out of the Budget. It failed to take into account the fact that in most cases the apparent increases were in fact cuts. Because of the twin effects of inflation and population. More>>

ALSO:

DOCtored Figures: Minister Clarifies DOC Budget

“Commentators have overlooked the fact $20.7m of that perceived shortfall is new funding for Battle for our Birds 2016, provided for in last week’s Budget...” DOC also has approval in principle to carry over a further $20m to 16/17 due to unexpected delays in a number of projects. More>>

ALSO:

For The Birds: Gordon Campbell On The Budget

Budgies, so their Wikipedia page says, are popular pets around the world due to their small size, low cost, and ability to mimic human speech. Which is a reasonably good description of Finance Minister Bill English eighth Budget. . More>>

Max Rashbrooke On The 2016 Budget

The best label for this year’s announcement by Bill English might be the ‘Bare Minimum Budget’. It does the bare minimum to defuse potential political damage in a range of areas – homelessness and health are prime among them – but almost nothing to address the country’s most deep-rooted, systemic social problems. Indeed the Budget hints that these problems may get worse. More>>

ALSO:

Gordon Campbell: On Bank Scandals (And Air Crashes)

Last month, the Australian Securities and Investment Commission (ASIC) filed proceedings against Westpac over activities that have some distinct echoes of the Libor scandal. More>>

Get More From Scoop

 

LATEST HEADLINES

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Parliament
Search Scoop  
 
 
Powered by Vodafone
NZ independent news