Gordon Campbell | Parliament TV | Parliament Today | Video | Questions Of the Day | Search

 


Speech To The Australia NZ Leadership Forum

David Cuncliffe

27 November 2013

Speech To The Australlia NZ Leadership Forum

1. Introduction

It is a pleasure to be making my first international visit as the Leader of New Zealand’s Labour Party, and a real honour to address the Australia New Zealand Leadership Forum.

Earlier in my career, I worked on both sides of this important bilateral relationship. While my time at New Zealand’s MFAT is common knowledge, less well known is that I spent a year of that period on secondment to Australia’s DFAT, based in Canberra. I’m especially grateful to the Commonwealth for sponsoring the secondees on a fact-finding mission to places like Uluru and Kakadu.

It is no accident that I have chosen this forum as my first international address after becoming leader of my party.

The relationship with Australia is the most important that New Zealand has. And I know the Trans-Tasman relationship is of immense importance in Australia as well.

We all recall that the ANZAC tradition was forged in Gallipoli, but we share so much more than history. We share one of the deepest trading relationships in the world. We share wider economic interests, regional interests, and common positions on many of the issues facing the global community.

The Trans-Tasman relationship makes both our countries stronger.

The cornerstone of this bilateral relationship is broad dialogue, and the Australia New Zealand Leadership Forum plays a crucial role in keeping that dialogue moving forward.

2. Taking stock: The Trans-Tasman relationship today

Australia and New Zealand share so many bonds, so many different links, that we are like family. Many families talk disproportionately about the few areas where they may clash or differ, and take the many things they have in common for granted.

Our shared understandings and common interests are too important to let small differences get in the way.

Let’s take stock.

We are among each other’s most important trading partners. Australia is New Zealand’s number one market for exports and source for imports. And New Zealand features prominently in Australia’s top ten lists on both counts as well. Over $25 billion in goods and services flowed to and fro across the Tasman last year.

We should be proud that our two countries have harmonized so many of our economic rules. Where there was agreement and mutual advantage, we cut through the inertia to reduce the cost of doing business. The WTO has recognized CER as one of the world’s model free trade agreements.

My party supports continuing to manage down remaining inappropriate barriers, so long as doing so makes Australia better off and makes New Zealand better off as well. It often will.

Part of my vision for the New Zealand economy is that we transition away from being a volume-based producer of commodities towards being a value-based supplier of products and services. That directs more of the final value derived from our products to New Zealanders. This is one way we can make sure our economy works for everyone.

As an example of the volume-to-value challenge, unemployed New Zealanders watch on with bewildered disappointment as raw logs sail from Tauranga to processing plants many thousands of kilometres away, only to be imported back to New Zealand as timber for the post-earthquake rebuild in Canterbury. If elected Prime Minister, I will work alongside business and communities to develop our regions and retain more of the value of New Zealand resources in New Zealand.

That vision is all the more difficult to achieve, however, if many of our major markets – also many of Australia’s major markets – continue to place unfair impediments in the way of trade in some goods, including but not limited to the agriculture sector.

Just as we break down barriers in our own relationship, we must both continue to push the rest of the world to take down its anachronistic restrictions around the agricultural trade.

Our mutual interests go well beyond matters of trade.

We are among the most frequent visitors to each other’s’ shores, for both work and play, with hundreds of thousands of people crossing the ditch every year.

Australia and New Zealand have an important joint presence in the wider South Pacific region, which is enjoying increasing global attention.

New Zealand was the first to heed the call to support the independence of Timor Leste with a bipartisan commitment to a battalion-sized contingent in 1999. We jointly established the Regional Assistance Mission to Solomon Islands (RAMSI), which prevented ongoing bloodshed in that country. We have also worked closely together in Bougainville, and on development assistance around the region.

Together we have important roles to play keeping the international waters in our region safe and sustainable. Together we share a strong interest in the fisheries stock of the South Pacific being sustainably managed and providing a decent return to the Forum Island Countries.

The South Pacific is receiving increasing strategic attention from major world powers. We need to develop ever-deeper regional relationships with our Pacific neighbours as they adjust to this new international context.

Our interests frequently align on the broader international stage. Australia and New Zealand stand shoulder to shoulder advocating for a world with fair, rules-based international trade, and a world with more peace and cooperation.

However, even if Australia and New Zealand had no historic bonds – if there had been no common ancestry for many of us, no humanitarian exchanges following earthquakes or bush fires, no Gallipoli – even if we had none of that history, there would still be an overwhelming case to cooperate and further develop a deep bilateral relationship.

3. Looking to tomorrow: Advancing the bilateral relationship further

My belief is that there remains potential to deepen the Trans-Tasman relationship still further. We have achieved great things already, but there is more to do.

Just as in a family, the best way to make sure the small differences don’t grow into significant barrier is to resolve them.

Further development of the relationship should be based on two guiding principles: sovereign equality and mutual respect.

Australia and New Zealand may have different populations and resources bases, but we share the status of being two proud sovereign nations. While we of course enjoy positive relations with the various Australian States and territories, in international affairs the New Zealand government is one of two in Australasia, not one of seven.

As the numerically smaller partner, respect for that sovereign constitutional relationship is important to us.

As Paul Keating once enjoined us, the strength of our shared history should be a platform and not a substitute for a mature, mutually respectful assessment.

I want to turn now to two sensitive issues where I believe a mature reassessment is warranted.

Franking / Imputation Credits

I concur with other speakers today, that the issue of mutual recognition of imputation credits must be dealt with.

Australians and New Zealanders invest heavily in each other’s economies, but not as seamlessly as they might if the tax rules were fairer and transmitted market signals more neutrally.

Crucially, as many in this Forum will have discussed on multiple occasions, neither New Zealand nor Australia recognize the company tax already paid on dividends across the Tasman when assessing an investor’s personal income tax. Company tax paid domestically, however, is credited.

As made clear by the New Zealand Productivity Commission, in a view which I believe is likely to be shared by economists on both sides of the Tasman – this leads to an unhealthy situation where returns on domestic investment in both countries are taxed only at the prevailing personal tax rates, while returns on Trans-Tasman investments are taxed twice, once on either side of the sea. This is effectively a tariff on capital.

I recognize that addressing this issue will require political courage on both sides. The fiscal costs of reform are actually proportionately larger for New Zealand; but we must take a long-term, whole-of-economy view of this crucial issue.

I wish to state clearly that it remains unfinished business which in our view must be progressed if our mutual relationship is to be taken to the next level.

I challenge my political counterpart to make clear his intentions to resolve this barrier.

A Fair Go for Citizens – Both Ways

Sometimes sovereign equality and mutual respect require us to advocate for those of our citizens who reside in the others’ borders.

The fact is, for all sorts of historical reasons, New Zealanders living in Australia are not treated equivalently to Australians living in New Zealand. Some well-known examples of this are in the realm of social services:

• Australians studying in New Zealand can access New Zealand’s student support payments after two years, while most New Zealanders studying in Australia cannot access equivalent Commonwealth payments at all.

• New Zealanders living in Australia must pay for public disability insurance, but most cannot access any if they become disabled. Australians living in New Zealand pay into our ACC system and can access it if the need arises.

Another fundamental area where the fair go does not go both ways lies in paths to citizenship.

Australian nationals who come to live in New Zealand and wish to become New Zealanders; who work hard, pay taxes, and contribute to the community can eventually be full participants in New Zealand life.

But many New Zealand nationals who come to live in Australia, and who wish to become Australians; who work hard, pay taxes, and contribute to the community have no equivalent path.

Australians who move to New Zealand become permanent residents on arrival, whereas most New Zealanders who move to Australia are not accorded the same status.

No one could argue against a reasonable and credible pathway to permanent residence for New Zealanders in Australia. But our shared commitment to a fair go requires us to have a hard look at the status quo.

There is a widespread but misconceived impression that NZ migrants to Australia are of lower than average skill levels and more likely than average to be unemployed. The reality is very different. New Zealanders moving to Australia, of whom we have regrettably had over 200,000 in the life of our current government alone, tend to have higher than average skill levels and to be from younger than average age cohorts. In many cases they bring with them the benefit of years of investment from the New Zealand education system, including at tertiary level.

Our treatment of each other’s businesses and each other’s citizens must honour our highest traditions and the principles and values which govern this, our most important, bilateral relationship.

I am committed to working with Australian counterparts to give effect to the principles of sovereign equality and mutual respect that we both hold dear in the finest ANZAC tradition.

4. Concluding remarks

Our two countries are more like family than we sometimes care to admit. We share genealogy, history, economic interests, regional interests, and global interests.

In any relationship as deep and as broad as ours, some issues are bound to crop up. In some areas, I think New Zealand can do more to advance Australia’s interests at little or no cost to ourselves, and in other areas I think the opposite is true.

I look forward to the opportunity to help build even greater strength in Trans-Tasman relations in the near future, including through engagement with the important work of this Forum.

Thank you.


ends

© Scoop Media

 
 
 
 
 
Parliament Headlines | Politics Headlines | Regional Headlines

Gordon Campbell: On The Farcical Elevation Of David Seymour

With the election won, it’s time to find jobs for the boy. David Seymour is the Act Party’s latest scrounger to be rewarded by the National Party, and not only with a seat in Parliament. This time around, a couple of parliamentary Undersecretary posts in education and regulatory reform have been thrown in, plus an annual salary of $175,000 while he learns the ropes. Shouldn’t Seymour at least be put on a 90 day trial before he gets his hands on that sort of serious moolah?

It would be for his own good, really. At this rate, Act is never going to learn how to make its own way in the world More>>

 

As Key Mulls Joining ISIS Fighting: McCully Speech To UN Backs Security Council Bid

It is an honour to address you today on behalf of the Prime Minister and Government of New Zealand. Our General Election took place last week - our Prime Minister Rt Hon John Key is engaged in forming a government and that is why he is unable to be here in New York... More>>

ALSO:

Labour: Cunliffe Triggers Party Wide Leadership Contest

David Cunliffe has resigned as Labour Leader, but says he will seek re-election... If there is any contest the election will have to go through a process involving the party membership and union affiliates. More>>

ALSO:

Flyover Appeal: Progress And Certainty, Or Confusion And More Delays?

Lindsay Shelton: The Transport Agency, embarrassed by the rejection of its flyover alongside the Basin Reserve, says it’s appealing because the decision could “constrain progress.” Yet for most clear-sighted Wellingtonians a 300-metre-long concrete structure above Kent and Cambridge Terraces would in no way be seen as progress… More>>

ALSO:

Gordon Campbell: On Cunliffe’s Last Stand

Right now, embattled Labour leader David Cunliffe has three options. None of them are particularly attractive for him personally, or for the Labour Party... More>>

ALSO:

Key Seeking 'New Ideas': Look To Children’s Commissioner On Poverty - Greens

John Key should not reinvent the wheel when it comes to ideas for tackling child poverty, and instead look to the recommendations of the Children’s Commissioner’s Expert Group on Child Poverty, Green Party co-leader Metiria Turei says. More>>

ALSO:

'Safe To Re-Enter' - OIA Docs: Safety Is Absolute Priority At Pike River Mine

“We understand that the time it is taking to complete our evaluation of the risks is frustrating for the family members and we are trying to complete this work as quickly as we can,” Ms Dunphy says. “It is Solid Energy’s responsibility to make this decision and we will do so, once we have all the information required to make a fully-informed decision.” More>>

ALSO:

Images & Report: Mihi To Welcome Newly-Elected MPs To Parliament

The 29 newly elected MPs were welcomed into Parliament with a Mihi. Parliament’s current Speaker David Carter offered advice from his experience working in Parliament advising the MPs to work collaboratively. More>>

Gordon Campbell: On Labour’s Very Bad Year

While Labour leader David Cunliffe still appears to be in denial about the extent of Saturday night’s debacle, there was hardly a single redeeming feature about the election results for the centre-left... More>>

ALSO:

General Election NZ: National Win

Election Night: With almost all votes counted National and John Key have won a third term and are close to being able to govern alone if they so choose. Key has indicated he will still reach out to form a Government with ACT, United Future and Maori Party. More>>

ALSO:

Perfectly-Timed Anniversaries: Suffrage Day Is Last Chance To Enrol

“The last chance to enrol is Friday 19 September. You can’t enrol on election day.” More>>

ALSO:

Get More From Scoop

 

LATEST HEADLINES

 
 
 
 
More RSS  RSS
 
 
 
 
Parliament
Search Scoop  
 
 
Powered by Vodafone
NZ independent news