Gordon Campbell | Parliament TV | Parliament Today | Video | Questions Of the Day | Search

 


Development contributions bill wasted opportunity

Phil

TWYFORD

Housing Spokesperson

22 May 2014 MEDIA STATEMENT

Development contributions bill wasted opportunity

National’s proposed changes to the rules on development contributions would make little difference to housing affordability, and are yet another example of Housing Minister Nick Smith chasing a headline, Labour’s Housing spokesperson Phil Twyford says.

“The proposed changes are better than nothing, but that is a low bar.

“Giving developers the right to appeal development contributions, and stopping Councils from levying developers for community infrastructure like halls, reserves and swimming pools may deliver a small cost saving on the price of a new home, but the costs will either be shifted to ratepayers or we will see lower quality developments built without essential community amenities.

“This is National kicking the can down the road, instead of seriously grappling with the challenge of making new housing more affordable.

“Ratepayers will be unimpressed with National’s move to have them pick up more of the tab for new developments. Auckland Council says it will add 8.5 percent to the average rates bill of Auckland households by 2021/22.

“If the Government was serious about making housing more affordable it would have done a more fundamental rethink of how to fund infrastructure costs for new urban development.

“No thought has been given to how development contributions could be used to incentivise more desirable forms of development.

“Nor has any consideration been given to the idea of spreading the cost of infrastructure over its lifetime by funding it through bonds paid back through a targeted rate. This approach wouldn’t reduce the cost but by spreading it over a 30 year period would lower the up-front cost for first home buyers. These ideas have been advocated by the NZ Initiative, based on the Municipal Urban Development (MUD) entities in Texas.

“It wouldn’t fit Nick Smith’s classic approach of blaming Councils and then passing a Bill that pretends to make a difference, but more practical benefits might be achieved by tackling productivity improvements in the way infrastructure providers deliver the range of services for new developments. Some of the larger new developments have made significant savings through more sophisticated process management in laying down electricity, broadband, roads, lighting, and water infrastructure.”

© Scoop Media

 
 
 
 
 
Parliament Headlines | Politics Headlines | Regional Headlines

 

Plain Packs Plan: Gordon Campbell On Tobacco Politicking (And The TPP Death Watch)

Has Act leader David Seymour got the easiest job in the world, or what? Roll out of bed, turn on the radio and hmm…there do seem to be a lot of problems out there in the world. Must think of something. And so it came to pass that this morning, David Seymour took up his sword and shield to fight for a world that’s about to be denied the rich and vibrant beauty of tobacco advertising. More>>

ALSO:

.


RECENT TPP MEETING:

Professor Ian Shirley: The Budget That Failed Auckland

The 2016 budget offered Auckland nothing in the way of vision or hope and it continued the National Government’s threats against the Auckland Council. Threatening the Council with over-riding its democratic processes if it fails to release land for housing is a bullying tactic aimed at diverting attention away from the fundamental problems with housing in the region. More>>

ALSO:

PM's Post Cab Presser: Budgets, Trusts And Pacific Diplomacy

Today Prime Minister John Key summarised last week’s budget and provided further detail about his upcoming trip to Fiji. He said that there has been “plenty going on” in the last couple of weeks and emphasised the need for Auckland council to facilitate more housing supply. More>>

ALSO:

Max Rashbrooke: A Failure Of Measurement: Inside The Budget Lock-Up

Shortly after the embargo lifted at 2pm news organisations started filing reports claiming that health, and to a lesser extent housing and education, were the ‘big winners’ out of the Budget. It failed to take into account the fact that in most cases the apparent increases were in fact cuts. Because of the twin effects of inflation and population. More>>

ALSO:

DOCtored Figures: Minister Clarifies DOC Budget

“Commentators have overlooked the fact $20.7m of that perceived shortfall is new funding for Battle for our Birds 2016, provided for in last week’s Budget...” DOC also has approval in principle to carry over a further $20m to 16/17 due to unexpected delays in a number of projects. More>>

ALSO:

For The Birds: Gordon Campbell On The Budget

Budgies, so their Wikipedia page says, are popular pets around the world due to their small size, low cost, and ability to mimic human speech. Which is a reasonably good description of Finance Minister Bill English eighth Budget. . More>>

Max Rashbrooke On The 2016 Budget

The best label for this year’s announcement by Bill English might be the ‘Bare Minimum Budget’. It does the bare minimum to defuse potential political damage in a range of areas – homelessness and health are prime among them – but almost nothing to address the country’s most deep-rooted, systemic social problems. Indeed the Budget hints that these problems may get worse. More>>

ALSO:

Gordon Campbell: On Bank Scandals (And Air Crashes)

Last month, the Australian Securities and Investment Commission (ASIC) filed proceedings against Westpac over activities that have some distinct echoes of the Libor scandal. More>>

Get More From Scoop

 

LATEST HEADLINES

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Parliament
Search Scoop  
 
 
Powered by Vodafone
NZ independent news