Gordon Campbell | Parliament TV | Parliament Today | Video | Questions Of the Day | Search

 


Use of intrusive powers within the parliamentary precinct

[Full report: Fullreporttextintrusive.pdf]

Question of privilege regarding use of intrusive powers within the parliamentary precinct

Summary of recommendations

We recommend that the House adopt the Protocol for release of information from parliamentary information and security systems (page 14).

We recommend that the Government update the Cabinet Manual to reflect that where an inquiry is established under the Inquiries Act 2013, the exercise of powers in relation to members of Parliament and the parliamentary agencies will require recognition of parliamentary privilege; and develop some standard terms of reference for use in any inquiry where it appears that powers may be exercised in relation to members and the parliamentary agencies (page 16).

1 Introduction

On 11 July 2013 the Speaker ruled that a question of privilege arose from issues raised in a letter to him from Dr Russel Norman. The issues related to the exercise of intrusive powers against members, and the release of information from parliamentary information and security systems. The question consequently stood referred to this committee. The ruling is appended to this report.

The particular incident involved the release of information held on parliamentary information systems to the author of Inquiry into the unauthorised release of information relating to the GCSB compliance review report: The leak of the Kitteridge report. We were not asked to investigate this matter as a contempt of privilege. Nor were we asked to determine who was responsible for the release. Instead, we were tasked with examining the particular incident involving the release of information from parliamentary information and security systems that led to the question of privilege being referred, and the more general issue of appropriate principles for access to and release of information from parliamentary information and security systems.

In December 2013 we presented to the House our interim report on this question of privilege. Our interim report set out a summary of the facts surrounding the particular incident leading to the referral, which we ascertained following a request for submissions from interested parties and the hearing of oral evidence.

We also set out in our interim report key issues highlighted by the incident, which we signalled we would need to consider further when developing our guidance in this area.

The incident raised important questions about protecting the privileges and immunities of the House, including the freedom of speech of members, and the ability of Parliament to maintain control within its precincts.

We have now considered these issues further, and set out in this report the principles and protocol we recommend should apply to such requests for information from parliamentary information and security systems.

[Full report: Fullreporttextintrusive.pdf]

© Scoop Media

 
 
 
 
 
Parliament Headlines | Politics Headlines | Regional Headlines

 

Gordon Campbell: On The Ombudsman’s Verdict On Paula Rebstock And Ian Rennie

Unfortunately, the brave and damning report by Ombudsman Ron Paterson on the “flawed” and “unfair” inquiry conducted by Dame Paula Rebstock into events at MFAT pulls back the veil on a far wider issue. More>>

ALSO:

Charities' Report: Stressed Families - Overstretched Services

“Like so many of the whānau and families they serve social service organisations are under huge financial stress. The support demanded from desperate people in communities is far outreaching the resources available.” More>>

ALSO:

Detention: Wellingtonians Protest Treatment Of Refugees

Peace Action Wellington (PAW) and around 50 Wellingtonians blockaded the Australian High Commission, creating a symbolic detention centre to protest the Australian Government's policy of mandatory offshore detention for refugees and asylum seekers. More>>

ALSO:

Diver's Alarums: Breach Means Training Provider Must Repay $1.47 Million

The New Zealand School of Outdoor Studies is to repay $1.47 million (GST-exclusive) to the Tertiary Education Commission (TEC) following an investigation which showed that some student enrolments between 2009 -2014 could not be validated and that courses were under-delivered against their agreement with the TEC. More>>

ALSO:

Education: Government Plans Suggest Bulk Funding Return

Plans by the Government to return to bulk funding are likely to see increased class sizes and schools most in need missing out on much-needed resources, Labour’s Acting Education spokesperson Grant Robertson says. More>>

ALSO:

Interim Report: Auckland Looks Long Term To Pay-Per-Km Road Pricing

Aucklanders can expect to be paying variable rates per kilometre to travel on the city's most congested roads under an emerging transport strategy being formulated by the government and the Auckland Council. More>>

ALSO:

Despite Promises: Government Extends Iraq Deployment

Cabinet has agreed to extend New Zealand’s contribution to the joint New Zealand-Australia mission to train Iraqi Security Forces until November 2018. More>>

ALSO:

On The 'Terrorism' Card:

Get More From Scoop

 

LATEST HEADLINES

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Parliament
Search Scoop  
 
 
Powered by Vodafone
NZ independent news