PPTA doesn’t understand who employs teachers
PPTA doesn’t understand who employs teachers
August 8, 2015. 12:40pm
The case of the trainee teacher
caught in the political campaigning of the PPTA is a
national disgrace, says ACT Leader David Seymour.
“The PPTA doesn’t seem to understand that whether a teacher is employed in the state sector, an integrated school, or a partnership school, they are employed by taxpayers. And as taxpayers we elect governments to take decisions on our behalf,” said Mr Seymour.
“The PPTA blog, Pigeonhole, has summarised the rationale for the union’s campaign of discrimination against all staff or trainee teachers associated with Partnership Schools. Its commentary is a welter of misinformation and inaccuracy.
“But there is one very revealing comment: ‘It’s perfectly legal to choose not to employ or work with people on the basis of their current employer – it’s the same as a business not wanting to sell something to a competitor because you don’t want to be copied by them’.
“The PPTA seems to think it operates like a business, in charge of our education system. It’s not. Taxpayers employ teachers with an expectation that they will work in the interests of children, not union ideology.
“The PPTA blog asserts the boycott of this trainee teacher, is ‘by definition discriminatory, but this is both legally and ethically sound’. No, it’s not.
“This disgraceful bullying behaviour wouldn’t be tolerated in the classroom, yet the PPTA advocates it on a national scale.”
ENDS