Free Press - November 10th
Free Press
ACT’s regular bulletin
Good and Bad
Economists
ACT exists in part to advocate
sensible economics from the cross benches. ACT starts from
Henry Hazlitt’s Economics in One Lesson: “The bad
economist sees only what strikes the eye; the good economist
also looks beyond. The bad economist sees only the direct
consequences of a proposed course; the good economist looks
also at the longer and indirect consequences. The bad
economist sees only what the effect of a given policy has
been or will be on one particular group; the good economist
enquires also what the effect of the policy will be on all
groups.”
Muldoon Economics from
Labour
Labour want the government to buy higher
cost goods from firms that employ New Zealanders. Who could
oppose? What if, for example, Kiwirail had bought
locomotives from Dunedin for $1.4 billion instead of sending
$1.3 billion to China?
The Fallacy
The
$1.3 billion Kiwirail actually sent to China in return for
locomotives must come back to New Zealand eventually
(nowhere else accepts NZD). It’ll come back to Kiwi
exporters, but they’ll have to be efficient and they’ll
have to earn it. So Labour would increase our tax bill and
make things tougher for those who export overseas if it
provides a few politically visible jobs in less efficient
industries.
Put it on my Rates
Just as
bad is Phil Twyford’s suggestion councils should borrow to
fund infrastructure then pay it back through an additional
targeted rate. Phil thinks it will drop house prices because
the cost of new homes will be approximately $100,000 lower
in Auckland. He’s right, but it’s not clear why he
thinks that having a cheaper home and higher rates leaves
anybody better off.
But the Council can Borrow
Cheaper?
The left love the old fallacy that the
government/Council can borrow cheaper so if the government
owns/builds/runs something it is cheaper. The problem is
that interest rates reflect the risk of the investment, not
the investor. You may have a great credit rating but
casinos are just as risky for you as anybody else. The risk
premium on suburban infrastructure is no different whether
borrowed by a mortgagee or a council so councils and banks
should charge the same amount for taking on the risk of
funding it.
One Policy Labour Should have
kept
At the 2006 census there were five workers
for every retiree. By the time current university students
retire there will be only two. That’s not a sustainable
dependency ratio. Labour were campaigning to raise the age
of entitlement to NZ Super, now they’re not. As a result
of both major parties failing to ‘get some guts’ on the
issue there will have to be another alternative or we
can’t even announce making Super sustainable until 2020 at
the earliest.
One Policy National can now
Dump
Free Press has previously pointed
out that National’s Bright Line Test on residential
property is the acorn that will grow into a residential
capital gains tax. It exists only to foil Labour’s
agitation for a capital gains tax. Now that Labour have
ruled out the CGT, National should let the Bright Line Test
fall off the Parliamentary agenda and quietly die. Watch
David Seymour speak on the Bright Line Test here.
What Does it All
Mean?
Labour’s economics are just as kooky as
ever, just in new and different ways. Keeping them in
opposition is as important as ever.
Press Gallery
Leaves Crucifixion Half-Finished
We at Free
Press are great admirers of the Parliamentary Press
Gallery but their reporting of Ron Mark’s racist outburst
allowed him to get off lightly. By focusing only on Mark
telling Melissa Lee to go back to Korea, the press opened up
the defence ‘oh well, she asked for it by raising her
experiences as a foreigner.’ Nobody reported his more
objectionable attack on Kanwal Bakshi in the same speech.
Mark singled out Bakshi for being Indian despite Bakshi not
having spoken in the debate. Those who can stomach it
should watch his fake Indian accent from about 5:30 minutes into this video. He is a
disgrace to Parliament.
The New Zealand Values
Statement
Several weeks ago Free Press
argued that New Zealand should require new immigrants to
sign a New Zealand Values Statement modelled on the
Australian Values Statement. We noted that people want to
come to New Zealand precisely because we have an open,
liberal, tolerant society, and it’s not much to expect
people who want citizenship to sign up to these
values.
The Australian Values
Statement
New Australians must sign up to
“Respect for the freedom and dignity of the individual;
freedom of religion; commitment to the rule of law;
Parliamentary democracy; equality of men and women; a spirit
of egalitarianism that embraces mutual respect, tolerance,
fair play and compassion for those in need and pursuit of
the public good; equality of opportunity for individuals,
regardless of their race, religion or ethnic
background.”
Ron Mark would Fail
The
great irony of Mark in particular and New Zealand First in
general is that, in their intolerance and race obsession,
they resemble the very characteristics they perceive in
immigrant groups. Ron Mark couldn’t sign the Australian
Values Statement in good conscience.
The Greens
and the Super Rich
The Greens want to give tax
breaks to those who purchase electric vehicles. The party
that claims to be concerned about inequality is proposing to
tax everybody for the sake of the wealthiest New Zealanders.
A California study of who buys electric vehicles found
“83% of the households have yearly income higher than
$100K, 46% of the households have incomes higher than $150K
(which was the highest category in the
survey)”.
Third Car
The study also
found that 95 per cent of these buyers lived in single
family homes (the kind the Greens hate). As one Silicon
Valley magnate recently put it to Free Press
“everybody in my Menlo Park street has a Tesla Roadster,
but it’s their third car.” Only the Greens could
subsidise the rich to buy high-tech and highly toxic
batteries as a toy. ACT supports sensible economics for
lots of reasons, including that bad economics wastes
resources and damages the
environment.
ENDS