High fixed electricity charges should be tightly constrained by regulation because they serve the interests of the electricity industry and disempower consumers, according to Labour's energy spokesperson Pete Hodgson.

"People who pay high fixed charges effectively pre-pay part of their electricity consumption. The end result is that other energy options such as firewood, gas, energy efficiency or good old-fashioned frugality cannot compete. Moreover high fixed charges directly penalise small consumers relative to larger ones.

"The recent spiralling of higher fixed charges is a phenomenon that is purpose-built to force consumers to use electricity in place of other forms of energy. There are many instances where line companies have held, or even lowered, their fixed charges but where retailers have then raised the fixed component before passing it onto the consumer. However in some other cases the line companies are the culprits.

"Either way this is a practice which is unacceptable. High fixed charges may have validity for non-residential domestic consumers such as bach or crib owners but for the vast majority of domestic connections they are simply wrong."

Mr Hodgson said that he hoped that the legislation currently before Parliament to cap lines company prices would be extended so that the Commerce Commission could also take action against high fixed charges. He said that during his recent visit to Britain the Office of Electricity Regulation (OFFER) were taken aback at the size of some fixed charges in New Zealand.

"That is the difference between the British and New Zealand governments. Britain has no hesitation in seeking out anti-competitive practices and constraining them or outlawing them by regulation. However New Zealand's energy minister Max Bradford, and his Government, are so averse to regulation that they prefer to turn a blind eye to anti-competitive practices rather than address them."

© Scoop Media

Gordon Campbell: On the Sony cyber attack

Given the layers of meta-irony involved, the saga of the Sony cyber attack seemed at the outset more like a snarky European art film than a popcorn entry at the multiplex.

Yet now with (a) President Barack Obama weighing in on the side of artistic freedom and calling for the US to make a ‘proportionate response’quickly followed by (b) North Korea’s entire Internet service going down, and with both these events being followed by (c) Sony deciding to backtrack and release The Interview film that had made it a target for the dastardly North Koreans in the first place, then ay caramba…the whole world will now be watching how this affair pans out. More>>