Gordon Campbell | Parliament TV | Parliament Today | Video | Questions Of the Day | Search

 


Policy: Questions and Answers On ACT's Tax Policy

Does ACT's policy mean low income earners will pay more?

No. ACT is simply reducing the top rate of tax from 33 cents to 20 cents. Low income earners will still pay 15 cents in the dollar, in actual terms, because their tax free threshold will not change. ACT’s policy will ensure equity because low income tax payers, like the retired and beneficiaries will continue to pay the same tax as today.

Does this mean ACT will cut spending?

No. The tax reductions are entirely funded by eliminating the "future initiatives" and reducing the operating surplus. Forecast government spending remains as it is.

So what are “Future Initiatives”?

In every budget there is a fund, which Parliament approves, that puts half a billion dollars a year compounding to one side for Ministers to spend on what ever they feel like. Rather than Government asking taxpayers, they just let tax payers give them the money in advance. It’s like getting an increase on your visa card every year without even asking the bank manager. And of course, the fact the money is there to be spent is all politicians need to spend it.

So how should Government fund important new ideas?

If a new policy is so important or vital then Government should put it to Parliament to be funded each budget – not sneak the money from tax payers in advance. ACT says that there is so much waste in Government that politicians, like every household, should first look to see if they can save by eliminating waste, or change priorities before they fund something new.

Is this scheme affordable?

Yes, because ACT’s figures confirm that controlling Government spending doesn’t mean cutting services. All that needs to be done is to confirm existing government budgets, with any new projects funded, not from the taxpayer, but by cutting waste. ACT's proposal is very conservative because it assumes not one extra job or any extra investment when the tax rate is lowered from 33 cents to 20 cents.

What reduction in government spending will this mean?

In the year 2005 the total reduction would be 3.7 billion, without cuts to the current level of services.

How will ACT's policy create jobs?

Reducing the top rate of tax reduces the cost of capital in New Zealand substantially. This means more investment in New Zealand and more jobs. Many businesses that are unprofitable at 33 cents in the dollar become profitable at 20 cents in the dollar. Ontario in Canada, and Ireland are enjoying substantial growth and job creation as a consequence of the economic stimulus provided by their various tax cuts. Sweden's Social Democratic government is expected to cut taxes between 0.5 and 0.8 percent of GDP in 2000 to reverse the loss of highly skilled technical professionals.

But we have had tax cuts in New Zealand and unemployment is still too high – why will ACT’s plan work?

Simply, tax cuts to date have been great to help family budgets and ACT has supported them. But, they haven't lowered the company rate of tax, which drives the decision to invest in jobs and business in New Zealand. That's why ACT says we have to cut the top rate of tax because that will help the entire economy.

If National are debating whether they can afford a three cent tax cut to the corporate tax rate how can ACT say that you can afford to take the tax rates down to twenty cents?

Simply, because National want to preserve the slush fund to let them spend more. ACT says Government should live within its budgets and not just eat into the taxpayers pocket through the political slush fund that the provision for future initiatives provides. Under our budget the Government will be spending 2.5 billion more a year in 2005 than it is now. What National's saying is that government should be spending $4 billion more.

How can you cut government revenue by this much and not cut government spending?

The tax cuts are taken out of future initiatives (money to be spent on as yet unspecified projects) and the operating surplus, just like the tax cuts that are promised 1 April next year. Clearly, in their cautious way, National has already shown this can be done without any of the hysterical, doomsday scenarios for government services that the Left are ignorantly predicting. ACT says let’s do it on a bigger scale and create 80,000 new jobs, and reward hard working kiwis without penalising low income individuals or families or affecting the level of government services.

ENDS

© Scoop Media

 
 
 
 
 
Parliament Headlines | Politics Headlines | Regional Headlines

 

Mt Roskill: Greens Will Not Stand In Likely Post-Goff By-Election

“The Green Party’s priority is changing the Government in 2017, and as part of that we’ve decided that we won’t stand a candidate in the probable Mt Roskill by-election... This decision shows the Memorandum of Understanding between Labour and the Green Party is working." More>>

ALSO:

Wellington: Predator Free Capital Plan

Wellington City Council (WCC), the Greater Wellington Regional Council (GWRC) and NEXT Foundation, today announced a joint collaboration to make Wellington the first Predator Free capital city in the world. More>>

ALSO:

Gordon Campbell: On Judith Collins’ Efforts At Self Correction

Thousands of prisoners currently in prison may be entitled to an earlier release than expected – and compensation – because Corrections has incorrectly calculated their term of imprisonment. Unless of course, the government buries its mistakes by changing the law and retro-actively getting itself off the hook… More>>

ALSO:

More Justice & Corrections

Sector Opposes Bill: Local Government Bill Timeframe Extended

The Minister of Local Government Peseta Sam Lotu-Iiga has asked the Select Committee to extend the report back date for the Local Government Act 2002 Amendment Bill (No 2). More>>

ALSO:

Breed Laws Don’t Work: Vets On New National Dog Control Plan

It is pleasing therefore to see Louise Upston Associate Minister for Local Government calling for a comprehensive solution... However, relying on breed specific laws to manage dog aggression will not work. More>>

ALSO:

Not Waiting On Select Committee: Green Party Releases Medically-Assisted Dying Policy

“Adults with a terminal illness should have the right to choose a medically assisted death,” Green Party health spokesperson Kevin Hague said. “The Green Party does not support extending assisted dying to people who aren't terminally ill because we can’t be confident that this won't further marginalise the lives of people with disabilities." More>>

ALSO:

General Election Review: Changes To Electoral Act Introduced

More effective systems in polling places and earlier counting of advanced votes are on their way through proposed changes to our electoral laws, Justice Minister Amy Adams says. More>>

Get More From Scoop

 

LATEST HEADLINES

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Parliament
Search Scoop  
 
 
Powered by Vodafone
NZ independent news