Gordon Campbell | Parliament TV | Parliament Today | News Video | Crime | Employers | Housing | Immigration | Legal | Local Govt. | Maori | Welfare | Unions | Youth | Search

 

Alert: Human rights for all or only for some ?

Kia ora,

We have recently received an unsolicited letter from the National MP Anne Tolley, which raises an important issue about human rights, and their application in this country.

The letter, obviously part of a National Party mass mailing, advises people not to support the inclusion of de facto and same sex couples in the Property (Relationships) Bill currently at Select Committee stage - apparently the inclusion of de facto and same sex couples in the legislation, and references in the Bill to 'relationship' and ‘partner’, are ... “unnecessary and will offend many”. The ‘many’ who will be offended are not specified, we’ll leave it to your imagination to provide the missing end to the sentence.

The letter implies that de facto and same sex couples will be treated in the legislation in exactly the same way as married couples - this is not factually correct. The provisions of the Bill will apply to married couples from the date of the marriage; they will apply to de facto and same sex couples after a three year relationship.

The kind of inaccurate prejudice contained in Anne Tolley’s letter has been characteristic of the approach of various National party politicians to the proposed legislation. Jenny Shipley asked in parliament why the people of NZ should have Margaret Wilson’s “... gender-neutral, sort of amoral approach to life thrust upon them.” (1 June 2000, quoted from Hansard).

The issues around the Bill are complex, as indeed is the legislation concerned - the Matrimonial Amendment Bill has been further amended by Supplementary Order Paper No. 25 (May 2000) which, among many other measures, renames the principle Act as the Property (Relationship) Act.

Without going into the complexities of the Bill, there is however a basic principle which is at stake in relation to the inclusion of de facto and same sex relationships in the proposed legislation - the issue of human rights. The Human Rights Act prohibits discrimination on the grounds of marital status, including “living in a relationship in the nature of a marriage” (21.b.vi) and “sexual orientation, which means a heterosexual, homosexual, lesbian, or bisexual orientation” (21.m). We either take the provisions of the Act, and of human rights in general, seriously or we don’t. Human rights either apply to all humans, or they don’t - it is not possible to have partial human rights which only apply to some people, that is contrary to the whole concept of human rights.

If you have not already made a submission on the Property Relationships Bill to the Justice and Electoral Select Committee, then please consider doing so as a matter of some urgency - the closing date is 7 July 2000. You don’t have to do a detailed analysis of the Bill, a simple statement of your support for the application of human rights in this instance (and at all other times!) would be sufficient.

Because of the lateness of this alert, and the rapidly approaching deadline, we have arranged that single page submissions can be sent directly to Tim Barnett’s office, fax (04) 472 4143. If you wish to make a longer more detailed submission, then you will need to supply the standard 20 copies, to be posted to the The Clerk, Justice and Electoral Select Committee, Parliament Buildings, Wellington (no stamp needed).

It would be great if you would consider speaking to the Select Committee, supporters of human rights may be a bit thin on the ground at that stage. If you wish to do this, then you should include a statement on your submission that you wish to make an oral submission. You can at that time present more written material if you have not had time to fully prepare your submission for the 7 July deadline.

If you require further information about the provisions of the Property (Relationships) Bill, we have some briefing papers which we can send by email - either as a Word attachment or as text (please specify which you prefer). Please note - we do not have an email version of the Bill, nor of Supplementary Order paper No 25.

<><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><> Peace Movement Aotearoa the national networking group for peace people PO Box 9314, Wellington, Aotearoa / New Zealand. tel +64 4 382 8129, fax 382 8173, website < http://www.converge.org.nz/pma/> Internet Peace Gateway <><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>


© Scoop Media

 
 
 
Parliament Headlines | Politics Headlines | Regional Headlines

Gordon Campbell: On The New Pike River Agency (And The Air Strike Wing)

Much of the sympathy the public still feels for the families of the Pike River miners has been sustained by the sense that the previous government – let alone the mining company and the processes of receivership and litigation – has never dealt honestly, or fairly, with them.

Finally, yesterday’s announcement by the Ardern government that a new state agency will be set up to assess and plan the manned re-entry to the mine (on a set timetable) goes a long way to meeting the families’ remaining request: that they be enabled, if at all possible, to bury their loved ones. More>>

 

Not Going Swimmingly: Contractor Cut, New Dates For Christchurch Sports Centre

“As an incoming Minister, I have been conducting a thorough review of progress on the Anchor projects and to learn of a $75 million budget blowout on this project was very disappointing..." More>>

ALSO:

Tertiary: Allowances, Loan Living Costs To Get Boost

“From 1 January, student allowance base rates and the maximum amount students can borrow for living costs will rise by a net $50 a week,” says Education Minister Chris Hipkins... further adjusted from 1 April 2018 in line with any increase in the CPI. More>>

ALSO:

Foreign Affairs: Patrick Gower Interviews Jacinda Ardern

Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern says discussions have already begun on how to bring climate change refugees into New Zealand under a Pacific seasonal employment plan... More>>

ALSO:

Gordon Campbell: On The Centre Right’s Love Of ‘Nanny State’

You’d almost think it was 2005 again. That was a time when the rugged individualists of the centre-right were being beset by government regulations on the nature of light-bulbs, the size of shower heads, the junk food available at school tuck shops and other such essentials... More>>

Speaking Of Transport: Public Engagement On Wellington Scenarios

“Our work on possible solutions for Wellington’s transport future is ongoing, but has progressed to the stage where we’re ready to share our ideas with the public and seek their feedback to help guide our next steps...” More>>

ALSO:

Parental Leave: National's Time-Sharing Change Fails

National has proposed a change to the Parental Leave and Employment Protection Amendment Bill that would allow both parents to take paid parental leave at the same time, if that is what suits them best. More>>

ALSO:

 
 
 
 
 

LATEST HEADLINES

  • PARLIAMENT
  • POLITICS
  • REGIONAL
 
 

Featured InfoPages

Opening the Election