Gordon Campbell | Parliament TV | Parliament Today | News Video | Crime | Employers | Housing | Immigration | Legal | Local Govt. | Maori | Welfare | Unions | Youth | Search

 

Policy Implications of the Singapore Agreement

NOTE: The following appeared in the Evening Post 20/9/00 in a slightly edited form.

Policy and constitutional implications of the Singapore agreement
By Bill Rosenberg

There are vital constitutional and policy implications in the controversy over the Singapore free trade agreement (officially called a "Closer Economic Partnership" because the words "free trade" have had a bad press lately).

Yet the public is being given only nine days by the Select Committee hearing submissions, to obtain, read, understand, analyse and make submissions on the complex 192 page document, which was secret until 11 September.

There has been much comment on the agreement's Treaty of Waitangi provision.

Article 74 of the agreement allows "more favourable treatment to Maori", including measures "in fulfilment of [New Zealand's] obligations under the Treaty of Waitangi".

There have been vehement arguments for and against the Article. Labour says it is necessary to allow for social policy to "close the gaps". The opposition say it is divisive.

What is important is that both sides of the argument acknowledge that the agreement will have long term effects that bind future governments. That is why the debate is taking place.

Whatever your views of the agreement itself, this constitutional aspect sounds loud warning sirens. How can today's government bind future governments?

Actually it is worse than that. Currently, Cabinet has the power to ratify international agreements, with only token reference to Parliament. Cabinets can bind future Parliaments.

Surely Cabinet is accountable to Parliament and shouldn't be able to tell the current Parliament what to do, let alone Parliaments yet to be elected? That is a basic constitutional convention.

Admittedly in this case, Helen Clark has magnanimously assured us that Cabinet will abide by Parliament's vote - though uninformed by a proper Select Committee process. But if things don't go her way, and the Singapore agreement does not get approved by Parliamentary vote, she can still go back and get Cabinet to ratify it.

Future, less charitable, governments can, without a word to the public, return to giving Parliament only a token role by exercising Cabinet's extraordinary power.

Ratification would force changes in a number of pieces of legislation. The most important is one which reverses Labour/Alliance policy on freezing tariffs with respect to trade with Singapore.

More importantly, it would prevent future Parliaments from changing many current policies without first getting the agreement of Singapore. For example, we must

* Accept tariff-free imports designed, checked and packed in ingapore with 60% of the value potentially created in appalling, low wage conditions, in an Indonesian free trade zone, perhaps putting people here out of work Accept tariff-free seafood caught anywhere in the world by vessels "registered or recorded" (not necessarily owned) in Singapore

* Retain the higher threshold of $50 million for proposals from Singapore-based investors which require approval by the Overseas Investment Commission, rather than the previous $10 million

Leave the fast money from Singapore's financial dealing rooms, which may destabilise our currency or balance of payments, uncontrolled except after a crisis has hit

* Avoid favouring local over Singaporean suppliers in local and central government contracts worth more than $125,000.

Yet Singapore retains the right to considerably stronger measures, such as controls on foreign investment, various types of incentive payments, and a very powerful collection of government-controlled companies, which own some of the $1.2 billion of Singaporean investment in New Zealand.

This agreement is designed to be a precedent-setter for New Zealand and the rest of APEC - a "Trojan Horse" in the words of Asia 2000's head, Tim Groser. If this one is ratified, the government hopes to apply it to a more ambitious programme of negotiations with the rest of Southeast Asia, South Korea, Chile, Canada and the United States.

That means these issues will only grow in importance. They will remove further options that this and future governments have for managing our economy, our social divides, and our relationship with the rest of the world.

At a time when the wisdom of purist free trade and investment policies is being questioned in the streets, in United Nations human rights reports, by World Bank economists, and in many eveloping countries, the fervour with which these agreements are being pushed seems strange.

It is particularly strange for a government elected to turn around the excesses of the free market and favour local development.

More appropriate would be a thoughtful review of the economic and social effects of such policies, and development of a proper constitutional process.

That process should acknowledge that international agreements are like entrenched legislation. Almost constitution-like, they are difficult to change and bind future Parliaments.

The process must be based on careful scrutiny in open and consultative procedures like those used for often less important legislation.

The Singapore agreement must be subject to such a process too.

AUTHOR NOTE - Bill Rosenberg researches and writes on foreign investment and New Zealand's economic relationship with the world.


© Scoop Media

 
 
 
Parliament Headlines | Politics Headlines | Regional Headlines

Simon Bridges: National Leak Inquiry Points To Jami-Lee Ross

John Billington QC has independently assessed the investigation report. It is his opinion that on the balance of probabilities the evidence establishes that Jami-Lee Ross was the person who leaked the expenses and the sender of the text message.

I accept both the investigation report and the opinion of Mr Billington.

Earlier today I visited Jami-Lee Ross with Paula Bennett and explained to him the report and the opinion of Mr Billington and gave him an opportunity to respond. I was not satisfied with his explanation. More>>

 

New Hager Investigation: War Crimes, Sexual Assaults And Coverups In Armed Forces

A string of current and ex-New Zealand Defence Force staff have contacted Hager since the book he co-authored with Jon Stephenson – Hit & Run – was published in March 2017... More>>

ALSO:

Israel's Anti-Boycott Law: NZ Activists Fined Over Lorde Cancellation Raise $12k For Charity

New Zealand activists being fined in Israel for urging pop singer Lorde to cancel her concert have raised more than $12,000 for a Palestinian charity. More>>

ALSO:

NZEI: Teacher Shortage Plan Falls Short

NZEI Te Riu Roa has welcomed the Government's announcement of new initiatives to address the growing teacher shortage, but says teaching must become a sustainable career choice if there is to be a long-term solution… More>>

ALSO:

New Study: Women’s Refuge Examines Reproductive Coercion In NZ

While some research on reproductive coercion has been undertaken in other countries, like the United States, to date there has not been a comprehensive study of reproductive coercion in New Zealand – making this study a first of its kind. More>>

ALSO:

Gordon Campbell: On The Govt’s Feeble Response To Loan Sharks

The coalition government’s attempts to minimise the harm done by loan sharks comes nearly 12 years after a major report in 2007 had identified how fringe lenders were aggressively targeting low-income Pacific Island and Maori communities. As that study had found, only 43% of those accessing loan sharks were, at the time, in paid employment. More>>

ALSO:

Sewer Drug Tests: Wastewater Testing To Roll Out Nationally

Testing will be rolled out to 38 sites across the 12 Police districts this month and will capture 80% of New Zealand’s population. Police Commissioner Mike Bush says wastewater testing is crucial to Police’s understanding of drug consumption in our communities. More>>

ALSO:

Four Stood Down: Two Probes Into Police Trainees Are Criminal Investigations

Two of the four investigations into trainee police over claims of misconduct are criminal investigations, the Police College training manager says. More>>

ALSO:

Earthquake Claims: One Stop Shop Launched

The Greater Christchurch Claims Resolution Service... will provide independent case management to bring together fast tracked claims handling, specialist engineering support, psychosocial support, and legal expertise to help resolve claims. More>>

ALSO:

 
 
 
 
 

LATEST HEADLINES

  • PARLIAMENT
  • POLITICS
  • REGIONAL
 
 

InfoPages News Channels