Gordon Campbell | Parliament TV | Parliament Today | News Video | Crime | Employers | Housing | Immigration | Legal | Local Govt. | Maori | Welfare | Unions | Youth | Search


Why Do Greens Do Nothing About The Environment?

Why Do The Greens Do Nothing About The Environment?

"A scaremongering armageddon freak show" is how Libertarianz Leader and Tauranga Candidate Russell Watkins described the Greens' "State of the Environment Report" today.

"The Greens refuse to acknowledge that the best environmental conditions are almost always in free countries on private land - landowners care about the water, land and air on their properties. Hundreds of thousands of land-owning New Zealanders look after the plant and animal life on their own properties. Where are they in this 'report'?" asks Watkins.

"The hypocrisy and anti-scientific hysteria regurgitated time and time again by the Green Party is demonstrated in their demand that everyone else be forced to do something about what the Greens don't like, while the Greens themselves never lift a finger to raise their own money for what they value, or take their own steps to protect what they value." Says Watkins. "Their kneejerk solution to everything is authoritarianism."

Watkins says that private property rights are the best way to protect the environment, as people who own what they care about will do everything they can to look after it. "It is no coincidence that privately-owned land and animals are typically better looked after than the government owned alternatives - bureaucrats just don't care as much as property owners do."

Taking a deep breath, Watkins then responded point by point to the Green's report, providing questions - many of them clearly rhetorical - to the points contained in the 'report':

"- Why don't the Greens raise money to buy forests with native timber if they value it so much? - Little South Island high country land has been protected, they say. Why don't the Greens buy the land from the foreigners if it has such value to them? (And who but a racist xenophobe cares where the owners are from anyway?) unless you are racist?) - If the Greens want to protect individual species, why aren't they raising money for breeding programmes? Why don't they buy land to allow them to be protected? Why isn't it legal to farm these species, therefore encouraging individuals to raise their numbers and create new incentives to breed them, or haven't they noticed that chickens, cows and sheep don't need protection for that reason? - If the short-tailed bat and the Blue Duck are internationally important, why aren't the people internationally paying for someone to protect them? To whom precisely are they important? - Why doe the Greens think that taxpayer-funded bureaucrats protect species better than do organisations voluntarily funded with members that have a personal commitment and passion to do so? - Who cares if 0.1% of mainland coastal waters are in marine reserves? How many Greens have dedicated half their own private property to government-mandated land reserves? - Why should people get consent for using a fishing rod? Why can't ocean space be privatised - or are fish more important than people? - Why don't the Greens set up their own fishing company and ensure they don't kill marine mammals and seabirds, advertise the fact, and use the money to pay for other conservation projects? - Why do Greens still eat fish when the fishing industry allegedly is so destructive to species the Greens value? - Noxious plants, animals and insects from overseas may threaten agriculture, but the Greens oppose pesticides and oppose using genetic modification technologies to make species resistant to many of these pests. Why? - If exhaust emissions kill people, why do Green MPs travel in cars and planes, instead of walking, cycling and skateboarding? - If industries and consumers are buying so many of the organic and other Green products that the Greens support, then why must we all be forced to buy them, or forced to not be able to choose alternatives? - Private property is almost always cleaner and environmentally healthier than public areas like rivers. Why not privatise interests in rivers to ensure that someone has a vested interest in protecting them? - If energy demand has increased 90% since 1980, will the Greens celebrate this increase in production, or instead tell factories to close, people to switch off lights and heater, not travel and huddle together in their woolies? - Why is dependency on fossil fuels a problem? When supplies run out, prices will go up and new sources of fuels will become economic. - Why are trains (that consume more fuel than buses per-person-carried) and buses (that take people away from walking and cycling) so environmentally friendly? - If energy efficiency is so important, why do the Greens oppose market pricing for electricity which charges people for what they actually use and encourages people to save? - How many Green MPs are fully 'sustainable' with their own domestic energy consumption, and if they are not, why must the country be? - If waste disposal is a concern, why do the Greens continue to support local government owning and subsidising landfills? - Where is the evidence that genetic engineering causes harm? Why do the Greens support the current prohibition on the right to sue for personal injury by accident that would provide one safeguard against harm to human?"

"Answers on a postcard please," says Watkins.

It's enough to make you vote Libertarianz!


© Scoop Media

Parliament Headlines | Politics Headlines | Regional Headlines

PM's Press Conference: Pike Re-Entry Agency

At today's post-cabinet press conference Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern was joined by Minister Responsible for Pike River Re-entry Andrew Little to announce plans for the new agency for re-entry of the mine.

The Pike River Recovery Agency, Te Kahui Whakamana Rua Tekau ma Iwa, will be officially established on 31 January 2018 and will work with the Pike River families with the intention of manned entry of the drift before March 2019. More>>


Foreign Affairs: Patrick Gower Interviews Jacinda Ardern

Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern says discussions have already begun on how to bring climate change refugees into New Zealand under a Pacific seasonal employment plan... More>>


Gordon Campbell: On The Centre Right’s Love Of ‘Nanny State’

You’d almost think it was 2005 again. That was a time when the rugged individualists of the centre-right were being beset by government regulations on the nature of light-bulbs, the size of shower heads, the junk food available at school tuck shops and other such essentials... More>>

Speaking Of Transport: Public Engagement On Wellington Scenarios

“Our work on possible solutions for Wellington’s transport future is ongoing, but has progressed to the stage where we’re ready to share our ideas with the public and seek their feedback to help guide our next steps...” More>>


Parental Leave: National's Time-Sharing Change Fails

National has proposed a change to the Parental Leave and Employment Protection Amendment Bill that would allow both parents to take paid parental leave at the same time, if that is what suits them best. More>>


Train Free Thursday: Workers Strike To Defend Terms Of Employment

"They signed up to these conditions a year ago when they got the contract for Wellington's rail services. Now they're trying to increase profits by squeezing frontline workers." More>>


Seclusion: Ombudsman Emphasises Importance Of Monitoring

Disability Rights Commissioner Paula Tesoriero says that while there have been changes to the Education (Update) Amendment Act 2017 to prohibit the use of seclusion, the report is an important reminder of the importance of regular monitoring of schools. More>>





Featured InfoPages

Opening the Election