Gordon Campbell | Parliament TV | Parliament Today | News Video | Crime | Employers | Housing | Immigration | Legal | Local Govt. | Maori | Welfare | Unions | Youth | Search


The True Colours of Democracy

The True Colours of Democracy

By Michael Reid

Winston’s on a winner—at least so far as older New Zealanders are concerned. Immigration is an issue which polarises people, especially a few weeks out from an election. Passions are easily invoked.

A sensible approach lies somewhere in the middle between passion and apathy.

Whatever we may think about what Mr Peters says, he should be able to raise the issue without the knee-jerk response of ‘racism’. What that does is short-circuit and shut down debate. Who comes to live in our country, is after all, an important issue.

Migrants may come primarily to meet our needs or theirs: the former is usually in response to an economic need (as with an influx of skilled workers to fill an employment gap), while the latter is more humanitarian, as in taking refugees from countries torn apart by full-scale or civil war.

In both cases though, the people arriving will affect the social fabric and the consequences (for better or worse) will be on-going. So it’s is quite legitimate to question the philosophy guiding immigration policy, quotas, resettlement schemes, and so on. To ignore these issues is irresponsible government.

Like many other words, ‘racism’ is easy to bandy about and clobber people with because it has emotive import. But the important questions remain, and Winston Peters, like any other citizen in a parliamentary democracy should be free to ask them.

The same applies to the Treaty of Waitangi: to raise it and express a desire to debate does not equal ‘racism’. To make derogatory remarks and racial slurs about a people group because of their skin colour, does. But constructive debate avoids that.

Political Correctness (PC) doesn’t help because it sees the state as the authority and purveyor of morality. Not individuals, or communities, but the government and the media; they will tell us how to think and behave in ways deemed acceptable to themselves. Indeed, in many cases, it is the continuing impact of PC that hastily leads to the retort of ‘racism’ when immigration and the Treaty are mentioned.

PC also relies heavily on the attendant notions of tolerance and inclusion. Despite its appearance of being non-moral or ‘neutral’, it tries to promote the morality of no morality. But as most of us know, it has the irritating habit of dictating what is acceptable and what is not, especially in public settings.

Inclusion is a populist and compelling concept and one we have heard a lot about in recent years. But if we think about how it might relate to immigration, we’d have to conclude—logically—that we don’t need an immigration policy because no one would could legitimately be excluded. No parameters, no boundaries; open the doors to all and sundry.

What inclusion really means of course—and it is ironic—is that certain groups and ideas are to be promoted by the state and media to the exclusion of others. And what ideas? Those that are PC.

Tolerance and inclusion are fine until they are questioned; then their advocates tend to be anything but tolerant. If, as Winston Peters claims, the Treaty is meant to be about including all New Zealanders but gives preferential treatment to one particular group, then it’s easy to dismiss him as ‘playing the race card.’ However, his central claim about ‘preferential treatment’ needs to be carefully examined to determine if it has any factual basis.

Older New Zealanders love Winston because he talks their language. He appeals to their memories of more cohesive and homogeneous times.

Political correctness (PC) would have us embrace everyone else, but let’s be honest, communication and understanding are hard enough at the best of times, but doubly hard when language and ethnic barriers are present. And it’s harder for older people to accept the changes that come with an influx of a new people group. Winston’s telling his audiences what they already know, but he does it with plenty of kitsch and a very non-PC boldness.

More importantly, sound immigration policy rests on what we consider to be our goals and values as a nation. Thinking about who should or shouldn’t come to live here raises vital questions about who we are and where we want to go. Only when these questions are confronted can a coherent immigration philosophy be formed.

And that’s difficult in New Zealand in 2002. We live in a pluralist nation, where consensus on certain issues, particularly those of a moral nature, is difficult. What would be good for the nation? What should our immigration policy be?

There are no easy answers and the issues are complex. Economic factors alone can’t be the basis because there are social implications too.

The fact that Winston is so readily slated for expressing his views reflects more on those firing the shots than it does on him exercising his democratic rights to say what he says—even if we don’t agree with him.

(825 words)


© Scoop Media

Parliament Headlines | Politics Headlines | Regional Headlines


Breed Laws Don’t Work: Vets On New National Dog Control Plan

It is pleasing therefore to see Louise Upston Associate Minister for Local Government calling for a comprehensive solution... However, relying on breed specific laws to manage dog aggression will not work. More>>


Corrections Corrected: Supreme Court Rules On Release Dates

Corrections has always followed the lawful rulings of the Court in its calculation of sentence release dates. On four previous occasions, the Court of Appeal had upheld Corrections’ practices in calculating pre-sentence detention. More>>


Not Waiting On Select Committee: Green Party Releases Medically-Assisted Dying Policy

“Adults with a terminal illness should have the right to choose a medically assisted death,” Green Party health spokesperson Kevin Hague said. “The Green Party does not support extending assisted dying to people who aren't terminally ill because we can’t be confident that this won't further marginalise the lives of people with disabilities." More>>


General Election Review: Changes To Electoral Act Introduced

More effective systems in polling places and earlier counting of advanced votes are on their way through proposed changes to our electoral laws, Justice Minister Amy Adams says. More>>

Gordon Campbell: On Our Posturing At The UN

In New York, Key basically took an old May 2 Washington Post article written by Barack Obama, recycled it back to the Americans, and still scored headlines here at home… We’ve had a double serving of this kind of comfort food. More>>


Treaty Settlements: Bills Delayed As NZ First Pulls Support

Ngāruahine, Te Atiawa and Taranaki are reeling today as they learnt that the third and final readings of each Iwi’s Historical Treaty Settlement Bills scheduled for this Friday, have been put in jeopardy by the actions of NZ First. More>>


Gordon Campbell: On The Damage De-Regulation Is Doing To Fisheries And Education, Plus Kate Tempest

Our faith in the benign workings of the market – and of the light-handed regulation that goes with it – has had a body count. Back in 1992, the free market friendly Health Safety and Employment Act gutted the labour inspectorate and turned forestry, mining and other workplace sites into death traps, long before the Pike River disaster. More>>

Get More From Scoop



Search Scoop  
Powered by Vodafone
NZ independent news