Gordon Campbell | Parliament TV | Parliament Today | News Video | Crime | Employers | Housing | Immigration | Legal | Local Govt. | Maori | Welfare | Unions | Youth | Search

 


New Zealand's Persecuted Minority: Property Owners


POLICY ENVIRONMENT

New Zealand's Persecuted Minority: Property Owners


"For some years, regulations to protect 'The Environment' have buried the people who are actually able to protect their environment - property owners," says Libertarianz spokesman Peter Cresswell. His party argues that property owners are ignored at every election, that their property rights are buried with each new piece of legislation spewing out of parliament - and that the ongoing destruction of property rights in this country must cease."

"If property rights were protected rather than abused, then people might soon realise that strong property rights actually provide unmatched environmental protection, and at the same time form the cornerstone of a free society. We must UN-bury our common law heritage," says Cresswell, "and this provides an essential second plank of the Libertarianz policy of environmental deregulation."

COMMON LAW - PROTECTING PROPERTY OWNERS AND 'THE ENVIRONMENT'

"New Zealand has had nearly a decade under the RMA, under planning legislation that abolishes property rights and provides no environmental protection," says Libertarianz Environment Deregulation Spokesman Peter Cresswell. "In doing so we have ignored eight centuries of common law that protects both."

"It is time to acknowledge the failure," he says, "and time to resurrect common law from where it has been buried."

Property owners are ignored at every election. The Resource Management Act has buried property rights - only Libertarianz advocate a stake be driven through the heart of this Act so that our pre-existing common law can be resurrected. Other parties now concede the Resource Management Act 'has proved unwieldy and costly to implement' but their attentions are at best a smokescreen:

- The ACT party's proposed 'reform' of the RMA, for example, will exponentially expand the number of consultants feeding at the RMA trough, while failing to protect property owners in any way at all. - National also promises 'reform' of the RMA, and then tells us that the person chairing that reform will be the same person who wrote the Hauraki Gulf Marine Park Act - the egregious and dishonest Nick Smith. - And of course, Marian Hobbs and Jeanette Fitzsimons would both like the RMA to be even more onerous, and they have already co-written legislation that will make it so - all they need now to put it in place is your vote! - Don't give your vote to them - TO ANY OF THEM!

Property owners from Bluff to Kaiataia have already had their lives destroyed by the Resource Management Act - you will not find a solution in any 'reforms' proposed by any parliamentary party that will fix that. No parliamentary party offers anything that will help those across the country who have had their property stolen from them under this hideous law - from people who own beach-front property on which they cannot build, to those like Adrian Chisholm who have been buried under the Act. There is only one solution - ABOLISH THE RMA! Immediately!

Libertarianz says that we should go back beyond the execrable Town and Country Planning Act, and replace our appallingly invasive environmental law with the sophistication of common law - which has nearly eight hundred years of protection of property rights AND the environment to commend it.

COMMON LAW

It is from the principle of property rights that the body of Common law derives - that property owners should be free to peacefully enjoy their property providing they recognise the same right in others. That is the simple heart of the common law, and from this simple srinciple derive its benefits.

Private property rights enshrined in law provide the best protection for both property owners and the environment. Private property sets up mirrors, in which the consequences of our behaviour is reflected back; it sets up tradable rights and easements which neighbours and others may exchange to their mutual benefits.

That Common Law experienced nearly eight centuries of success in protecting property owners and the environment - before being buried by busybody planning legislation beginning early this century - is ignored by academics, environmentalists and politicians alike, in some cases deliberately. But they ignore a long history of success.

Common Law offers the only way to truly de-politicise the environment, to protect desirable environmental values without the need for constant political agitation - to remove political meddling from property rights issues forever. Property that has had significant features voluntarily covenanted, for example, has the full protection of law for whatever environmental benefits are covenanted.

Reintroducing Common Law now would enable us to untangle the regulatory web that has been engulfing property owners in this country since the introduction of The Town Planning Act of 1926 began burying eight centuries of Common Law sense and certainty.

It offers the only way out. For property owners. And for the environment.

ENDS

For those interested in further information on these important subjects:

- The Libertarianz Submission to Parliament on the Resource Management Act review of 1997 is at www.freeradical.co.nz/content/32/32cresswell.html and on the 2001 Local Government Act review at www.libertarianz.org.nz/lg_act.htm

- Elizabeth Brubaker's book Property Rights in the Defence of Nature shows how the blessed simplicity of common law "has protected the environment from an infinite variety of insults for over seven hundred years." Her excellent book and her Environment Probe organisation in Canada are online at www.environmentprobe.org

- Another excellent on-line reference is The Common Law: How it Protects the Environment by Roger E. Meiners and Bruce Yandle, downloadable at the Political Economy Research (PERC) site www.perc.org/ps.13.htm

- Zoning is still with us under the RMA. Bernard Seigan's book Land Use Without Zoning is still the classic debunking of zoning, describing how Houston functions successfully without it. An update is online at www.libertyhaven.com/personalfreedomissues/freespeechorcivilliberties/hous to nzoning.html and a related on-line essay can be found at www.capitalismmagazine.com/2000/august/zoning1.htm

For any further information, please contact: Peter Cresswell LIBERTARIANZ SPOKESMAN TO DEREGULATE THE ENVIRONMENT (09) 631 0034, organon@ihug.co.nz

www.libertarianz.org.nz www.libz.org


© Scoop Media

 
 
 
 
 
Parliament Headlines | Politics Headlines | Regional Headlines

Gordon Campbell:
On The Last Rites For The TPP

The Trans Pacific Partnership trade deal is one of those litmus issues that has always had more to do with one’s place on the political spectrum than with any imminent reality.

To date, the Greens have opposed (a) a wide range of the leaked content of the TPP (b) the secretive way it has been negotiated and (c) the undemocratic way in which any final document would be ratified. Labour has shared some of those concerns, but while remaining generally supportive of the deal itself.

National has, for its part, been very enthusiastic about the TPP, while still giving assurances about Pharmac being protected... For the TPP’s friends and foes alike though, the end now seems nigh. More>>

 
 

Gordon Campbell: On The Farcical Elevation Of David Seymour

With the election won, it’s time to find jobs for the boy. David Seymour is the Act Party’s latest scrounger to be rewarded by the National Party, and not only with a seat in Parliament. More>>

ALSO:

As Key Mulls Joining ISIS Fighting: McCully Speech To UN Backs Security Council Bid

It is an honour to address you today on behalf of the Prime Minister and Government of New Zealand. Our General Election took place last week - our Prime Minister Rt Hon John Key is engaged in forming a government and that is why he is unable to be here in New York... More>>

ALSO:

Labour: Cunliffe Triggers Party Wide Leadership Contest

David Cunliffe has resigned as Labour Leader, but says he will seek re-election... If there is any contest the election will have to go through a process involving the party membership and union affiliates. More>>

ALSO:

Flyover Appeal: Progress And Certainty, Or Confusion And More Delays?

Lindsay Shelton: The Transport Agency, embarrassed by the rejection of its flyover alongside the Basin Reserve, says it’s appealing because the decision could “constrain progress.” Yet for most clear-sighted Wellingtonians a 300-metre-long concrete structure above Kent and Cambridge Terraces would in no way be seen as progress… More>>

ALSO:

Gordon Campbell: On Cunliffe’s Last Stand

Right now, embattled Labour leader David Cunliffe has three options. None of them are particularly attractive for him personally, or for the Labour Party... More>>

ALSO:

Key Seeking 'New Ideas': Look To Children’s Commissioner On Poverty - Greens

John Key should not reinvent the wheel when it comes to ideas for tackling child poverty, and instead look to the recommendations of the Children’s Commissioner’s Expert Group on Child Poverty, Green Party co-leader Metiria Turei says. More>>

ALSO:

'Safe To Re-Enter' - OIA Docs: Safety Is Absolute Priority At Pike River Mine

“We understand that the time it is taking to complete our evaluation of the risks is frustrating for the family members and we are trying to complete this work as quickly as we can,” Ms Dunphy says. “It is Solid Energy’s responsibility to make this decision and we will do so, once we have all the information required to make a fully-informed decision.” More>>

ALSO:

Get More From Scoop

 

LATEST HEADLINES

 
 
 
 
More RSS  RSS
 
 
 
 
Politics
Search Scoop  
 
 
Powered by Vodafone
NZ independent news