Gordon Campbell | Parliament TV | Parliament Today | News Video | Crime | Employers | Housing | Immigration | Legal | Local Govt. | Maori | Welfare | Unions | Youth | Search

 


Monarchist League Against Supreme Court Law


The Attorney-General, Hon Margaret Wilson, MP, has announced that she will be introducing into Parliament her long-awaited Bill to abolish appeals to the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council. We might well wonder why the Attorney-General has chosen the weeks before the Christmas recess to introduce the Supreme Court of New Zealand Bill into Parliament. Does she hope it will pass quietly and without notice to select committee? If so, she is bound to be disappointed.

Let us not underestimate the importance of this issue. This is no mere technical change, but in its longer-term effects a radical regig of our judicial system. And because of its constitutional importance many commentators have argued that it is a matter which ought to be put to the people in a referendum. In a system which has relatively few checks and balances, the removal of the right of appeal to the Queen in Council should not be made without due consideration and only after genuine agreement has been reached.

Abolition is motivated by nationalism, not a desire to improve the court system, or to improve access. Why does the Attorney-General object to the Law Lords - including New Zealanders - hearing cases from this country, when an increasing range of judicial and administrative decisions are being taken by overseas bodies with the blessing of the Minister? In practice the numbers of appeals to the proposed new Supreme Court are unlikely to be of sufficient number to justify the considerable investment in money and judicial personnel required.

Most lawyers are opposed to the abolition of appeals to the Privy Council, and doubtless will continue to do so until a more satisfactory justification is given for the abandonment of a tribunal which costs the New Zealand taxpayer nothing, and which gives us access to some of the finest legal minds in the common law world. Many Maori also see this proposal as a retrograde step, both by removing an impartial tribunal to which they have hitherto been able to appeal, and by cutting another link with the Crown.

Dr Noel Cox

Chairman

The Monarchist League of New Zealand Inc.


© Scoop Media

 
 
 
 
 
Parliament Headlines | Politics Headlines | Regional Headlines

 

PARLIAMENT TODAY:

Arming Police: Frontline Police To Routinely Carry Tasers

"In making the decision, the Police executive has considered almost five years worth of 'use of force' data… It consistently shows that the Taser is one of the least injury-causing tactical options available when compared with other options, with a subject injury rate of just over one per cent for all deployments." More>>

ALSO:

Gordon Campbell: On D-Day For Dairy At The TPP

While New Zealand may feel flattered at being called “the Saudi Arabia of milk” it would be more accurate to regard us as the suicide bombers of free trade. More>>

ALSO:

Leaked Letter: Severe Restrictions on State Owned Enterprises

Even an SOE that exists to fulfil a public function neglected by the market or which is a natural monopoly would nevertheless be forced to act "on the basis of commercial considerations" and would be prohibited from discriminating in favour of local businesses in purchases and sales. Foreign companies would be given standing to sue SOEs in domestic courts for perceived departures from the strictures of the TPP... More>>

ALSO:

"Gutted" Safety Bill: Time To Listen To Workplace Victims’ Families

Labour has listened to the families of whose loved ones have been killed at work and calls on other political parties to back its proposals to make workplaces safer and prevent unnecessary deaths on the job. More>>

ALSO:

Regulators: Govt To ‘Crowd-Source’ Regulatory Advice

A wide-ranging set of reforms is to be implemented to shake up the way New Zealand government agencies develop, write and implement regulations. More>>

ALSO:

Board Appointments: Some Minister Appoint Less The 3 In 10 Women

“It’s 2015 not 1915: Ministers who appoint less than 3 in 10 women to their boards must do better, they have no excuse but to do better,” said Dr Blue. More>>

Gordon Campbell: On The 1990s Retro Proposals For Our Health System

As we learned yesterday, the reviews propose that the democratically elected representation on DHBs should be reduced, such that community wishes will be able to be over-ridden by political appointees. In today’s revelations, the reviews also propose a return to the destructive competitive health model of the 1990s. More>>

ALSO:

Get More From Scoop

 

LATEST HEADLINES

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Politics
Search Scoop  
 
 
Powered by Vodafone
NZ independent news