Gordon Campbell | Parliament TV | Parliament Today | News Video | Crime | Employers | Housing | Immigration | Legal | Local Govt. | Maori | Welfare | Unions | Youth | Search


Referendum on Supreme Court called for

Referendum on Supreme Court called for. Need for Court questioned.

Government's Supreme Court Bill introduced late last year raises serious constitutional and business concerns, the Employers & Manufacturers Association (Northern) says.

The EMA says a referendum is needed on the issue, once a comprehensive public debate and discussion has been carried out.

"A big change to our constitutional framework such as this should not be made by a bare majority vote in Parliament," said Peter Tritt, EMA's Manager of Employment Relations.

"The Judiciary is the third arm of Government, along with Parliament and the executive, and we wouldn't change the structure of either of those without a referendum.

"We changed to MMP only after a referendum and we shouldn't be breaking links to the Privy Council and establishing a New Zealand Supreme Court without the fullest consultation with the public at large and after their vote on it.

"As well as the constitutional issues, other matters in the Supreme Court Bill are of serious business concern," Mr Tritt said.

"If Government is determined to abandon legal redress through the Privy Council our view is we should not establish a Supreme Court but make our Court of Appeal the final place to decide legal issues.

"Both Canada and Australia did this. New Zealand should follow suit.

"Canada discontinued access to the UK's Privy Council in the 1930's, federal Australia in 1967 with the Australian states severing their links in the 1980's, and Singapore in 1994.

"None of them created another court locally as the Government proposes in the Supreme Court Bill.

"However Canada and Australia have federal systems of political and legal administration unlike ours. Only Singapore has a unitary legal system similar to New Zealand's and it provides a three tiered legal system. This appears entirely adequate.

"If our judiciary can't get it right once a case has been heard three times, a fourth hearing locally wouldn't improve the odds.

"If our judiciary didn't get it right once a case has been through a subordinate Court, the High Court and the Court of Appeal there's no reason to expect the local judges of the new Supreme Court would do any better.

"New Zealand's proposed Supreme Court is also to be given authority over employment issues which are not currently allowed in respect of the Privy Council.

"For employment cases this effectively means there would be five layers of mediation and judiciary. It's bureaucracy gone mad.

"Litigation costs for employers would balloon on top of the extra $3-5million that the new Court has been estimated to cost to administer.

"We have to question Government's wisdom in seeking to establish this extra layer of cost on our economy which our trade competitors don't have to support."

© Scoop Media

Parliament Headlines | Politics Headlines | Regional Headlines

Supreme Court: Worksafe Decision On Whittall Pike River Prosecution Unlawful

The question in issue on the appeal was whether WorkSafe New Zealand acted to give effect to an unlawful agreement of this nature when it offered no evidence on charges against Peter William Whittall for breaches of the Health and Safety in Employment Act 1992...

The Supreme Court... has found that the decision to offer no evidence was made under an unlawful agreement to stifle prosecution. It has granted a declaration to that effect. More>>


Cullen To Chair: Tax Working Group Terms Of Reference Announced

Finance Minister Grant Robertson and Revenue Minister Stuart Nash today announced the Terms of Reference for the Tax Working Group and that the Group will be chaired by Sir Michael Cullen. More>>


Gordon Campbell: On The New Pike River Agency (And The Air Strike Wing)

Much of the sympathy the public still feels for the families of the Pike River miners has been sustained by the sense that the previous government – let alone the mining company and the processes of receivership and litigation – has never dealt honestly, or fairly, with them. More>>


Not Going Swimmingly: Contractor Cut, New Dates For Christchurch Sports Centre

“As an incoming Minister, I have been conducting a thorough review of progress on the Anchor projects and to learn of a $75 million budget blowout on this project was very disappointing..." More>>


Tertiary: Allowances, Loan Living Costs To Get Boost

“From 1 January, student allowance base rates and the maximum amount students can borrow for living costs will rise by a net $50 a week,” says Education Minister Chris Hipkins... further adjusted from 1 April 2018 in line with any increase in the CPI. More>>


Foreign Affairs: Patrick Gower Interviews Jacinda Ardern

Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern says discussions have already begun on how to bring climate change refugees into New Zealand under a Pacific seasonal employment plan... More>>


Gordon Campbell: On The Centre Right’s Love Of ‘Nanny State’

You’d almost think it was 2005 again. That was a time when the rugged individualists of the centre-right were being beset by government regulations on the nature of light-bulbs, the size of shower heads, the junk food available at school tuck shops and other such essentials... More>>




Featured InfoPages

Opening the Election