Gordon Campbell | Parliament TV | Parliament Today | News Video | Crime | Employers | Housing | Immigration | Legal | Local Govt. | Maori | Welfare | Unions | Youth | Search

 


Ensuring The Future Of Rail In NZ - Report

January 2003
Ensuring The Future Of Rail In New Zealand

You will be aware of recent media publicity about problems with New Zealand’s rail system, including welded rails buckling in the heat, derailments, stranded passengers in Wellington, major concerns about overall track maintenance, and current discussions between Government and Tranz Rail on a range of options including subsidies and a Government buy back of the rail network.

Major freight users concerned

Major rail freight users are very concerned at the developing situation if no action is taken. The future of the country’s rail services, a vital part of the Land Transport Strategy, is at risk.

The national benefits of a viable rail freight service are well accepted and include more competitive pricing by exporters, a beneficial impact on road congestion and better environmental outcomes and energy use.

Yet in the 10 years since rail was privatised, rail freight’s share of total freight has shrunk to about 10% and monopoly operator Tranz Rail continues to lose market share to other transport modes. This is at a time when NZ’s economic growth rates have been amongst the highest in the OECD, with the last quarter’s GDP growth being particularly strong. Rail freight revenues should at least keep pace with this growth rate.

Significant spending needed on tracks

While roads are continually improved and travel times reduced, little is done to improve the ability of the rail network to compete through enhancements to the system. As the recent Halliburton Report reveals, the monopoly network operator continues to have serious problems adequately maintaining the existing network. Significant portions of the network have weight and speed restrictions, and tunnels which restrict load size. This is not a sound basis for running a competitive freight service.

Should the Government buy back the network it needs to factor into the purchase price the substantial liability for deferred maintenance (possibly in excess of $200 million). The new owner of the network needs to acknowledge this liability and take responsibility for ensuring that the track is not only “fit for purpose” but that there is a plan to improve it to meet the country’s future needs.

Freight is key to maintaining network

More than 70% of Tranz Rail’s revenues come from freight. Freight revenues are therefore the major source of funding for the maintenance of the network, regardless of who owns it.

As freight volumes shift from rail to road and coastal shipping, the ability to fund the maintenance and operation of the rail network reduces. Once freight users have made investments/entered contracts to use other transport modes, reviving rail through restructuring and a new, competitive approach to freight contracts will be even more difficult. Conversely a strong network operation that actively seeks to attract freight to rail has the potential to spread fixed costs over growing freight volumes and provide a win/win situation for all stakeholders.

New structure needed

The Rail Freight Action Group encourages Government in its negotiations to buy back the rail network at a realistic value, but cautions that buying back the tracks will not, of itself, solve the problems of freight users unless a new management and operating system is adopted. We advocate a Government body to manage and maintain the network of behalf of all New Zealanders, managing safety and timetabling issues for passenger and freight services alike. There needs to be contestable access for competitive freight service providers, paying affordable fees for access to the network. Tranz Rail could still be in a strong position as the incumbent freight service provider, and owner of much of the country’s rolling stock, with current contracts with freight users.

Subsidies the alternative way of the future?

If urgent moves are not made to develop a financially sustainable model for the rail network, and major freight users encouraged to maintain or increase their cargo volumes on rail, subsidies are likely to be increasingly sought to preserve the rail network. Tranz Rail and Government are reported to be discussing subsidies as one option to make rail more competitive with roads.

Transfund is already receiving applications for subsidies under the Alternatives to Roading system to preserve certain provincial lines which Tranz Rail otherwise wants to close. It has no plans to build a link to the new export port at Marsden Point. If there is no change to the present ownership, increasing subsidies from the taxpayer are likely to be needed to maintain the existing privately owned rail network. This will benefit the shareholders of Tranz Rail, not the users, yet it’s freight which underpins the success and future of rail in this country. The Rail Freight Action Group opposes subsidies as distortionary, and believes rail can prosper if it is restructured along the lines suggested.

End to monopoly sought

We are not asking Government to nationalise rail, or to revert to being a provider of rail freight services. We are urging Government to take the opportunity to restructure a monopoly model that clearly is not succeeding, and to enable competitive freight services on the rails, the same as we already have on roads and at sea.

If New Zealand wants to preserve a viable national rail freight and passenger service, these steps are urgent. If rail fails under the current model, it will be very difficult to revive it. The time for a bold restructuring of rail services is now.

Please contact us if you would like more in depth information.

CO-ORDINATOR AND SPOKESPERSON - CEDRIC ALLAN - PORTER NOVELLI NEW ZEALAND LTD

Email: cedric@porternovelli.co.nz

© Scoop Media

 
 
 
 
 
Parliament Headlines | Politics Headlines | Regional Headlines

 

Also, Loan Interest: Productivity Commission On Tertiary Education

Key recommendations include better quality control; making it easier for students to transfer between courses; abolishing University Entrance; enabling tertiary institutions to own and control their assets; making it easier for new providers to enter the system; and facilitating more and faster innovation by tertiary education providers... More>>

ALSO:

Higher Payments: Wellington Regional Council Becomes A Living Wage Employer

Councillor Sue Kedgley said she was delighted that the Wellington Regional Council unanimously adopted her motion to become a Living Wage employer, making it the first regional council in New Zealand to do so. More>>

ALSO:

Scoop Images:
Dame Patsy Reddy Sworn In As Governor-General

This morning Dame Patsy Reddy was sworn in as the New Zealand Realm’s 21st Governor-General. The ceremony began with a pōwhiri to welcome Dame Patsy and her husband Sir David Gascoigne to Parliament. More>>

ALSO:

Ruataniwha: DOC, Hawke's Bay Council Developer Take Supreme Court Appeal

The Department of Conservation and Hawke's Bay Regional Investment Company (HBRIC) are appealing to the Supreme Court over a conservation land swap which the Court of Appeal halted. More>>

ALSO:

With NZ's Marama Davidson: Women’s Flotilla Leaves Sicily – Heading For Gaza

Women representing 13 countries spanning five continents began their journey yesterday on Zaytouna-Oliva to the shores of Gaza, which has been under blockade since 2007. On board are a Nobel Peace Laureate, three parliamentarians, a decorated US diplomat, journalists, an Olympic athlete, and a physician. A list of the women with their background can be found here. More>>

Gordon Campbell: On The Key Style Of Crisis Management

At Monday’s post Cabinet press conference Key was in his finest wide- eyed “Problem? What problem?” mode. No, there wasn’t really a problem that top MPI officials had been at odds with each other over the meaning of the fisheries policy and how that policy should be pursued... More>>

ALSO:

Mt Roskill: Greens Will Not Stand In Likely Post-Goff By-Election

“The Green Party’s priority is changing the Government in 2017, and as part of that we’ve decided that we won’t stand a candidate in the probable Mt Roskill by-election... This decision shows the Memorandum of Understanding between Labour and the Green Party is working." More>>

ALSO:

Get More From Scoop

 

LATEST HEADLINES

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Politics
Search Scoop  
 
 
Powered by Vodafone
NZ independent news