Gordon Campbell | Parliament TV | Parliament Today | News Video | Crime | Employers | Housing | Immigration | Legal | Local Govt. | Maori | Welfare | Unions | Youth | Search

 

Bathing at the beach unlawful - law change needed


Bathing at the beach unlawful - law change needed

Government's decisive resolve for legislative action reasserting the Crown's ownership of New Zealand's seabed and foreshore is an important first step, recreational lobby group Public Access New Zealand believes. This issue was a litmus test for Government, but more remains to be done.

The beach and coastal environment is part of the national consciousness, being the most valued and visited outdoor recreation setting in New Zealand, PANZ spokesman Bruce Mason said.

What hasn't been revealed so far is that the public have no lawful rights of recreation over beaches and foreshores despite being owned by the Crown. This is because in law this is private Crown estate, despite a popular presumption that it is held for the benefit of all New Zealanders.

Other than rights of navigation, there are no rights for anyone to walk, bathe, picnic surf-cast or do anything else at the beach. They are there by mere sufferance of the Crown as owner and could be evicted at any time. The leading case is Blundell v Catterall 1821 (UK) where it was held that the public at common law have no right of bathing in the sea or of crossing the foreshore for that purpose. Blundell's case has been applied in New Zealand. There are no statutory rights of recreation, only controls.

So what most people take as their birthright is illusionary. Decisive legislative action is needed to assure the public that this and future governments will not be able to deny that right.

Government should create statutory rights of foot and bathing recreation over beaches and foreshores. PANZ believes that restrictions or prohibitions to recreation should be confined to special nature reserves, port and defence areas.

References Blundell v. Catterall [1814-23] All E.R. Rep. 39 Crawford v Lecren (1868) 1 N.Z.C.A. 117. King, A P. 1968. The Foreshore; Have the public any rights over it? NZ Law Journal (1968) 254.

© Scoop Media

 
 
 
Parliament Headlines | Politics Headlines | Regional Headlines

Scoop 3.0: How You Can Help Scoop’s Evolution

Entering into its third decade of operation, the Scoop news ecosystem is set to undergo another phase of transformation and evolution.

We have big plans for 2018 as we look to expand our public interest journalism coverage, upgrade our publishing infrastructure and offer even more valuable business tools to commercial users of Scoop. More>>

 
 

Speaking Of Transport: Public Engagement On Wellington Scenarios

“Our work on possible solutions for Wellington’s transport future is ongoing, but has progressed to the stage where we’re ready to share our ideas with the public and seek their feedback to help guide our next steps...” More>>

ALSO:

Parental Leave: National's Time-Sharing Change Fails

National has proposed a change to the Parental Leave and Employment Protection Amendment Bill that would allow both parents to take paid parental leave at the same time, if that is what suits them best. More>>

ALSO:

Train Free Thursday: Workers Strike To Defend Terms Of Employment

"They signed up to these conditions a year ago when they got the contract for Wellington's rail services. Now they're trying to increase profits by squeezing frontline workers." More>>

ALSO:

Seclusion: Ombudsman Emphasises Importance Of Monitoring

Disability Rights Commissioner Paula Tesoriero says that while there have been changes to the Education (Update) Amendment Act 2017 to prohibit the use of seclusion, the report is an important reminder of the importance of regular monitoring of schools. More>>

ALSO:

United Future History: "All Good Things Must End"

'We’re extremely proud of what we’ve achieved over the past 15 years, working alongside the government of the day, both National and Labour.' Mr Light told members on Monday. More>>

Gordon Campbell: On The TPP Outcome, And The Hobbit Law

Somehow the Trans Pacific Partnership trade deal has come lurching back from the dead – and as predicted in this column last week, the member countries gathered in Vietnam have announced a deal in broad principle, shunted aside until a later date the stuff on which they don’t agree, and declared victory. More>>

Agreeing To Differ: Greens Maintain Opposition To TPPA
“The Green Party has long opposed the TPPA. The new proposed deal, which came out of the weekend’s talks, still contains key ISDS concessions to corporations that put our democracy at risk, so our position remains the same,” said Green Party trade spokesperson Golriz Ghahraman. More>>

ALSO:

Monitoring Report: A New Chapter For Children’s Rights In New Zealand?

The Children’s Commissioner is calling on the country to embrace children’s rights to ensure their overall well-being. More>>

ALSO:

 
 
 
 
 

LATEST HEADLINES

  • PARLIAMENT
  • POLITICS
  • REGIONAL
 
 

Featured InfoPages

Opening the Election