Gordon Campbell | Parliament TV | Parliament Today | News Video | Crime | Employers | Housing | Immigration | Legal | Local Govt. | Maori | Welfare | Unions | Youth | Search


Right To Life: Euthanasia

Dear Sir,


The results of a recent TV3 NFO poll on euthanasia are challenged. Advocates of the defeated Death with Dignity Bill claim that a TV3 NFO poll of 1000 voters found 69 per cent thought the law should be changed to give people the right to die.

The poll is misleading and manipulating public opinion on a very important issue. The question posed in the survey was wrong. We do not need a change in the law to allow for terminally ill or incurably ill patients to refuse treatment.

It is important to understand that there is no law medical group church or anti-euthanasia organsiation which insists on unnecessary, useless, heroic or unduly burdensome measures to keep a dying person alive. The right to refuse treatment is enshrined in the Health and Disability Act code of consumer’s Rights.

Code 7 Right to make an informed choice and give informed consent. In considering euthanasia it is important to recognise that euthanasia is about doctors killing their patients.

Euthanasia may be voluntary, involuntary or compulsory. If voluntarily administered by oneself, it is a form of suicide. If administered by another in an involuntary or compulsory way, it is a form of murder. If administered by another with the victims consent or cooperation it is both suicide and murder.

The question that should have been asked in the TV3 info poll is “Should the law allow doctors to kill their patients who are incurably ill or terminally ill or assist in their suicide when requested by their patients.”

If this question was the subject of an info poll it is believed that the result would have been substantially different and a genuine reflection of public opinion and support for the sanctity of life ethic and for upholding the 2400 year old Hippocratic tradition.

This tradition was reiterated in the World Medical Associations International Code of Ethics in 1941. It states “a doctor must always bear in mind the importance of preserving human life from the time of conception until death.”

This tradition is incorporated in the New Zealand Medical Association Code of Ethics. With respect to the dying patient it states “always bear in mind the obligation of preserving life, but allow death to occur with dignity and comfort when the death of the body appears to be inevitable.”

The NZMA in line with the World Medical Association states that euthanasia in unethical. Peter Brown MP the sponsor of the defeated Death with Dignity Bill claims that “Parliament did all New Zealanders a huge disservice by not allowing the matter to be formally debated.”

Right to Life disputes that conclusion. The first responsibility of Parliament is to protect the inalienable right to life of all New Zealanders from conception to natural death. Our right to life is conferred by our creator and not by Parliament.

The Crimes Act 1961 in section 158 prohibits Homicide the killing of a human being directly or indirectly by any means. Culpable homicide is either murder or manslaughter. Section 63 states that no one has the right to consent to be killed. It is also a crime to encourage or assist any person to commit suicide,

The state does not have authority to withdraw this legal protection from the incurably or terminally ill. The state therefore does not have authority to grant doctors the “right” to kill their patients or assist in their suicide.

Right to Life commends the sixty MPs who voted against the Death with Dignity Bill at its first reading. In doing so they gave recognition to the fact that this was a debate that Parliament should not be having. They have defended the integrity of Parliament and temporarily protected this nation from the scourge of euthanasia.

We should remember that the international euthanasia movement has eugenics as its objective. It is nothing to do with relief of pain. It was not meant to be voluntary and mercy is not its native. Its mainthrust was against the mentally ill.

We should recognise that abortion and euthanasia are connected and both come from a culture of death. Euthanasia will continue to threaten our society until Parliament provides effective legal protection for the right of life of unborn children who are being killed, sanctioned and funded by the state.

Right to life challenges those MPs who voted for the Death with Dignity Bill to support palliative care by encouraging the Government to make palliative care a core health service with full funding provided by the Government.

Ken Orr Spokesperson Right to Life New Zealand Inc

© Scoop Media

Parliament Headlines | Politics Headlines | Regional Headlines

Gordon Campbell: On The Peters/Ardern Triumph

There are a lot of good reasons to feel joyful about this outcome. It is what so many young voters – the best hope for the country’s future – wanted.

Far more important than the implications for the Economy Gods ( is the dollar up or down? ) last night’s outcome will also mean many, many vulnerable New Zealanders will have a better life over the next three years at least.

Yet the desire for change was in the majority, across the country..>>>More


Labour on its agreement |Peters: Post-Election Announcement Speech | Greenpeace “cautiously hopeful” about new Government | ACT - Madman on the loose | E tū ecstatic | Chamber welcomes the outcome | Greens on their joining Govt | EDS welcomes new govt | Immigrant groups worry | Feds ready to engage new coalition government | Labour Ministers of the Crown announced


Climate: Increasing Greenhouse Emissions Hit NZ

New Zealand is seeing impacts of excess greenhouse gas emissions in our climate and oceans, according to the latest national report from the Ministry for the Environment and Stats NZ about the state of the atmosphere and climate…More>>


Wellington.Scoop: Arrests At Blockade Of "Weapons Expo"

“We encourage people in Wellington to get down to the Westpac Stadium now for a day of awesome peace action. There will be plenty of food, music and activities to keep us sustained through the day.” More>>


Rorschach Restructuring: PSA Taking Inland Revenue To Court Over Psychometrics

The Public Service Association will be seeing Inland Revenue in Employment Court over its intention to psychometrically test employees reapplying for their roles at the department as part of its controversial Business Transformation restructuring plan. More>>


Nuclear Disarmament: Nobel Peace Prize 2017 Awarded To ICAN

Congratulations from iCAN Aotearoa New Zealand to international iCAN, the other iCAN national campaigns and partner organisations, and the countless organisations and individuals who have worked so hard for a nuclear weapons-free world since 1945. More>>


Expenses: Waikato DHB CEO Resigns

An independent inquiry has identified that Dr Murray had spent more than the agreed $25K allocated for relocation costs, and other unauthorized expenses involving potential financial breaches of the chief executive’s obligations. More>>


Wellington.Scoop: Sad About The Trolley Buses?

The Regional Council’s MetLink is today spending money to tell us that it really loves Wellington’s trolley buses, even though they’re all being taken off our roads by the end of this month. More>>


Post-Election: Preliminary Coalition Talks Begin

New Zealand First will hold post-election preliminary discussions in Wellington with the National Party tomorrow morning and the Labour Party tomorrow afternoon. More>>




Featured InfoPages

Opening the Election