Gordon Campbell | Parliament TV | Parliament Today | News Video | Crime | Employers | Housing | Immigration | Legal | Local Govt. | Maori | Welfare | Unions | Youth | Search

 

'New' policy: unfair, unjust and unnecessary


'New' policy: unfair, unjust and unnecessary

Kia ora,

The government's 'new' framework for its foreshore and seabed legislation was released today; the legislation is be introduced tomorrow. It is a continuation of the government's approach to the Court of Appeal ruling last June - unfair, unjust and unnecessary.

The substance remains the same as that outlined in the December Policy Framework - it is confiscatory, it denies access to the due process of law for Maori, and it is racially discriminatory in that only one group are to have their property and rights taken away. The rights of private landowners are preserved. The government retains the right to sell the foreshore and seabed through an Act of Parliament.

The framework continues the misleading myth making the government has been engaged in since last June - the first of the government's guiding principles is again stated as: "the principle of access: the foreshore and seabed should be public domain, with open access and use for all New Zealanders". This is a total denial of reality - private landowners, commercial enterprise, and government agencies have restricted 'open' public access to, and use of, the foreshore and seabed for the past hundred years or more. It reinforces the deception that only Crown ownership will permit access. And again Maori are apparently excluded from "all New Zealanders" - clearly they are not to have 'open access' to what is rightfully theirs.

Selected quotes from the Waitangi Tribunal WAI 1071 Report are used to justify the Framework - a particularly perverted use of the Report as the Tribunal's "primary and strong" recommendation to the government was that they should "go back to the drawing board and engage in proper negotiations about the way forward" with Maori. The Tribunal found that the policy breaches the Treaty of Waitangi in "fundamental and serious" ways which give rise to "serious prejudice".

Further ... "beyond the Treaty, the policy fails in terms of wider norms of domestic and international law that underpin good government in a modern, democratic state. These include the rule of law, and the principles of fairness and non-discrimination." The Tribunal did not seek "to suggest changes to the details of the policy, as we think changes to details would not redeem it." It is difficult to imagine how anyone who has actually read the WAI 1071 Report could find anything within it to justify the 'new' Framework - were the Report quotes used as a continuation of the government's deceptive and dishonest response to Court of Appeal ruling? or in petty revenge because the Tribunal maintained its statutory independence in assessing the policy?

What is new about the Framework are some of its more bizarre aspects, including newly manufactured (and essentially meaningless) phrases such as "full territorial customary right" ... and of course the rather surreal and definitely absurd new concept (previously unheard of in law) - "An applicant group may seek a declaration by the Court that the cumulative bundle of rights to which they would have been entitled over an area of the foreshore and seabed would have amounted to a full territorial customary right had the legislation not vested the full beneficial ownership in the Crown."!

If you would like to read the Framework, it is available at http://www.beehive.govt.nz/Documents/Files/Foreshore-Seabed-Framework-Synopsis-070404.pdf The associated government press releases are at http://www.beehive.govt.nz/foreshore/home.cfm

For preliminary comment, 'The Crown Baselines for Legislation on the Foreshore and Seabed' by Moana Jackson is available at http://www.converge.org.nz/pma/fs010404.htm Further analysis by Moana Jackson will be available in the next couple of days.

Also available is 'Analysis of April Foreshore and Seabed Framework' by Te Ope Mana a Tai at http://www.converge.org.nz/pma/fs070404.doc and 'A few personal comments on the "new" foreshore/seabed policy' by David Williams at http://www.converge.org.nz/pma/fs070404a.htm

There is a selection of new media releases at http://www.converge.org.nz/pma/fsinfo.htm#rele and media reports at http://www.converge.org.nz/pma/fsinfo.htm#medi The Foreshore and seabed information page at http://www.converge.org.nz/pma/fsinfo.htm is being updated every day at present.

The WAI 1071 Report is available at http://www.waitangi-tribunal.govt.nz/reports/generic/wai1071foreshore/

© Scoop Media

 
 
 
Parliament Headlines | Politics Headlines | Regional Headlines

PM's Press Conference: Pike Re-Entry Agency

At today's post-cabinet press conference Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern was joined by Minister Responsible for Pike River Re-entry Andrew Little to announce plans for the new agency for re-entry of the mine.

The Pike River Recovery Agency, Te Kahui Whakamana Rua Tekau ma Iwa, will be officially established on 31 January 2018 and will work with the Pike River families with the intention of manned entry of the drift before March 2019. More>>

 

Foreign Affairs: Patrick Gower Interviews Jacinda Ardern

Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern says discussions have already begun on how to bring climate change refugees into New Zealand under a Pacific seasonal employment plan... More>>

ALSO:

Gordon Campbell: On The Centre Right’s Love Of ‘Nanny State’

You’d almost think it was 2005 again. That was a time when the rugged individualists of the centre-right were being beset by government regulations on the nature of light-bulbs, the size of shower heads, the junk food available at school tuck shops and other such essentials... More>>

Speaking Of Transport: Public Engagement On Wellington Scenarios

“Our work on possible solutions for Wellington’s transport future is ongoing, but has progressed to the stage where we’re ready to share our ideas with the public and seek their feedback to help guide our next steps...” More>>

ALSO:

Parental Leave: National's Time-Sharing Change Fails

National has proposed a change to the Parental Leave and Employment Protection Amendment Bill that would allow both parents to take paid parental leave at the same time, if that is what suits them best. More>>

ALSO:

Train Free Thursday: Workers Strike To Defend Terms Of Employment

"They signed up to these conditions a year ago when they got the contract for Wellington's rail services. Now they're trying to increase profits by squeezing frontline workers." More>>

ALSO:

Seclusion: Ombudsman Emphasises Importance Of Monitoring

Disability Rights Commissioner Paula Tesoriero says that while there have been changes to the Education (Update) Amendment Act 2017 to prohibit the use of seclusion, the report is an important reminder of the importance of regular monitoring of schools. More>>

ALSO:

 
 
 
 
 

LATEST HEADLINES

  • PARLIAMENT
  • POLITICS
  • REGIONAL
 
 

Featured InfoPages

Opening the Election