Gordon Campbell | Parliament TV | Parliament Today | News Video | Crime | Employers | Housing | Immigration | Legal | Local Govt. | Maori | Welfare | Unions | Youth | Search


Monarchist League of New Zealand

Monarchist League of New Zealand

23rd May 2004

The oath of allegiance is a short and dignified statement of loyalty to the constitutional order. It involves affirming loyalty to the Queen of New Zealand. This does not mean that we do not owe allegiance to New Zealand, for the oath is to the Queen in her constitutional position as Sovereign of New Zealand.

It may be that the oath of allegiance for new citizens in Australia no longer refers to the Queen. But this was a change motivated by the republican campaign then raging in that country and was bitterly fought by supporters of the constitutional status quo.

Do we want to emphasise New Zealand's independence by denigrating the constitutional role of the Queen and the Crown, one of the few unifying elements in this country which is above racial and political controversy?

An oath of loyalty to New Zealand would be constitutionally meaningless, impressive though it might appear to be in a shallow way. The concept of such an oath is at odds with a national culture which finds saluting the flag of even flying the flag difficult.

The nature of the oath of allegiance is better understood in the uniformed services. The police oath is a good example of why the current oaths are important.

Constables swear to uphold the Queen's peace. This ancient concept is based upon the idea that the Crown maintains and preserves law and order.

It also emphasises that the constable's duty is to the law and not to the Government or any sector or group.

In his address to the Golden Jubilee parade in Auckland just over a year ago, the Commissioner of Police drew attention to the policeman's oath and emphasised its practical importance.

Public office holders, and members of the Armed Forces, also swear an oath of allegiance. This is not understood as a pledge of purely personal loyalty (though this forms a part), but rather as loyalty to the office of Sovereign, and to the constitutional system which it represents.

This is far more meaningful than a vague pledge of loyalty to the country, which has been used in a number of countries to justify military coups. Loyalty is to the Sovereign, who holds the supreme constitutional office in trust for the people, not to the Government of the day. Governments come and go, but the Crown remains.

Oaths are taken seriously by the armed forces, which appreciate that their allegiance is to the Queen of New Zealand, not to the Government, although it is from that they receive their orders.

Like the Commissioner of Police, at the Golden Jubilee parade in October 2002 the Chief of Naval Staff emphasises the importance of the relationship of between the armed services and the Crown.

New citizens ought also to take an oath of allegiance to the existing constitutional structure. This structure may be changed by law as the oath recognises, but we all owe our allegiance to the constitutional government.

Politicians also serve in the Queen's name; it is the Queen's Government of which they form a part.

Removing the Crown without referendum, which is what numerous recent changes have been designed to do, is improper. Public support for change is clearly absent, since some 70 per cent of people support the retention of the constitutional monarchy which has given us peace and democracy for so long.

The real motivation for abolishing or eviscerating the oath of allegiance is republicanism. To suggest that removing reference to the Queen would emphasise New Zealand's independence is spurious. It could be seen as another slight to the Queen, and as offensive to those Maori people who appreciate the personal link between Maori and Crown.

The constitutional position of the Crown is particularly important because of the Treaty of Waitangi. It is also at the core of our political, legal and constitutional heritage.

Abolishing the oath of allegiance would be another example of an ongoing programme to reform the constitution without a referendum.

Dr Noel Cox


Monarchist League of New Zealand Inc


© Scoop Media

Parliament Headlines | Politics Headlines | Regional Headlines


Sector Opposes Bill: Local Government Bill Timeframe Extended

The Minister of Local Government Peseta Sam Lotu-Iiga has asked the Select Committee to extend the report back date for the Local Government Act 2002 Amendment Bill (No 2). More>>


Breed Laws Don’t Work: Vets On New National Dog Control Plan

It is pleasing therefore to see Louise Upston Associate Minister for Local Government calling for a comprehensive solution... However, relying on breed specific laws to manage dog aggression will not work. More>>


Not Waiting On Select Committee: Green Party Releases Medically-Assisted Dying Policy

“Adults with a terminal illness should have the right to choose a medically assisted death,” Green Party health spokesperson Kevin Hague said. “The Green Party does not support extending assisted dying to people who aren't terminally ill because we can’t be confident that this won't further marginalise the lives of people with disabilities." More>>


General Election Review: Changes To Electoral Act Introduced

More effective systems in polling places and earlier counting of advanced votes are on their way through proposed changes to our electoral laws, Justice Minister Amy Adams says. More>>

Gordon Campbell: On Our Posturing At The UN

In New York, Key basically took an old May 2 Washington Post article written by Barack Obama, recycled it back to the Americans, and still scored headlines here at home… We’ve had a double serving of this kind of comfort food. More>>


Treaty Settlements: Bills Delayed As NZ First Pulls Support

Ngāruahine, Te Atiawa and Taranaki are reeling today as they learnt that the third and final readings of each Iwi’s Historical Treaty Settlement Bills scheduled for this Friday, have been put in jeopardy by the actions of NZ First. More>>


Gordon Campbell: On The Damage De-Regulation Is Doing To Fisheries And Education, Plus Kate Tempest

Our faith in the benign workings of the market – and of the light-handed regulation that goes with it – has had a body count. Back in 1992, the free market friendly Health Safety and Employment Act gutted the labour inspectorate and turned forestry, mining and other workplace sites into death traps, long before the Pike River disaster. More>>

Get More From Scoop



Search Scoop  
Powered by Vodafone
NZ independent news