Gordon Campbell | Parliament TV | Parliament Today | News Video | Crime | Employers | Housing | Immigration | Legal | Local Govt. | Maori | Welfare | Unions | Youth | Search


Maxim Institute real issues. this week: No. 120

Maxim Institute real issues. this week: No. 120


* Civil Union Bills create new discrimination

* The faster you go the bigger the mess

* How far does freedom of speech extend?

* Change Agent workshops in Nelson and Napier

Civil Union Bills create new discrimination

It is claimed that the purpose of the Civil Union Bills is to remove 'unjust' discrimination suffered by couples who are not married. But the Bills actually create a new kind of discrimination.

Under the proposed legislation a civil union will be subject to the same legal requirements and have the same privileges as marriage. But couples in a de facto relationship will gain the benefits of marriage without many of the responsibilities. For example, they will not be subject to the same dissolution (divorce) procedures or maintenance requirements. So the benefits and privileges of marriage will be available to people who have made no public commitment whatsoever.

This would discriminate against married couples and those in a civil union.

This reality exposes the fundamental flaw at the heart of the legislation. In legally treating all sexual relationships as equivalent, every type of relationship will be considered to have the same value to society, whether or not the couple buy into civil unions or marriage.

The government's stated objective to have 'neutral' laws on relationships. This is only possible, however, if the relationships themselves are the same.

In the attempt to create a level playing field, the measuring rod (i.e. marriage), is rendered meaningless. The government is dismissing marriage as offering any special value to society by treating all relationships the same as if they were marriage.

Submissions on the Civil Union and Relationships Bills are due in two weeks on 6 August. A simple guide to making a submission and information sheet on the Bills is available at: www.maxim.org.nz/cu/cu_active.html

Discuss this article in our on-line discussion forum: http://www.maxim.org.nz/discuss/?topic=120.1

The faster you go the bigger the mess

The Prime Minister's response to the accusation of speeding is more significant than the accusation itself: "It wasn't Helen Clark, private citizen, rushing to a rugby match. It was Helen Clark as Prime Minister with a set of public engagements for the day."

But Helen Clark or any other MP is not above the law, either as a private citizen, or an elected representative. Along with the police, they must obey the law like everybody else. That is fundamental to the social contract and the rule of law. There are exceptions; when life or property is in serious danger; but neither of these was the case last Saturday.

There are two serious issues here. The first is obvious. Helen Clark and the police have allegedly broken the law apparently for no just cause. The second is even more serious but less obvious.

The law exists for everyone's protection. Laws that do not get the public's respect will ultimately fail to work. In a democracy, public respect for law is absolutely critical. In the midst of an ongoing campaign to cut down speed on the roads this incident undermines that respect. While probably not intentional, the Prime Minister looks like she is placing herself above the law in light of her comment suggesting this was more acceptable because of her office, than as a private citizen.

Quite the reverse is true. The Prime Minister does not carry extra privileges but it might well be that the highest government office carries extra responsibilities.

Discuss this article in our on-line discussion forum: http://www.maxim.org.nz/discuss/?topic=120.2

How far does freedom of speech extend?

David Irving, the highly controversial pro-Nazi historian wants to visit New Zealand to voice his extreme views, and already the call is out for the government to deny him entry.

The question is not whether his views are despicable, but whether, among citizens who claim freedom of speech as a fundamental human right, he should be allowed to have his say.

In stable societies, extreme viewpoints have a way of losing traction when they are exposed to rational scrutiny by many people. By saying that Irving's views are so dangerous that he must not be heard at all, do we give him more credit than he deserves?

With all the talk about hate speech and the need for legislation to prevent this, we need to ask ourselves as a society: When is it appropriate to limit someone's right to voice their opinion?

A quote from Noam Chomsky is food for thought, "If we don't believe in freedom of expression for people we despise, we don't believe in it at all."

Discuss this article in our on-line discussion forum: http://www.maxim.org.nz/discuss/?topic=120.3

Change Agent workshops in Nelson and Napier

Are you concerned about the direction of policy and culture in New Zealand? Change Agents workshops will address current issues such as Civil Unions, education, prostitution and political correctness, as well as providing practical tips on how to effectively engage in processes of public policy and debate.

Workshops will be held in Napier on Monday 26 July and in Nelson on 4 August. For details visit: http://www.maxim.org.nz/main_pages/whatson_page/whatson.html


In the long run, the public interest depends on private virtue.

© Scoop Media

Parliament Headlines | Politics Headlines | Regional Headlines


Also, Loan Interest: Productivity Commission On Tertiary Education

Key recommendations include better quality control; making it easier for students to transfer between courses; abolishing University Entrance; enabling tertiary institutions to own and control their assets; making it easier for new providers to enter the system; and facilitating more and faster innovation by tertiary education providers... More>>


Higher Payments: Wellington Regional Council Becomes A Living Wage Employer

Councillor Sue Kedgley said she was delighted that the Wellington Regional Council unanimously adopted her motion to become a Living Wage employer, making it the first regional council in New Zealand to do so. More>>


Scoop Images:
Dame Patsy Reddy Sworn In As Governor-General

This morning Dame Patsy Reddy was sworn in as the New Zealand Realm’s 21st Governor-General. The ceremony began with a pōwhiri to welcome Dame Patsy and her husband Sir David Gascoigne to Parliament. More>>


Ruataniwha: DOC, Hawke's Bay Council Developer Take Supreme Court Appeal

The Department of Conservation and Hawke's Bay Regional Investment Company (HBRIC) are appealing to the Supreme Court over a conservation land swap which the Court of Appeal halted. More>>


With NZ's Marama Davidson: Women’s Flotilla Leaves Sicily – Heading For Gaza

Women representing 13 countries spanning five continents began their journey yesterday on Zaytouna-Oliva to the shores of Gaza, which has been under blockade since 2007. On board are a Nobel Peace Laureate, three parliamentarians, a decorated US diplomat, journalists, an Olympic athlete, and a physician. A list of the women with their background can be found here. More>>

Gordon Campbell: On The Key Style Of Crisis Management

At Monday’s post Cabinet press conference Key was in his finest wide- eyed “Problem? What problem?” mode. No, there wasn’t really a problem that top MPI officials had been at odds with each other over the meaning of the fisheries policy and how that policy should be pursued... More>>


Mt Roskill: Greens Will Not Stand In Likely Post-Goff By-Election

“The Green Party’s priority is changing the Government in 2017, and as part of that we’ve decided that we won’t stand a candidate in the probable Mt Roskill by-election... This decision shows the Memorandum of Understanding between Labour and the Green Party is working." More>>


Get More From Scoop



Search Scoop  
Powered by Vodafone
NZ independent news