Gordon Campbell | Parliament TV | Parliament Today | News Video | Crime | Employers | Housing | Immigration | Legal | Local Govt. | Maori | Welfare | Unions | Youth | Search


Maxim Institute real issues. this week: No. 120

Maxim Institute real issues. this week: No. 120


* Civil Union Bills create new discrimination

* The faster you go the bigger the mess

* How far does freedom of speech extend?

* Change Agent workshops in Nelson and Napier

Civil Union Bills create new discrimination

It is claimed that the purpose of the Civil Union Bills is to remove 'unjust' discrimination suffered by couples who are not married. But the Bills actually create a new kind of discrimination.

Under the proposed legislation a civil union will be subject to the same legal requirements and have the same privileges as marriage. But couples in a de facto relationship will gain the benefits of marriage without many of the responsibilities. For example, they will not be subject to the same dissolution (divorce) procedures or maintenance requirements. So the benefits and privileges of marriage will be available to people who have made no public commitment whatsoever.

This would discriminate against married couples and those in a civil union.

This reality exposes the fundamental flaw at the heart of the legislation. In legally treating all sexual relationships as equivalent, every type of relationship will be considered to have the same value to society, whether or not the couple buy into civil unions or marriage.

The government's stated objective to have 'neutral' laws on relationships. This is only possible, however, if the relationships themselves are the same.

In the attempt to create a level playing field, the measuring rod (i.e. marriage), is rendered meaningless. The government is dismissing marriage as offering any special value to society by treating all relationships the same as if they were marriage.

Submissions on the Civil Union and Relationships Bills are due in two weeks on 6 August. A simple guide to making a submission and information sheet on the Bills is available at: www.maxim.org.nz/cu/cu_active.html

Discuss this article in our on-line discussion forum: http://www.maxim.org.nz/discuss/?topic=120.1

The faster you go the bigger the mess

The Prime Minister's response to the accusation of speeding is more significant than the accusation itself: "It wasn't Helen Clark, private citizen, rushing to a rugby match. It was Helen Clark as Prime Minister with a set of public engagements for the day."

But Helen Clark or any other MP is not above the law, either as a private citizen, or an elected representative. Along with the police, they must obey the law like everybody else. That is fundamental to the social contract and the rule of law. There are exceptions; when life or property is in serious danger; but neither of these was the case last Saturday.

There are two serious issues here. The first is obvious. Helen Clark and the police have allegedly broken the law apparently for no just cause. The second is even more serious but less obvious.

The law exists for everyone's protection. Laws that do not get the public's respect will ultimately fail to work. In a democracy, public respect for law is absolutely critical. In the midst of an ongoing campaign to cut down speed on the roads this incident undermines that respect. While probably not intentional, the Prime Minister looks like she is placing herself above the law in light of her comment suggesting this was more acceptable because of her office, than as a private citizen.

Quite the reverse is true. The Prime Minister does not carry extra privileges but it might well be that the highest government office carries extra responsibilities.

Discuss this article in our on-line discussion forum: http://www.maxim.org.nz/discuss/?topic=120.2

How far does freedom of speech extend?

David Irving, the highly controversial pro-Nazi historian wants to visit New Zealand to voice his extreme views, and already the call is out for the government to deny him entry.

The question is not whether his views are despicable, but whether, among citizens who claim freedom of speech as a fundamental human right, he should be allowed to have his say.

In stable societies, extreme viewpoints have a way of losing traction when they are exposed to rational scrutiny by many people. By saying that Irving's views are so dangerous that he must not be heard at all, do we give him more credit than he deserves?

With all the talk about hate speech and the need for legislation to prevent this, we need to ask ourselves as a society: When is it appropriate to limit someone's right to voice their opinion?

A quote from Noam Chomsky is food for thought, "If we don't believe in freedom of expression for people we despise, we don't believe in it at all."

Discuss this article in our on-line discussion forum: http://www.maxim.org.nz/discuss/?topic=120.3

Change Agent workshops in Nelson and Napier

Are you concerned about the direction of policy and culture in New Zealand? Change Agents workshops will address current issues such as Civil Unions, education, prostitution and political correctness, as well as providing practical tips on how to effectively engage in processes of public policy and debate.

Workshops will be held in Napier on Monday 26 July and in Nelson on 4 August. For details visit: http://www.maxim.org.nz/main_pages/whatson_page/whatson.html


In the long run, the public interest depends on private virtue.

© Scoop Media

Parliament Headlines | Politics Headlines | Regional Headlines

Werewolf: What Does Winston Peters Want His Legacy To Be?

A lot of people in New Zealand seem to resent Winston Peters and the power that he appears to have. “Appears” being the operative word. In reality, Peters will have power only up to the point that he uses it.

By next week, he’ll have become just another junior player in an MMP governing arrangement, battling to hold onto the gains he was promised. More>>


Rising Toll: Road Safety Needs To Be A Higher Priority

Official advice released to the Green Party under the Official Information Act shows that the previous National Government dismissed an option to make road safety its most important transport priority after being told the road toll was rising. More>>


Wellington.Scoop: Arrests At Blockade Of "Weapons Expo"

“We encourage people in Wellington to get down to the Westpac Stadium now for a day of awesome peace action. There will be plenty of food, music and activities to keep us sustained through the day.” More>>


Rorschach Restructuring: PSA Taking Inland Revenue To Court Over Psychometrics

The Public Service Association will be seeing Inland Revenue in Employment Court over its intention to psychometrically test employees reapplying for their roles at the department as part of its controversial Business Transformation restructuring plan. More>>


Nuclear Disarmament: Nobel Peace Prize 2017 Awarded To ICAN

Congratulations from iCAN Aotearoa New Zealand to international iCAN, the other iCAN national campaigns and partner organisations, and the countless organisations and individuals who have worked so hard for a nuclear weapons-free world since 1945. More>>


Expenses: Waikato DHB CEO Resigns

An independent inquiry has identified that Dr Murray had spent more than the agreed $25K allocated for relocation costs, and other unauthorized expenses involving potential financial breaches of the chief executive’s obligations. More>>


Wellington.Scoop: Sad About The Trolley Buses?

The Regional Council’s MetLink is today spending money to tell us that it really loves Wellington’s trolley buses, even though they’re all being taken off our roads by the end of this month. More>>


Post-Election: Preliminary Coalition Talks Begin

New Zealand First will hold post-election preliminary discussions in Wellington with the National Party tomorrow morning and the Labour Party tomorrow afternoon. More>>




Featured InfoPages

Opening the Election