Gordon Campbell | Parliament TV | Parliament Today | News Video | Crime | Employers | Housing | Immigration | Legal | Local Govt. | Maori | Welfare | Unions | Youth | Search

 


What happened to reform of agricultural trade?

The draft WTO framework: what happened to reform of agricultural trade?


In a detailed analysis released today, international agency Oxfam is sharply critical of the draft framework for negotiations set to be discussed at next week’s General Council meeting of the World Trade Organisation (WTO).

“This draft is a major disappointment. It makes little progress towards making trade fairer to the majority of WTO members, especially on the crucial issue of agriculture,” said Barry Coates, Executive Director of Oxfam New Zealand. “It has long been recognised that dumping of heavily subsidised agricultural products on world markets is the major problem that these negotiations were meant to solve. It is a life and death issue for millions of rural poor in the developing world. The fact that this framework fails to deliver on this issue is nothing short of scandalous.”

Oxfam’s analysis shows that the draft text on agriculture, prepared by New Zealand Chair Tim Groser, heavily favours the EU and the US as the world’s subsidy superpowers, at the expense of both developing nations and agricultural exporting countries like New Zealand.

“Instead of pushing forward with the stated intention of the Doha Development Agenda to require rich countries to decrease and eliminate their trade-distorting subsidies, the text creates two new massive loopholes which invite exploitation by rich country governments eager to keep subsidies in place and their markets protected from competition,” commented Coates on releasing Oxfam’s analysis.

The first of these loopholes is a new category of subsidy tacked onto the so-called “blue box” of permissible domestic support. This box was created as a transition measure during the Uruguay round of talks and until recently discussions in the current talks centred on finding ways to eliminate it.

“The proposed widening of the blue box not only gives it a new lease of life, but also seems tailor-made to permit the United States to reclassify and legitimise illegal subsidies,” said Coates. “The recent hard-won victory of Brazil against the massive subsidies paid to US cotton barons is a case in point. The WTO ruling requiring these subsidies to be eliminated could well be rendered meaningless by the availability of a new bucket to pour the subsidies into.”

The second loophole is the newly-created concept of “sensitive products”, namely products which enjoy heavy subsidisation in the EU and other protectionist countries, such as Japan. This new category can be used to protect rich country domestic markets for such things as sugar, beef and dairy products from outside competition, something never contemplated in the Doha Mandate. The number of products eligible for this carve-out from tariff reduction commitments is likely to be extensive, as the text envisages that all of the hundreds of products currently subject to tariff rate quotas can become “sensitive products”.

The elaborate and extensive treatment of sensitive products is in sharp contrast to the vague language around special and differential treatment (S&DT), which is a make-or-break issue for developing countries. Despite the fact that S&DT is one of the central promises of the Doha Development Agenda, developing countries are left very much in the dark about what provision will be made for their food security and rural development needs.

“The Doha Development Agenda has been turned on its head by this draft framework,” said Coates. “Rich countries seem to have learned nothing from the failure of the talks at Cancun, which was caused by their unwillingness to accept that trade rules must be made fairer to the poor. Unless they face up to their obligation to stop dumping and to take account of developing country needs, they risk bringing the negotiations to a grinding halt.”


© Scoop Media

 
 
 
 
 
Parliament Headlines | Politics Headlines | Regional Headlines

 

Breed Laws Don’t Work: Vets On New National Dog Control Plan

It is pleasing therefore to see Louise Upston Associate Minister for Local Government calling for a comprehensive solution... However, relying on breed specific laws to manage dog aggression will not work. More>>

ALSO:

Corrections Corrected: Supreme Court Rules On Release Dates

Corrections has always followed the lawful rulings of the Court in its calculation of sentence release dates. On four previous occasions, the Court of Appeal had upheld Corrections’ practices in calculating pre-sentence detention. More>>

ALSO:

Not Waiting On Select Committee: Green Party Releases Medically-Assisted Dying Policy

“Adults with a terminal illness should have the right to choose a medically assisted death,” Green Party health spokesperson Kevin Hague said. “The Green Party does not support extending assisted dying to people who aren't terminally ill because we can’t be confident that this won't further marginalise the lives of people with disabilities." More>>

ALSO:

General Election Review: Changes To Electoral Act Introduced

More effective systems in polling places and earlier counting of advanced votes are on their way through proposed changes to our electoral laws, Justice Minister Amy Adams says. More>>

Gordon Campbell: On Our Posturing At The UN

In New York, Key basically took an old May 2 Washington Post article written by Barack Obama, recycled it back to the Americans, and still scored headlines here at home… We’ve had a double serving of this kind of comfort food. More>>

ALSO:

Treaty Settlements: Bills Delayed As NZ First Pulls Support

Ngāruahine, Te Atiawa and Taranaki are reeling today as they learnt that the third and final readings of each Iwi’s Historical Treaty Settlement Bills scheduled for this Friday, have been put in jeopardy by the actions of NZ First. More>>

ALSO:

Gordon Campbell: On The Damage De-Regulation Is Doing To Fisheries And Education, Plus Kate Tempest

Our faith in the benign workings of the market – and of the light-handed regulation that goes with it – has had a body count. Back in 1992, the free market friendly Health Safety and Employment Act gutted the labour inspectorate and turned forestry, mining and other workplace sites into death traps, long before the Pike River disaster. More>>

Get More From Scoop

 

LATEST HEADLINES

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Politics
Search Scoop  
 
 
Powered by Vodafone
NZ independent news