Gordon Campbell | Parliament TV | Parliament Today | News Video | Crime | Employers | Housing | Immigration | Legal | Local Govt. | Maori | Welfare | Unions | Youth | Search


Status Hearings research released

4 August 2004

Status Hearings research released

Reports published today by the Law Commission and Ministry of Justice examine current pre-trial criminal processes and suggest that reform is needed. The two publications are complementary.

Status Hearings Evaluation: A New Zealand Study of Pre-trial Hearings in Criminal Cases is a joint research study of status hearings by the Ministry of Justice and Law Commission. Status Hearings are pre-trial reviews held in most District Courts if defendants plead not guilty in summary criminal cases.

Reforming Criminal Pre-trial Processes, a Law Commission preliminary paper, discusses the research findings and proposes options for more efficient and fair processes. The Law Commission is seeking submissions on the proposed reforms and will present its final recommendations early in 2005.

Pre-trial hearings in the criminal jurisdiction are intended to reduce the incidence of cancelled and postponed proceedings, which are costly, disruptive and can cause considerable distress to the parties involved in the proceedings. Status hearings were a judicial initiative to solve these problems and to ensure defendants enter an informed plea to appropriate charges as soon as possible. However, the research suggests there is still room for improvement.

Status Hearings Evaluation: A New Zealand Study of Pre-trial Hearings in Criminal Cases looked at hearings in five District Courts, and callovers in one District Court. Interviews were held with defendants, complainants, judges, defence counsel, police prosecutors, victim advisers, caseflow managers and probation officers, and information was also obtained from the taped records of the courts.

Many participants thought status hearings meant a better use of resources overall, and a saving of time, especially defended hearing time. They were seen as encouraging early resolutions to a number of cases, reducing the stress of waiting for a defended hearing and producing better outcomes.

Hearings are seen as a focal point for case preparation by some counsel, and a number of participants found sentence indications to be helpful. They also provide an opportunity for complainants to have some input and be part of the process.

Although status hearings have led to some benefits, concerns were also voiced. The research suggests that a range of matters need to be addressed, including the need for more operational guidelines or statutory provisions on sentence indications, pre-status hearings plea and charge discussions, and the roles of participants. Also of vital importance is the issue of access to justice and rights for complainants and defendants, especially in relation to unrepresented defendants and Maori and Pacific Island participants.

Voicing conclusions drawn from Reforming Criminal Pre-trial Processes, Law Commission President Justice Robertson said, “it is clear that some of the problems status hearings were designed to mend still pervade the process, and that further changes to pre-trial processes are required, both to ensure fairness to complainants and defendants, and to reduce delays and make optimal use of Court and judicial resources.

“In short, the current system often fails witnesses, defendants and victims. It takes too long to get to trial and there are too many pre-trial meetings. There are insufficient incentives to secure the speedy resolution of everyone’s interests, and we need a new approach to make the process work more effectively.”

The key objective of pre-trial processes is to ensure that cases are dealt with expeditiously and efficiently, consistent with fundamental principles of fairness. Where people enter a guilty plea they should do so at the earliest practicable opportunity. Where cases proceed to trial, the issues should be identified well in advance so that the number of appearances before the judge is reduced to a minimum.

“Pre-trial processes must be designed to promote early consideration of evidence and charges laid, provision of adequate legal advice for defendants, early and full disclosure of the case, pre-trial discussion between prosecution and defence about the charges and facts, and early preparation of the defence case,” said Justice Robertson. The paper proposes a principled framework for pre-trial criminal processes consisting of an initial hearing, a standard adjournment for six weeks and a pre-trial hearing. Generally only two judicial hearings would be required before trial, and adjournments would only be granted if necessary to ensure the defendant receives a fair trial. The Law Commission welcomes submissions on the detailed proposals in their paper.

The Law Commission discussion paper Reforming Criminal Pre-trial Processes (Preliminary Paper 55) is available from www.lawcom.govt.nz

The joint research report Status Hearings Evaluation: A New Zealand Study of Pre-trial Hearings in Criminal Cases is available from www.justice.govt.nz


© Scoop Media

Parliament Headlines | Politics Headlines | Regional Headlines


Sector Opposes Bill: Local Government Bill Timeframe Extended

The Minister of Local Government Peseta Sam Lotu-Iiga has asked the Select Committee to extend the report back date for the Local Government Act 2002 Amendment Bill (No 2). More>>


Breed Laws Don’t Work: Vets On New National Dog Control Plan

It is pleasing therefore to see Louise Upston Associate Minister for Local Government calling for a comprehensive solution... However, relying on breed specific laws to manage dog aggression will not work. More>>


Not Waiting On Select Committee: Green Party Releases Medically-Assisted Dying Policy

“Adults with a terminal illness should have the right to choose a medically assisted death,” Green Party health spokesperson Kevin Hague said. “The Green Party does not support extending assisted dying to people who aren't terminally ill because we can’t be confident that this won't further marginalise the lives of people with disabilities." More>>


General Election Review: Changes To Electoral Act Introduced

More effective systems in polling places and earlier counting of advanced votes are on their way through proposed changes to our electoral laws, Justice Minister Amy Adams says. More>>

Gordon Campbell: On Our Posturing At The UN

In New York, Key basically took an old May 2 Washington Post article written by Barack Obama, recycled it back to the Americans, and still scored headlines here at home… We’ve had a double serving of this kind of comfort food. More>>


Treaty Settlements: Bills Delayed As NZ First Pulls Support

Ngāruahine, Te Atiawa and Taranaki are reeling today as they learnt that the third and final readings of each Iwi’s Historical Treaty Settlement Bills scheduled for this Friday, have been put in jeopardy by the actions of NZ First. More>>


Gordon Campbell: On The Damage De-Regulation Is Doing To Fisheries And Education, Plus Kate Tempest

Our faith in the benign workings of the market – and of the light-handed regulation that goes with it – has had a body count. Back in 1992, the free market friendly Health Safety and Employment Act gutted the labour inspectorate and turned forestry, mining and other workplace sites into death traps, long before the Pike River disaster. More>>

Get More From Scoop



Search Scoop  
Powered by Vodafone
NZ independent news