Gordon Campbell | Parliament TV | Parliament Today | News Video | Crime | Employers | Housing | Immigration | Legal | Local Govt. | Maori | Welfare | Unions | Youth | Search

 


Civil Unions Campaign rejects Worth's Amendment

Campaign for Civil Unions rejects Richard Worth’s sibling relationship amendment

Richard Worth’s proposed rewrite of the Civil Union Bill is a desperate attempt to undermine civil unions,” said Cameron Law, spokesperson for Campaign for Civil Unions today, reacting to the proposal by Worth to change the Civil Union Bill into a civil relationships registration system.

“Worth’s amendments reflect similar failed wrecking amendments in the recent United Kingdom Civil Partnerships debate. At heart they are simply an attempt to belittle the relationships of same-sex couples by suggesting they are no more significant than friendships.

“Civil Unions are designed to give recognition to loving, committed and intimate relationships between consenting adults, whether they are same-sex or different-sex couples. As drafted, the Civil Union Bill prohibits civil unions between family members, and allows people who are eligible to be married to change their civil union into a marriage if desired.

“Civil partnerships are designed to formalise relationships that do not meet the same criteria. Family members or carers could register such partnerships.

“Government is pursuing Civil Unions to deal with the fact that marriage will remain only available to different-sex couples. To end the discrimination against same-sex couples arising from this, civil unions have to be similar to marriage in the rights, obligations and criteria they require.

“Richard Worth’s proposals are simply designed to wreck the civil unions legislation, which is why they are receiving support from the same MPs who opposed the Civil Union Bill at first and second readings. They would change the intent of the Bill completely, and would require the wholesale rewriting of the companion Relationships (Statutory References) Bill as well.

“Similar tactics to these were used by Conservative members of Britain’s House of Lords in fighting the UK’s recent Civil Partnerships legislation (which was passed by the House of Commons by 389 votes to 47). A handful of the peers moved amendments to extend the new relationship recognition system to a broader range of people.

“These amendments, when proposed in the UK, were coupled with references to homosexuality as ‘unnatural sexual practice’ and lamentations about the ‘hijacking’ of the word gay. This is the sort of underlying homophobia that stands behind attempts to weaken the Civil Union Bill.

“One also has to ask where the mandate or demand for such a proposal is? No party had a registration system such as that Mr Worth is proposing in their manifesto, and there has been no community campaign for such a system. If Richard Worth sincerely believes there is a need for siblings or friends to register their relationships he can propose his own Bill and seek community support. We doubt he would get it.

“I call on the majority of MPs, who support Civil Unions, to vote against Richard Worth’s proposals. All they will do is entrench discrimination in the law, and introduce a civil partnership system for which there is no mandate or public demand,” Cameron Law said.

© Scoop Media

 
 
 
 
 
Parliament Headlines | Politics Headlines | Regional Headlines

 

Breed Laws Don’t Work: Vets On New National Dog Control Plan

It is pleasing therefore to see Louise Upston Associate Minister for Local Government calling for a comprehensive solution... However, relying on breed specific laws to manage dog aggression will not work. More>>

ALSO:

Corrections Corrected: Supreme Court Rules On Release Dates

Corrections has always followed the lawful rulings of the Court in its calculation of sentence release dates. On four previous occasions, the Court of Appeal had upheld Corrections’ practices in calculating pre-sentence detention. More>>

ALSO:

Not Waiting On Select Committee: Green Party Releases Medically-Assisted Dying Policy

“Adults with a terminal illness should have the right to choose a medically assisted death,” Green Party health spokesperson Kevin Hague said. “The Green Party does not support extending assisted dying to people who aren't terminally ill because we can’t be confident that this won't further marginalise the lives of people with disabilities." More>>

ALSO:

General Election Review: Changes To Electoral Act Introduced

More effective systems in polling places and earlier counting of advanced votes are on their way through proposed changes to our electoral laws, Justice Minister Amy Adams says. More>>

Gordon Campbell: On Our Posturing At The UN

In New York, Key basically took an old May 2 Washington Post article written by Barack Obama, recycled it back to the Americans, and still scored headlines here at home… We’ve had a double serving of this kind of comfort food. More>>

ALSO:

Treaty Settlements: Bills Delayed As NZ First Pulls Support

Ngāruahine, Te Atiawa and Taranaki are reeling today as they learnt that the third and final readings of each Iwi’s Historical Treaty Settlement Bills scheduled for this Friday, have been put in jeopardy by the actions of NZ First. More>>

ALSO:

Gordon Campbell: On The Damage De-Regulation Is Doing To Fisheries And Education, Plus Kate Tempest

Our faith in the benign workings of the market – and of the light-handed regulation that goes with it – has had a body count. Back in 1992, the free market friendly Health Safety and Employment Act gutted the labour inspectorate and turned forestry, mining and other workplace sites into death traps, long before the Pike River disaster. More>>

Get More From Scoop

 

LATEST HEADLINES

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Politics
Search Scoop  
 
 
Powered by Vodafone
NZ independent news