Gordon Campbell | Parliament TV | Parliament Today | News Video | Crime | Employers | Housing | Immigration | Legal | Local Govt. | Maori | Welfare | Unions | Youth | Search

 


Appeals To Privy Council Ruled Illegal

Thu, 10 Feb 2005

Abolition Of Jamaican Appeals To Privy Council Ruled Illegal

"The Privy Council ruled on 3 February 2005 that the purported enactment by the Parliament of Jamaica of three bills intended to abolish the right of appeal to the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council was unconstitutional", said a spokesperson for the Campaign for the Privy Council.

The passage of the bills did not follow the procedure required by the Constitution of Jamaica. A bill intended to alter an entrenched provision of the Constitution must wait for a period of at least six months after being introduced in the House of Representatives. Only then can it be passed by both the House of Representatives and the Senate with the votes of not less than two-thirds of all the members of Parliament.

Two of the three bills, which had the effect of altering entrenched provisions of the Constitution, were passed without the required two-thirds majorities. The Privy Council held that the first bill, abolishing the right of appeal to Her Majesty in Council, did not alter an entrenched provision, but could not be separated from the other two bills and hence should also have been passed by a two-thirds majority.

The other two bills related to the establishment of a Caribbean Court of Justice.

The spokesperson for the Campaign for the Privy Council pointed out that "The Privy Council's ruling in the Jamaican case is a reminder of the continuing need for a Commonwealth-wide appeal court. The Privy Council decision has strengthened the Constitution of Jamaica, and the rule of law. New Zealand does not have a written constitution.

It is therefore even more important for this country to have access to an independent arbiter of constitutional propriety and common sense. The Privy Council is internationally recognised for its experience, technical skill, and freedom to make decisions without fear or favour.

It is a matter of regret that the Supreme Court Act was passed by the Parliament of New Zealand by a narrow majority of 62 votes to 52, a long way short of a two-thirds majority of all of the members of the House of Representatives".

ENDS

© Scoop Media

 
 
 
 
 
Parliament Headlines | Politics Headlines | Regional Headlines

 

Breed Laws Don’t Work: Vets On New National Dog Control Plan

It is pleasing therefore to see Louise Upston Associate Minister for Local Government calling for a comprehensive solution... However, relying on breed specific laws to manage dog aggression will not work. More>>

ALSO:

Corrections Corrected: Supreme Court Rules On Release Dates

Corrections has always followed the lawful rulings of the Court in its calculation of sentence release dates. On four previous occasions, the Court of Appeal had upheld Corrections’ practices in calculating pre-sentence detention. More>>

ALSO:

Not Waiting On Select Committee: Green Party Releases Medically-Assisted Dying Policy

“Adults with a terminal illness should have the right to choose a medically assisted death,” Green Party health spokesperson Kevin Hague said. “The Green Party does not support extending assisted dying to people who aren't terminally ill because we can’t be confident that this won't further marginalise the lives of people with disabilities." More>>

ALSO:

General Election Review: Changes To Electoral Act Introduced

More effective systems in polling places and earlier counting of advanced votes are on their way through proposed changes to our electoral laws, Justice Minister Amy Adams says. More>>

Gordon Campbell: On Our Posturing At The UN

In New York, Key basically took an old May 2 Washington Post article written by Barack Obama, recycled it back to the Americans, and still scored headlines here at home… We’ve had a double serving of this kind of comfort food. More>>

ALSO:

Treaty Settlements: Bills Delayed As NZ First Pulls Support

Ngāruahine, Te Atiawa and Taranaki are reeling today as they learnt that the third and final readings of each Iwi’s Historical Treaty Settlement Bills scheduled for this Friday, have been put in jeopardy by the actions of NZ First. More>>

ALSO:

Gordon Campbell: On The Damage De-Regulation Is Doing To Fisheries And Education, Plus Kate Tempest

Our faith in the benign workings of the market – and of the light-handed regulation that goes with it – has had a body count. Back in 1992, the free market friendly Health Safety and Employment Act gutted the labour inspectorate and turned forestry, mining and other workplace sites into death traps, long before the Pike River disaster. More>>

Get More From Scoop

 

LATEST HEADLINES

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Politics
Search Scoop  
 
 
Powered by Vodafone
NZ independent news