Gordon Campbell | Parliament TV | Parliament Today | News Video | Crime | Employers | Housing | Immigration | Legal | Local Govt. | Maori | Welfare | Unions | Youth | Search

 


Mayor Promotes Civil Union Pantomime

Press Release
28 April 2004

MAYOR PROMOTES CIVIL UNION PANTOMIME

Children need to experience the committed love of a mother and a father, NOT witness “a couple of old buggers tying the knot” in a “civil union” in order to try and legitimise buggery so they can be media “poster boys” in the promotion of “gay” couple’s ‘rights’ to adopt children.

The Mayor of Wellington, Kerry Prendergast, plans to ‘marry’ “a couple of old buggers” on Sunday 1 May in a “civil union” ceremony in the Wellington City Council Chambers, followed by a parade in Civic Square celebrating “sexual diversity” (i.e. homosexuality/buggery and other perversions). This pathetic parasitic pantomime of a ceremony she will preside over as a registered civil union celebrant, seeks to give effect to a law that its “gay” promoters say recognises that same sex couples should be treated as “equal” under the law to heterosexual couples who are married. For example, the sexual relationship of a man who regularly has anal sex and “fisting” sessions with his partner, as well as enjoys group sex with younger men in gay bars, is somehow declared the same in nature and in principle to the life affirming love expressed by a committed married heterosexual couple with or without children. Such delusional thinking is reminiscent of that of a certain emperor and his new ‘clothes’.

But why spoil the ‘fun’ of “a couple of old buggers” by calling their special ‘marriage’ ceremony a “parasitic pantomime”? Because the comparison is perfectly valid. There is every reason to assess it as a farce: a sad attempt to try and treat same sex relationships as equivalent to those involving married heterosexuals.

Marriage, an institution recognised by the state and predating the state, can only by definition involve a relationship between opposite sex partners – one man and one woman – who under the marriage (social) contract become husband and wife. Any eligible committed heterosexual couple who wants to get their relationship recognised in law can do so by visiting a Registry Office. The marriage contract can be entered into without any reference to religion.

Marriage involves justifiable discrimination in law as it recognises the fundamental differences between males and females and the fact that only from the union of opposite-sex partners can children be born into a committed loving relationship where their rights to have a father and a mother are met. A wealth of social science research shows that they develop best within a stable, loving marriage involving a mother and a father.

A civil union mimics marriage in almost every feature including: a form of ‘solemnisation procedure’ (the terms “husband” and “wife” are replaced with “civil union partner”), the requirement of a state -sanctioned celebrant and witnesses, dissolution procedures etc. and yet the Bill’s supporters claim its intention is to cast aside the cultural baggage associated with marriage. This is totally dishonest.

A civil union is clearly designed as “marriage for same-sex couples”. It is an unnatural parasite that draws its sustenance entirely from the virtues that undergird committed marriage (sexual fidelity, faithfulness etc.). Society is under no legal obligation to provide sanction to any form of sexual intimacy outside marriage! It has a moral duty to uphold and strengthen marriage and not endorse parasitic mimics that in law have no real meaning.

Nothing in the Human Rights Act 1993 requires the state to open marriage up to opposite sex couples. (the limitations placed on entry based on gender is a justifiable limitation under section 5 of the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990), or invent some new form of ‘relationship recognition’ based on intimate sexual activity outside of marriage (e.g. same-sex relationships, paedophilia, polygamy).

ENDS

© Scoop Media

 
 
 
 
 
Parliament Headlines | Politics Headlines | Regional Headlines

 

Breed Laws Don’t Work: Vets On New National Dog Control Plan

It is pleasing therefore to see Louise Upston Associate Minister for Local Government calling for a comprehensive solution... However, relying on breed specific laws to manage dog aggression will not work. More>>

ALSO:

Corrections Corrected: Supreme Court Rules On Release Dates

Corrections has always followed the lawful rulings of the Court in its calculation of sentence release dates. On four previous occasions, the Court of Appeal had upheld Corrections’ practices in calculating pre-sentence detention. More>>

ALSO:

Not Waiting On Select Committee: Green Party Releases Medically-Assisted Dying Policy

“Adults with a terminal illness should have the right to choose a medically assisted death,” Green Party health spokesperson Kevin Hague said. “The Green Party does not support extending assisted dying to people who aren't terminally ill because we can’t be confident that this won't further marginalise the lives of people with disabilities." More>>

ALSO:

General Election Review: Changes To Electoral Act Introduced

More effective systems in polling places and earlier counting of advanced votes are on their way through proposed changes to our electoral laws, Justice Minister Amy Adams says. More>>

Gordon Campbell: On Our Posturing At The UN

In New York, Key basically took an old May 2 Washington Post article written by Barack Obama, recycled it back to the Americans, and still scored headlines here at home… We’ve had a double serving of this kind of comfort food. More>>

ALSO:

Treaty Settlements: Bills Delayed As NZ First Pulls Support

Ngāruahine, Te Atiawa and Taranaki are reeling today as they learnt that the third and final readings of each Iwi’s Historical Treaty Settlement Bills scheduled for this Friday, have been put in jeopardy by the actions of NZ First. More>>

ALSO:

Gordon Campbell: On The Damage De-Regulation Is Doing To Fisheries And Education, Plus Kate Tempest

Our faith in the benign workings of the market – and of the light-handed regulation that goes with it – has had a body count. Back in 1992, the free market friendly Health Safety and Employment Act gutted the labour inspectorate and turned forestry, mining and other workplace sites into death traps, long before the Pike River disaster. More>>

Get More From Scoop

 

LATEST HEADLINES

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Politics
Search Scoop  
 
 
Powered by Vodafone
NZ independent news