Scoop has an Ethical Paywall
Work smarter with a Pro licence Learn More

Gordon Campbell | Parliament TV | Parliament Today | News Video | Crime | Employers | Housing | Immigration | Legal | Local Govt. | Maori | Welfare | Unions | Youth | Search

 

Balance "about right" Hate Speech Inquiry told

Human Rights Commission
Media Release
5 May 2005

Balance "about right" Hate Speech Inquiry told

New Zealand has the balance "about right" in relation to the freedom of expression and the protection of minority and vulnerable groups, the Human Rights Commission told the Inquiry into Hate Speech today

"The vast majority of New Zealanders deplore hate speech and the harm it can cause individuals and groups. But legislation alone is limited in curbing the most harmful effects of hate speech. The Commission believes the promotion of positive relations between groups in society through education and public awareness are equally important," says Commissioner Judy McGregor.

New Zealand has ratified international covenants on both the right to freedom of expression and on the prevention of racial hatred, covering the incitement of hostility, violence and racial disharmony. It has also legislated domestically for freedom of expression in the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act, 1990, and against racial hatred in the Human Rights Act.

The Human Rights Act contains two sections dealing with the excitement and incitement of racial disharmony.

"Section 61 of the Human Rights Act, which deals with the excitement of racial disharmony, should be retained. It provides a precautionary framework for serious racial hatred and demonstrates the commitment of the legislature to vulnerable and disadvantaged groups and their protection from serious harm. This is despite the high threshold at which it takes effect.

Advertisement - scroll to continue reading

Are you getting our free newsletter?

Subscribe to Scoop’s 'The Catch Up' our free weekly newsletter sent to your inbox every Monday with stories from across our network.

"We believe that material must be assessed in the context in which it is made or published when deciding whether it is likely to excite racial disharmony," Dr McGregor says.

"However, deliberate or intentional incitement at the more serious end of the scale should be treated in the same way as any other criminal offence and accordingly we propose that section 131 of the Human Rights Act 1990 should be replaced by criminal legislation covering race, colour, nationality, religion, gender identity, sexual orientation, age or disability."

The New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990 has had the positive effect of progressively influencing law-makers, judges, policy-makers and public thinking about the importance of freedom of expression as a fundamental human right in a modern democracy. At the same time the present restraints on hate speech constitute a justifiable limitation under s.5 of the Bill of Rights.

ENDS

© Scoop Media

Advertisement - scroll to continue reading
 
 
 
Parliament Headlines | Politics Headlines | Regional Headlines

 
 
 
 
 
 
 

LATEST HEADLINES

  • PARLIAMENT
  • POLITICS
  • REGIONAL
 
 

InfoPages News Channels


 
 
 
 

Join Our Free Newsletter

Subscribe to Scoop’s 'The Catch Up' our free weekly newsletter sent to your inbox every Monday with stories from across our network.