|
Destiny Rallies Support in Kaitaia
Friday, 10 June 2005, 12:58 am
Press Release: Destiny New Zealand
|
DESTINY New Zealand
Political Party
PRESS STATEMENT
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
10 JUNE
2005
"Destiny Rallies Support in
Kaitaia"
Destiny New Zealand leader Richard Lewis
presented the party's 'empowering families' message to over
a hundred locals in Kaitaia last night.
"This year we face
the most important election of our lifetime because our
country is on course for a social crisis unless we give
priority and restore strength to the basic building blocks
of our society - New Zealand families".
Destiny New
Zealand's policies are wide-ranging but give priority to
strengthening families. To that end, the party has a
foundation policy that focuses on protecting, empowering and
prospering New Zealand families.
David Isaachsen -
Candidate for Northland and Ernest Morton - Candidate for Te
Tai Tokerau, were introduced at the meeting.
Next Saturday
(18th June) the party launches its election campaign at the
new TelstraClear Pacific Events Centre in Manukau
City.
© Scoop Media
Nanny National - Dotcomming The TPP - Feeling The Love For X Factor
First, They Came For Your Lightbulbs - Classics : Ernest and Celestine - Abortion, Against the Tide
Film: Gods and Monsters - Come Back, SR-71 Blackbird - Satire: Ars Tonga, Vita Brevis
The Complicatist : Bobby Bland R.I.P., Laura Marling

Gordon Campbell:
On Putting Profit Potential Ahead Of Human Potential
Does New Zealand – despite our claims to egalitarianism and everyone being equal before the law – treat the people engaged in tax evasion more leniently than the people who commit welfare fraud? Yes, we do.
Earlier research by Victoria University associate professor Lisa Marriott has shown that while both offences are of the same kind (financial crimes) and have the same victim (the government, and society) the two get treated very differently from a prosecution point of view...
This week, Marriott released the next stage of her research findings, which are entirely consistent with what went before. Apparently, the government agencies involved also treat tax offenders more leniently than they treat welfare offenders. More>>