Gordon Campbell | Parliament TV | Parliament Today | News Video | Crime | Employers | Housing | Immigration | Legal | Local Govt. | Maori | Welfare | Unions | Youth | Search

 


Imms v Gunson

IMMS v GUNSON AND IMMS (AS TRUSTEES OF THE ESTATE OF V I BANICEVICH) And Ors
SC 9/2006 [4 April 2006]

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW ZEALAND
SC 9/2006
[2006] NZSC 24

BETWEEN JOCELYN MARY IMMS
Applicant

AND CRAIG WESLEY GUNSON AND
JOCELYN MARY IMMS (AS
TRUSTEES OF THE ESTATE OF
VJERKOSLAV IVAN BANICEVICH)
First Respondents
AND CAMERON BANICEVICH AND DENE
BANICEVICH
Second Respondents
AND YVETTE BANICEVICH AND DONNA
DOE
Third Respondents

Court: Elias CJ, Blanchard and Anderson JJ
Counsel: A G Stuart for Applicant
S P Bryers for First Respondents
M C Black for Second Respondents
Judgment: 4 April 2006

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT
A. The application for leave to appeal is dismissed.

B. Costs to the second respondents, payable by the applicant, of $2,500.

REASONS

[1] This is an application for leave to appeal from a judgment of the Court of Appeal. This Court has considered the written submissions in support of and in opposition to this application and the submissions on behalf of the third respondents indicating that they abide this Court’s decision.

[2] The litigation is concerned with the estate of the late Vjerkoslav Ivan Banicevich who farmed land at Clarks Bay, Te Kopuru in Northland. The applicant, a daughter of the deceased, sought a variation of the will trusts under s 64 of the Trustee Act 1956 with a view to seeing three sections subdivided off the family farm for the benefit of herself and her two sisters. She also brought a Family Protection Act claim which failed in the High Court. The Court of Appeal set aside directions which the High Court had made under s 64.

[3] The Court of Appeal was of the opinion that the significant change to the will was more than mere management or administration, and that while it may well be in the best interests of the daughters it was arguably not in the best interests of the grandson beneficiaries.

[4] The circumstances of this case are very unusual. Their singularity leaves no room, in our opinion, for the applicant to contend that the appeal involves a matter of general or public importance or a matter of general commercial significance. Nor are we persuaded that a substantial miscarriage of justice may have occurred, or may occur unless the appeal is heard. The dismissal of the Family Protection Act claims undermines that ground.

[5] The conclusions expressed in the previous paragraph must lead to the dismissal of this application. As well, however, the applicant would have insurmountable jurisdictional hurdles. Section 64(1) allows the Court to make orders of the type mentioned herein only where such transaction is expedient in the management or administration of trust property or would be in the best interests of the persons beneficially interested under the trust. The relevant property is not the farm itself but the A shares and one-third of the B shares in the family company which holds title to the property. The trustees’ obligations under the will are to sell those shares, either to the second respondents in terms of the option, or to other purchasers if the option is not taken up. There is plainly ample power for the trustees to discharge that obligation without intervention by the Court. And, as the Court of Appeal noted, such intervention must be for the purposes of management or administration of the shares or such as would be in the best interests of the beneficiaries. It would be difficult indeed for the applicant to show relevant necessity or expediency to rewrite the will in the way suggested by the applicant.

Solicitors:
Webster Malcolm & Kilpatrick, Warkworth for Applicant
Pegg Ayton Gordon, Dargaville for First Respondents
Hammonds, Dargaville, for Second Respondents

ENDS

© Scoop Media

 
 
 
 
 
Parliament Headlines | Politics Headlines | Regional Headlines

 

Breed Laws Don’t Work: Vets On New National Dog Control Plan

It is pleasing therefore to see Louise Upston Associate Minister for Local Government calling for a comprehensive solution... However, relying on breed specific laws to manage dog aggression will not work. More>>

ALSO:

Corrections Corrected: Supreme Court Rules On Release Dates

Corrections has always followed the lawful rulings of the Court in its calculation of sentence release dates. On four previous occasions, the Court of Appeal had upheld Corrections’ practices in calculating pre-sentence detention. More>>

ALSO:

Not Waiting On Select Committee: Green Party Releases Medically-Assisted Dying Policy

“Adults with a terminal illness should have the right to choose a medically assisted death,” Green Party health spokesperson Kevin Hague said. “The Green Party does not support extending assisted dying to people who aren't terminally ill because we can’t be confident that this won't further marginalise the lives of people with disabilities." More>>

ALSO:

General Election Review: Changes To Electoral Act Introduced

More effective systems in polling places and earlier counting of advanced votes are on their way through proposed changes to our electoral laws, Justice Minister Amy Adams says. More>>

Gordon Campbell: On Our Posturing At The UN

In New York, Key basically took an old May 2 Washington Post article written by Barack Obama, recycled it back to the Americans, and still scored headlines here at home… We’ve had a double serving of this kind of comfort food. More>>

ALSO:

Treaty Settlements: Bills Delayed As NZ First Pulls Support

Ngāruahine, Te Atiawa and Taranaki are reeling today as they learnt that the third and final readings of each Iwi’s Historical Treaty Settlement Bills scheduled for this Friday, have been put in jeopardy by the actions of NZ First. More>>

ALSO:

Gordon Campbell: On The Damage De-Regulation Is Doing To Fisheries And Education, Plus Kate Tempest

Our faith in the benign workings of the market – and of the light-handed regulation that goes with it – has had a body count. Back in 1992, the free market friendly Health Safety and Employment Act gutted the labour inspectorate and turned forestry, mining and other workplace sites into death traps, long before the Pike River disaster. More>>

Get More From Scoop

 

LATEST HEADLINES

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Politics
Search Scoop  
 
 
Powered by Vodafone
NZ independent news