Gordon Campbell | Parliament TV | Parliament Today | News Video | Crime | Employers | Housing | Immigration | Legal | Local Govt. | Maori | Welfare | Unions | Youth | Search

 


Section 59 and fear of prosecution



Section 59 and fear of prosecution

Members of several organisations supporting repeal of Section 59 say there is little likelihood of parents being prosecuted if they lightly smack their children after a law change.

“Parents want the best for their children and more and more parents are choosing not to smack. Repeal of Section 59 is an opportunity for New Zealand families to put more effort into learning ways of disciplining their children that does not involve hitting,” says one of the group’s spokespeople, Beth Wood of UNICEF.

The group says there are already safeguards within the current system to minimise the risk of people being prosecuted.

“We expect police and CYF will exercise the same discretion they use now when investigating allegations of assault. Neither the court, nor CYF take action for a simple, one-off smack of a child. Each case is assessed individually and both agencies use their discretion in determining whether a case is trivial or not,” says Ms Wood.

Section 59 itself, is a defence able to be used by parents when they have been charged with assaulting their child. Police do not generally charge parents with assault when they have only lightly and occasionally smacked a child. There is almost always a much wider context.

For minor offences police have a range of options other than prosecution. These include warnings, cautions, and pre trial diversion. Complaints involving very minor assaults, particularly for parents/caregivers who have not come to police attention before, are generally dealt with through these options.

In addition, there is a common law defence available to parents who use force against a child to protect them from greater harm, (eg pulling a child away from a hot stove, or a passing car).

At present, members of the public do not generally contact police or CYF if they witness a simple, light, smack of a child. “We see no reason why this would change,” says the group.


Additional information

The Solicitor-General’s Prosecution Guidelines

Police and Crown prosecutors are guided by the Solicitor-General’s prosecution guidelines which say that a prosecution should only proceed where there is sufficient evidence and it is in the public interest. The prosecutor must also be satisfied that the evidence is sufficiently strong that a properly directed jury could find guilt proved beyond reasonable doubt.

When weighing up the public interest, factors to be considered by prosecutors are:
• Seriousness or triviality of the alleged offence (does it warrant criminal law intervention)
• The effect of the decision not to prosecute on public opinion
• Whether the prosecution might be counter-productive (e.g. the accused could be seen as a martyr by people who do not support repeal)
• The availability of any proper alternatives to prosecution Whether the consequences of any conviction would be unduly harsh and oppressive
• The attitude of the victim to the alleged offence to the prosecution.

Overall – prosecutions of one-off trivial offences are unlikely. The likely negative impact of a conviction on both a parent and a child, particularly if the charges relate to a minor incident, may outweigh the benefits of a prosecution.

Ends

© Scoop Media

 
 
 
 
 
Parliament Headlines | Politics Headlines | Regional Headlines

 

Breed Laws Don’t Work: Vets On New National Dog Control Plan

It is pleasing therefore to see Louise Upston Associate Minister for Local Government calling for a comprehensive solution... However, relying on breed specific laws to manage dog aggression will not work. More>>

ALSO:

Corrections Corrected: Supreme Court Rules On Release Dates

Corrections has always followed the lawful rulings of the Court in its calculation of sentence release dates. On four previous occasions, the Court of Appeal had upheld Corrections’ practices in calculating pre-sentence detention. More>>

ALSO:

Not Waiting On Select Committee: Green Party Releases Medically-Assisted Dying Policy

“Adults with a terminal illness should have the right to choose a medically assisted death,” Green Party health spokesperson Kevin Hague said. “The Green Party does not support extending assisted dying to people who aren't terminally ill because we can’t be confident that this won't further marginalise the lives of people with disabilities." More>>

ALSO:

General Election Review: Changes To Electoral Act Introduced

More effective systems in polling places and earlier counting of advanced votes are on their way through proposed changes to our electoral laws, Justice Minister Amy Adams says. More>>

Gordon Campbell: On Our Posturing At The UN

In New York, Key basically took an old May 2 Washington Post article written by Barack Obama, recycled it back to the Americans, and still scored headlines here at home… We’ve had a double serving of this kind of comfort food. More>>

ALSO:

Treaty Settlements: Bills Delayed As NZ First Pulls Support

Ngāruahine, Te Atiawa and Taranaki are reeling today as they learnt that the third and final readings of each Iwi’s Historical Treaty Settlement Bills scheduled for this Friday, have been put in jeopardy by the actions of NZ First. More>>

ALSO:

Gordon Campbell: On The Damage De-Regulation Is Doing To Fisheries And Education, Plus Kate Tempest

Our faith in the benign workings of the market – and of the light-handed regulation that goes with it – has had a body count. Back in 1992, the free market friendly Health Safety and Employment Act gutted the labour inspectorate and turned forestry, mining and other workplace sites into death traps, long before the Pike River disaster. More>>

Get More From Scoop

 

LATEST HEADLINES

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Politics
Search Scoop  
 
 
Powered by Vodafone
NZ independent news