Gordon Campbell | Parliament TV | Parliament Today | News Video | Crime | Employers | Housing | Immigration | Legal | Local Govt. | Maori | Welfare | Unions | Youth | Search

 

SPCS on Reservoir Dogs Game Ban

11 July 2006

SPCS on Reservoir Dogs Game Ban

The Society is pleased that the Office of Film and Literature Classification (see Scoop 7 July) has applied the censorship law correctly and banned the computer game Reservoir Dogs that is based on the Quentin Taranantino's ultra-violent sick film of the same name. However, the Society's president Mike Petrus says:

"The OFLC has a very poor track record when it it comes to applying the law correctly - in particular its failure to apply section 3 of the Films, Videos and Publications Classification Act 1993 (dealing with the definition of "objectionable" content) to films like Baise-Moi and Irreversible depicting sexual violence and large numbers of videos and DVDs where women are sexually degraded, demeaned and dehumanised."

The computer game Reservoir Dogs was banned says the OFLC because it: "TENDS to promote and support the infliction of extreme violence and extreme cruelty by encouraging the player to perform, and then by showcasing in slow motion, the most extreme forms of violence and brutality for the purpose of entertainment" [Emphasis added]. It was therefore classified "objectionable" under s. 3(2) of the Act, because it TENDED to promote or support one of the six specified activiities listed in s. 3(2) - in this case [torture, extreme violence]. The Courts have ruled that mere depiction of such activities is insufficient to have the publication deemed "objectionable" by censors. There must also be an arguable case extablished by the censors that the depiction "promotes or supports" OR TENDS to promote or support the activity (e.g. necrophilia, bestiality).

The Society has argued in a number of cases before the High Court and Court of Appeal, that the use of the word "TEND" in the Act means that legislatators clearly had in mind a LOW threshold with regard to establishing the required LEVEL of promotion or support. The OFLC and Film and Literature Board of Review have consistently rejected this view, arguing that the onus is on the Society, as the party seeking a more restrictive classification on review, in order to safeguard the public good; to demonstrate how the publication actually promotes or supports the listed activity (s. 3[2]). The OFLC and Review Board have regularly ignored their statutory duties to take FULL account of the TENDENCY of a publication to promote certain listed activities. In contrast, the Society has consistently and painstakingly demonstrated how films like Baise Moi TEND to promote sexual violence and deviancy.

It is ironic that the OFLC now bans Reservoir Dogs, on the basis of its TENDENCY to promote torture etc. and yet no proper consideration was given to the TENDENCY to promote or support the same activities in films like Baise-Moi, Irreversible, Visitor Q and a host of other highly controversial publications. For example, the Australian OFLC and Review Board banned Baise-Moi (refusing it classification) because of its high impact and gratuitous depiction of sexual violence and graphic violence, while our Chief Censor, Bill Hastings, took the view that his Office could not and should not ban it because it actually served the "public good" as entertainment and an information close-up window on brutal rape. He clearly beleves that the public need to see close-ups of sexual penetration in the contect of rape. The NZ Review Board took the same view and allowed it to screen in public cinemas as a standard R18 entertainment, following its consideration of the Society's review application.

All the sorts of activities depicted in Reservoir Dogs computer game (and film) are found in films like Baise-Moi, Irreversible and Visitor Q including slow motion replays of graphic violence, brains being blown out in slow motion while naked adults are gratuitously depicted involved in sex acts, and woman are raped, sexually mutilated and tortured for sexual gratification. So why is Mr Hastings so upset about Reservoir Dogs that he has seen fit to ban it but not ban Baise-Moi?

Presumably the Chief Censor Hastings, Bill Hastings, is concerned about the interactivity in computer games and the potential for continuous exposure through that interactivity that is viewed (as compared to a film screening) as increasing the impact of objectionable content. The Society shares these concerns but is not willing to all the OFLC's inconsistency to go unnoticed.

It remains appalled at the level of desensitisation that the Chief Censor and his Deputy have undergone over the ten years they have been watching and assessing hard core porn and graphic violence, witnessed in oparticular by their wilingness to allow large numbers of highly objectionable films, DVDs and videos to flood the home rental market and cinemas.

The fact that so-called "cult-films" like Reservoir Dogs are now being converted into computer games so younger and younger children and young people can be entertained by morally corrosive and toxic filth, is one more step in the wider dissemination and availability of corrupting and toxic deviancy. (It has been well-established from research in New Zealand that young children are regularly accessing R18 videos and computer games). It is noteworthy that Bill Hasting's Office had no problem clearing the film Reservoir Dogs as R18 entertainment some years ago.

Bill Hastings may well soon be faced with assessing the computer game version of Baise-Moi and Irreversible depicting sodomy and sexual violence among other things for entertainment purposes. Having already cleared both films for cinema screenings, is he going to now give the thumbs up for teenagers to view explicit and prolonged scenes of such content as game material?

ENDS


© Scoop Media

 
 
 
Parliament Headlines | Politics Headlines | Regional Headlines

Gordon Campbell: On The Peters/Ardern Triumph

There are a lot of good reasons to feel joyful about this outcome. It is what so many young voters – the best hope for the country’s future – wanted.

Far more important than the implications for the Economy Gods ( is the dollar up or down? ) last night’s outcome will also mean many, many vulnerable New Zealanders will have a better life over the next three years at least.

Yet the desire for change was in the majority, across the country..>>>More


Reaction

Labour on its agreement |Peters: Post-Election Announcement Speech | Greenpeace “cautiously hopeful” about new Government | ACT - Madman on the loose | E tū ecstatic | Chamber welcomes the outcome | Greens on their joining Govt | EDS welcomes new govt | Immigrant groups worry | Feds ready to engage new coalition government | Labour Ministers of the Crown announced

 

Climate: Increasing Greenhouse Emissions Hit NZ

New Zealand is seeing impacts of excess greenhouse gas emissions in our climate and oceans, according to the latest national report from the Ministry for the Environment and Stats NZ about the state of the atmosphere and climate…More>>

ALSO:


Wellington.Scoop: Arrests At Blockade Of "Weapons Expo"

“We encourage people in Wellington to get down to the Westpac Stadium now for a day of awesome peace action. There will be plenty of food, music and activities to keep us sustained through the day.” More>>

ALSO:

Rorschach Restructuring: PSA Taking Inland Revenue To Court Over Psychometrics

The Public Service Association will be seeing Inland Revenue in Employment Court over its intention to psychometrically test employees reapplying for their roles at the department as part of its controversial Business Transformation restructuring plan. More>>

ALSO:

Nuclear Disarmament: Nobel Peace Prize 2017 Awarded To ICAN

Congratulations from iCAN Aotearoa New Zealand to international iCAN, the other iCAN national campaigns and partner organisations, and the countless organisations and individuals who have worked so hard for a nuclear weapons-free world since 1945. More>>

ALSO:

Expenses: Waikato DHB CEO Resigns

An independent inquiry has identified that Dr Murray had spent more than the agreed $25K allocated for relocation costs, and other unauthorized expenses involving potential financial breaches of the chief executive’s obligations. More>>

ALSO:

Wellington.Scoop: Sad About The Trolley Buses?

The Regional Council’s MetLink is today spending money to tell us that it really loves Wellington’s trolley buses, even though they’re all being taken off our roads by the end of this month. More>>

ALSO:

Post-Election: Preliminary Coalition Talks Begin

New Zealand First will hold post-election preliminary discussions in Wellington with the National Party tomorrow morning and the Labour Party tomorrow afternoon. More>>

 
 
 
 
 

LATEST HEADLINES

  • PARLIAMENT
  • POLITICS
  • REGIONAL
 
 

Featured InfoPages

Opening the Election