Gordon Campbell | Parliament TV | Parliament Today | News Video | Crime | Employers | Housing | Immigration | Legal | Local Govt. | Maori | Welfare | Unions | Youth | Search

 

Marc My Words: What a tangled web we weave...

Marc My Words… 29 September 2006
Political comment
By
Marc Alexander
What a tangled web we weave….

When power becomes an end in itself, principle becomes an inconvenience to step around in much the same way as picnickers in high heels avoid cow pats. But sooner rather than later you might succeed in circumventing the calf's offering only to fall face-first into a bovine mother load. Lights, camera…and action! Labour is now doing the two-step but with shoelaces tied together.

Labour has steadfastly refused to acknowledge their complicity in the election overspend. They have floated the idea that even if guilty, they are quite prepared to change law retrospectively to acquit themselves of any legal consequence. The problem from their perspective is not so much how to deal with financial aspect of the overspend but rather, how to manage the strong public distaste for their remedy. It smacks of utter corruption and a perversion of the rule of law.

The rules are pretty clear: political parties may not use taxpayer funds for the purposes of electioneering. That means they must not solicit party or individual MP support. Labour, along with some other parties broke that rule but at least most of the others (National, Maori, Greens, Act and now purportedly even Winston First) have either paid back or intend to pay back their overspend.

None of the parties can claim ignorance of the rules (even if that was a legitimate defense - which it isn't) because the Auditor-General forewarned them in a report issued three months prior to the 2005 election. Most parties inadvertently broke the rules but they also took responsibility for their oversight - other than, at this stage, Labour and one of its supporting parties.

What labour has done, however, is to wage a singularly nasty campaign to obfuscate their own difficulties. Like a bunch of pre-pubescent school kids they jumped in the mud and personalized their attacks, dragging in the private lives of others. They also feigned surprise and indignation at the merest hint of being called corrupt even though that's exactly what many think about their proposed legislative remedy and refusal to entertain the notion of reimbursing the taxpayer.

They threw accusation after accusation against their detractors which, if the latest polls are any guide, are increasing daily. Helen Clark has grown so shrill in her condemnation of National (mainly for being effective as an opposition) that it's hard to avoid the conclusion that this issue (and the Labour response) has hit its mark and will doom this government's remarkable run of luck. Even Teflon eventually wears thin.

Clark's attempt to impregnate the public with an idiotic conspiracy involving the Exclusive Brethren has met with a justifiable disbelief from the public. Sadly for her though, Labour's attempt to fly the idea of going after their religious employment exemptions just look vindictive, nasty and even more despotic.

Similarly, screeching like a spurned housewife that National was selling policies for cash was as stupid as it was unbelievable. Instead they should be much more concerned about the credible charge of Union influence on their policies.

And just when things seemed to have simmered down a bit, Labour's allegations, like a boomerang comes back to hit them right in the goolies: Maori Party Leader Tariana Turia reveals that they turned down a $250,000 election funding offer if they agreed to support Labour.

Now, it seems hard to believe that anyone who was such a strong supporter of Helen Clark would offer such a large sum of money to try and secure political support, would do so without first Okaying it with Labour. That’s like ordering the hors d'oevres before the invites were sent out.

The Maori Party did the honorable thing and spurned the offer. No political party should ever sell its integrity or potential support in such a sleazy and anti-democratic manner. Of course the Labour Party is attempting to distance itself from these fresh allegations but they are very serious indeed. After all, attempting to bribe an MP is considered a corrupt practice under the Crimes Act, and it's hard to see much of a difference between that and bribing a party to support another. Had the election result been a little different (and the money accepted) the funds could have changed the hue of the bottoms now seated on the treasury benches.

Both Labour Party President Mike Williams and Cabinet Minister Maharey have said that they no nothing about the offer. Given the gravity of the accusation I would have expected the Prime minister to have given that assurance. Maybe, just maybe, she couldn't.


ENDS

© Scoop Media

 
 
 
Parliament Headlines | Politics Headlines | Regional Headlines

Scoop 3.0: How You Can Help Scoop’s Evolution

Entering into its third decade of operation, the Scoop news ecosystem is set to undergo another phase of transformation and evolution.

We have big plans for 2018 as we look to expand our public interest journalism coverage, upgrade our publishing infrastructure and offer even more valuable business tools to commercial users of Scoop. More>>

 
 

Speaking Of Transport: Public Engagement On Wellington Scenarios

“Our work on possible solutions for Wellington’s transport future is ongoing, but has progressed to the stage where we’re ready to share our ideas with the public and seek their feedback to help guide our next steps...” More>>

ALSO:

Parental Leave: National's Time-Sharing Change Fails

National has proposed a change to the Parental Leave and Employment Protection Amendment Bill that would allow both parents to take paid parental leave at the same time, if that is what suits them best. More>>

ALSO:

Train Free Thursday: Workers Strike To Defend Terms Of Employment

"They signed up to these conditions a year ago when they got the contract for Wellington's rail services. Now they're trying to increase profits by squeezing frontline workers." More>>

ALSO:

Seclusion: Ombudsman Emphasises Importance Of Monitoring

Disability Rights Commissioner Paula Tesoriero says that while there have been changes to the Education (Update) Amendment Act 2017 to prohibit the use of seclusion, the report is an important reminder of the importance of regular monitoring of schools. More>>

ALSO:

United Future History: "All Good Things Must End"

'We’re extremely proud of what we’ve achieved over the past 15 years, working alongside the government of the day, both National and Labour.' Mr Light told members on Monday. More>>

Gordon Campbell: On The TPP Outcome, And The Hobbit Law

Somehow the Trans Pacific Partnership trade deal has come lurching back from the dead – and as predicted in this column last week, the member countries gathered in Vietnam have announced a deal in broad principle, shunted aside until a later date the stuff on which they don’t agree, and declared victory. More>>

Agreeing To Differ: Greens Maintain Opposition To TPPA
“The Green Party has long opposed the TPPA. The new proposed deal, which came out of the weekend’s talks, still contains key ISDS concessions to corporations that put our democracy at risk, so our position remains the same,” said Green Party trade spokesperson Golriz Ghahraman. More>>

ALSO:

Monitoring Report: A New Chapter For Children’s Rights In New Zealand?

The Children’s Commissioner is calling on the country to embrace children’s rights to ensure their overall well-being. More>>

ALSO:

 
 
 
 
 

LATEST HEADLINES

  • PARLIAMENT
  • POLITICS
  • REGIONAL
 
 

Featured InfoPages

Opening the Election