Gordon Campbell | Parliament TV | Parliament Today | News Video | Crime | Employers | Housing | Immigration | Legal | Local Govt. | Maori | Welfare | Unions | Youth | Search

 

Rugby could be the real victim of section 59


Media release from Parent.org

Rugby could be the real victim of section 59 debate.

Parenting lobby group, Parent.org, urges politicians to consider carefully the consequences of Sue Bradford's bill to repeal Section 59 of the Crimes Act, the "anti-smacking" bill.

"If politicians follow the advice of opponents of repeal and choose to keep or modify Section 59 to define "legal smacking" then they are effectively banning rugby, boxing and other contact sports," states the group's chair, Steve Gore, "unless they enact legislation to offer sports similar protection from prosecution under the Crimes Act".

Opponents of the bill are suggesting that if the Section 59 repeal goes through parents will be criminalised for light smacks or even pulling children back from the road. If this were truly the case then no contact sport could be played as a strong tackle is a much clearer case of assault than a smack and sport doesn't have the protection that section 59 currently gives parents. If parenting can't function without such protection then it is impossible for boxing, rugby, league, soccer, netball, basketball or any sport where opponents regularly contact with each other to continue without similar protection and that would means exhaustively defining each type of tackle or hit.

"The widely applied legal principle of de minimis means that currently those things, such as tackles, which breach the letter of the law but fall within social expectation don't attract prosecution, and this is something that no red blooded Kiwi would want to change, as it would mean the already full rulebook for rugby running to many volumes. Exactly the same thinking should be applied to parents. We expect some parents to occasionally smack their children and prosecutions would follow that expectations. Currently the only service Section 59 offers is as a defence for serious child abuse.

"If section 59 didn't exist our society would be exactly the same as it is now. Given that New Zealand has appalling child abuse and neglect statistics, no MP should be rushing to write or endorse legislation that encourages parents to hit children, which section 59 does. They should be looking for ways to improve parenting, not set in legislation last resort techniques and worst practice, and the opportunity to get rid of section 59 is the first step in that."

Parent.org believes that there is a fundamentally more important reason to repeal the legislation.

"Section 59 is the only legislative direction for parents. In essence it says to the world that we care so little about the skills and knowledge that our parents have that we legally endorse a practice that is, at best, worst practice as no expert on earth would be prepared to say that smacking or physical punishment is the best child rearing method and the one you should try before anything else. Any attempt to modify the legislation to define acceptable physical is making a very clear endorsement of violence as the government endorsed child rearing method."

"The whole argument is getting ridiculous. In reality, good parents smack kids and appalling parents would never dream of touching their kids and this whole issue is such a small part of raising children that it simply shouldn't be on the radar. Our MP's should be focused on how they can improved the parenting environment to help our parents be the best they can, not focus obsessively on the inconsequential."

ENDS

© Scoop Media

 
 
 
Parliament Headlines | Politics Headlines | Regional Headlines

Scoop 3.0: How You Can Help Scoop’s Evolution

Entering into its third decade of operation, the Scoop news ecosystem is set to undergo another phase of transformation and evolution.

We have big plans for 2018 as we look to expand our public interest journalism coverage, upgrade our publishing infrastructure and offer even more valuable business tools to commercial users of Scoop. More>>

 
 

Speaking Of Transport: Public Engagement On Wellington Scenarios

“Our work on possible solutions for Wellington’s transport future is ongoing, but has progressed to the stage where we’re ready to share our ideas with the public and seek their feedback to help guide our next steps...” More>>

ALSO:

Parental Leave: National's Time-Sharing Change Fails

National has proposed a change to the Parental Leave and Employment Protection Amendment Bill that would allow both parents to take paid parental leave at the same time, if that is what suits them best. More>>

ALSO:

Train Free Thursday: Workers Strike To Defend Terms Of Employment

"They signed up to these conditions a year ago when they got the contract for Wellington's rail services. Now they're trying to increase profits by squeezing frontline workers." More>>

ALSO:

Seclusion: Ombudsman Emphasises Importance Of Monitoring

Disability Rights Commissioner Paula Tesoriero says that while there have been changes to the Education (Update) Amendment Act 2017 to prohibit the use of seclusion, the report is an important reminder of the importance of regular monitoring of schools. More>>

ALSO:

United Future History: "All Good Things Must End"

'We’re extremely proud of what we’ve achieved over the past 15 years, working alongside the government of the day, both National and Labour.' Mr Light told members on Monday. More>>

Gordon Campbell: On The TPP Outcome, And The Hobbit Law

Somehow the Trans Pacific Partnership trade deal has come lurching back from the dead – and as predicted in this column last week, the member countries gathered in Vietnam have announced a deal in broad principle, shunted aside until a later date the stuff on which they don’t agree, and declared victory. More>>

Agreeing To Differ: Greens Maintain Opposition To TPPA
“The Green Party has long opposed the TPPA. The new proposed deal, which came out of the weekend’s talks, still contains key ISDS concessions to corporations that put our democracy at risk, so our position remains the same,” said Green Party trade spokesperson Golriz Ghahraman. More>>

ALSO:

Monitoring Report: A New Chapter For Children’s Rights In New Zealand?

The Children’s Commissioner is calling on the country to embrace children’s rights to ensure their overall well-being. More>>

ALSO:

 
 
 
 
 

LATEST HEADLINES

  • PARLIAMENT
  • POLITICS
  • REGIONAL
 
 

Featured InfoPages

Opening the Election