Gordon Campbell | Parliament TV | Parliament Today | News Video | Crime | Employers | Housing | Immigration | Legal | Local Govt. | Maori | Welfare | Unions | Youth | Search


Judgment: Brent John Gilchrist v The Queen

Supreme Court of New Zealand

15 December 2006


Brent John GILCHRIST v The Queen

(SC 69/2006) [2006] NZSC 109


This summary is provided to assist in the understanding of the Court’s judgment. It does not comprise part of the reasons for that judgment.

The full judgment with reasons is the only authoritative document. The full text of the judgment and reasons can be found at www.courtsofnz.govt.nz.

The Supreme Court has unanimously dismissed an appeal against conviction under s 143B of the Tax Administration Act 1994, which relates to tax evasion and similar offences. The appellant, Mr Gilchrist, ran a tax consultancy business called E-Tax Trust which he controlled as sole director of the trustee company for the business.

Between June 2001 and August 2003 GST was not paid in respect of the business. In an attempt to recover tax the Commissioner, on two occasions, used a provision under s 157 of the TAA requiring debtors of the business to pay their debts to the Inland Revenue Department rather than E-Tax Trust.

In July 2003 IRD issued a written notice under s 17 of the TAA requiring the provision of financial information relating to the business. Upon receipt of the notice Mr Gilchrist assigned the debts of the business to a company and then knowingly did not provide the requested information. This was to preempt any further s 157 notice in relation to business debtors. Mr Gilchrist was prosecuted under s 143B(1)(b) of the TAA for knowingly not providing the requested information intending to evade the payment of tax. The Supreme Court rejected Mr Gilchrist’s argument that in the light of the history of the tax laws his conduct did not amount to an offence under the section. The Supreme Court also rejected his argument that the section could only apply in cases where there had been a wilful evasion of assessment and not where a proper assessment had been made but only payment had been evaded.


See... Judgment: Brent John Gilchrist v The Queen

© Scoop Media

Parliament Headlines | Politics Headlines | Regional Headlines

Scoop 3.0: How You Can Help Scoop’s Evolution

Entering into its third decade of operation, the Scoop news ecosystem is set to undergo another phase of transformation and evolution.

We have big plans for 2018 as we look to expand our public interest journalism coverage, upgrade our publishing infrastructure and offer even more valuable business tools to commercial users of Scoop. More>>


Speaking Of Transport: Public Engagement On Wellington Scenarios

“Our work on possible solutions for Wellington’s transport future is ongoing, but has progressed to the stage where we’re ready to share our ideas with the public and seek their feedback to help guide our next steps...” More>>


Parental Leave: National's Time-Sharing Change Fails

National has proposed a change to the Parental Leave and Employment Protection Amendment Bill that would allow both parents to take paid parental leave at the same time, if that is what suits them best. More>>


Train Free Thursday: Workers Strike To Defend Terms Of Employment

"They signed up to these conditions a year ago when they got the contract for Wellington's rail services. Now they're trying to increase profits by squeezing frontline workers." More>>


Seclusion: Ombudsman Emphasises Importance Of Monitoring

Disability Rights Commissioner Paula Tesoriero says that while there have been changes to the Education (Update) Amendment Act 2017 to prohibit the use of seclusion, the report is an important reminder of the importance of regular monitoring of schools. More>>


United Future History: "All Good Things Must End"

'We’re extremely proud of what we’ve achieved over the past 15 years, working alongside the government of the day, both National and Labour.' Mr Light told members on Monday. More>>

Gordon Campbell: On The TPP Outcome, And The Hobbit Law

Somehow the Trans Pacific Partnership trade deal has come lurching back from the dead – and as predicted in this column last week, the member countries gathered in Vietnam have announced a deal in broad principle, shunted aside until a later date the stuff on which they don’t agree, and declared victory. More>>

Agreeing To Differ: Greens Maintain Opposition To TPPA
“The Green Party has long opposed the TPPA. The new proposed deal, which came out of the weekend’s talks, still contains key ISDS concessions to corporations that put our democracy at risk, so our position remains the same,” said Green Party trade spokesperson Golriz Ghahraman. More>>


Monitoring Report: A New Chapter For Children’s Rights In New Zealand?

The Children’s Commissioner is calling on the country to embrace children’s rights to ensure their overall well-being. More>>





Featured InfoPages

Opening the Election