Gordon Campbell | Parliament TV | Parliament Today | News Video | Crime | Employers | Housing | Immigration | Legal | Local Govt. | Maori | Welfare | Unions | Youth | Search

 

New Evidence Reveals Peter Ellis Inquiry A Sham

New Evidence Reveals Peter Ellis Inquiry A Sham

Peterellis.org.nz spokesman Richard Christie reports that new research into the Peter Ellis case casts doubt on the safety of Ellis' convictions. The research reveals that Sir Thomas Eichelbaum's Inquiry was carried out in a manner designed to bury rather than examine doubts previously raised by three of the world's foremost experts on children’s testimony. It calls into question the conduct of officials and has ensured that the case will not be going away anytime soon.

The New Zealand Law Journal recently published a two-part paper entitled New evidence in the Peter Ellis case, [1] by researcher Ross Francis. The author refers to the latest research into child sexual abuse and cites documents which have been released only in the last year.

Ross Francis exposes the lengths to which the then Attorney-General, the Hon Margaret Wilson, went in order to prevent an inquiry into the Peter Ellis case. Wilson’s efforts may have been a factor in Cabinet’s decision to establish a ministerial inquiry rather than a Commission of Inquiry.

The research paper exposes how the ministerial inquiry was manipulated by Justice Ministry officials, in particular by its then-chief legal counsel Val Sim. Among the new revelations:

  • Eichelbaum accepted Sim’s advice to “discount” Sir Thomas Thorp’s Opinion for the Secretary for Justice [2] (1999) regarding the case. Thorp had expressed strong concern about the case. On Sim’s advice Thorp’s report was not publicly released until after Eichelbaum’s report had been released.
  • Eichelbaum accepted Sim’s advice to reject three of the world’s leading experts on child testimony, each of whom had been nominated by Ellis’ legal counsel.
  • Eichelbaum accepted Sim’s advice to reject any expert who had a “close publishing history” with each of the experts nominated by Ellis’ counsel.
  • Eichelbaum accepted Sim’s advice to talk to American law professor Thomas Lyon. Lyon’s views in regard to child sexual abuse have been subject to strong academic criticism.
  • The name of Louise Sas, a little-known Canadian psychologist and child advocate, was supplied to Eichelbaum. The Justice Ministry has been unable to explain how Sas’ name came to his attention. None of the parties to the inquiry nominated Sas
  • Sas had published no peer-reviewed research on the interviewing of child abuse victims yet Val Sim and officials led Eichelbaum to believe that she had “high standing”.
  • Officials advised Phil Goff that “about six” experts were likely to be appointed as advisors to the inquiry. Although Eichelbaum was aware of this advice, he selected only two experts.
  • Eichelbaum advised the then Justice Minister, the Hon Phil Goff, that both international experts believed the children’s evidence was reliable. That was incorrect. He also claimed that allegations arising out of the conviction children’s later interviews generally did not result in charges. That too, was incorrect.
  • Justice Ministry officials cannot produce a number of important and sensitive documents pertaining to the Peter Ellis case.

Ministry officials, orchestrated by Val Sim, interfered with Eichelbaum’s inquiry to such an extent that justice has not been done. The inquiry did not properly examine the issues that motivated its establishment and that had so concerned Sir Thomas Thorp in his advice to the Secretary for Justice. The process, which involved clear bias and conflicts of interest, was a sham.

A Royal commission of inquiry into the case must be urgently conducted.

[1] < http://www.peterellis.org.nz/docs/2007/new_evidence.pdf>

[2] < http://www.peterellis.org.nz/docs/1999/Thorp/index.htm>

ENDS

© Scoop Media

 
 
 
Parliament Headlines | Politics Headlines | Regional Headlines

Scoop 3.0: How You Can Help Scoop’s Evolution

Entering into its third decade of operation, the Scoop news ecosystem is set to undergo another phase of transformation and evolution.

We have big plans for 2018 as we look to expand our public interest journalism coverage, upgrade our publishing infrastructure and offer even more valuable business tools to commercial users of Scoop. More>>

 
 

Speaking Of Transport: Public Engagement On Wellington Scenarios

“Our work on possible solutions for Wellington’s transport future is ongoing, but has progressed to the stage where we’re ready to share our ideas with the public and seek their feedback to help guide our next steps...” More>>

ALSO:

Parental Leave: National's Time-Sharing Change Fails

National has proposed a change to the Parental Leave and Employment Protection Amendment Bill that would allow both parents to take paid parental leave at the same time, if that is what suits them best. More>>

ALSO:

Train Free Thursday: Workers Strike To Defend Terms Of Employment

"They signed up to these conditions a year ago when they got the contract for Wellington's rail services. Now they're trying to increase profits by squeezing frontline workers." More>>

ALSO:

Seclusion: Ombudsman Emphasises Importance Of Monitoring

Disability Rights Commissioner Paula Tesoriero says that while there have been changes to the Education (Update) Amendment Act 2017 to prohibit the use of seclusion, the report is an important reminder of the importance of regular monitoring of schools. More>>

ALSO:

United Future History: "All Good Things Must End"

'We’re extremely proud of what we’ve achieved over the past 15 years, working alongside the government of the day, both National and Labour.' Mr Light told members on Monday. More>>

Gordon Campbell: On The TPP Outcome, And The Hobbit Law

Somehow the Trans Pacific Partnership trade deal has come lurching back from the dead – and as predicted in this column last week, the member countries gathered in Vietnam have announced a deal in broad principle, shunted aside until a later date the stuff on which they don’t agree, and declared victory. More>>

Agreeing To Differ: Greens Maintain Opposition To TPPA
“The Green Party has long opposed the TPPA. The new proposed deal, which came out of the weekend’s talks, still contains key ISDS concessions to corporations that put our democracy at risk, so our position remains the same,” said Green Party trade spokesperson Golriz Ghahraman. More>>

ALSO:

Monitoring Report: A New Chapter For Children’s Rights In New Zealand?

The Children’s Commissioner is calling on the country to embrace children’s rights to ensure their overall well-being. More>>

ALSO:

 
 
 
 
 

LATEST HEADLINES

  • PARLIAMENT
  • POLITICS
  • REGIONAL
 
 

Featured InfoPages

Opening the Election