Gordon Campbell | Parliament TV | Parliament Today | News Video | Crime | Employers | Housing | Immigration | Legal | Local Govt. | Maori | Welfare | Unions | Youth | Search


ETS Change Puts Major Pressure on Carbon Currency

ETS Change Puts Major Pressure on New Carbon Currency

Media Statement – 8 May 2008

The new carbon currency proposed under the Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS) is likely to come under major pressure as a result of the two-year delay on charges to apply to transport fuels announced by the Government.

The change will cut demand for the new carbon currency, the NZU, as one-third fewer carbon credits will now be required to be surrendered to the Government over the first five years of the scheme, and this could significantly reduce what the NZU will sell for. Only if Kyoto forest owners stay away in droves from the ETS, or the Government props up the new carbon currency with taxpayer funds, will the squeeze on its value be avoided. Any drop in the value of the NZU will directly reduce the earnings forest owners can achieve for the carbon their trees absorb. The change provides further reason to dump the idea of creating the NZU and to use instead just the international carbon currencies already created by the Kyoto Protocol.

While the delay in applying emission charges to transport fuels will reduce costs to road users by a billion dollars, households, SMEs and road users will still carry over 90% of the net charges resulting from the ETS up to 2013. Under the scheme’s original rules, these groups that generate only a third of the nations emissions would have paid 91% of the charges. They will now pay 92%.

The new set of Kyoto accounts, which the Government says have reduced the Kyoto deficit to half its previous level, does not alter the Sustainability Council’s estimate that the ETS will reduce gross emissions by less than 2% over the first five years of the scheme. The Sustainability Council will be presenting this update on its recently released report, The Carbon Challenge, when it appears before a Parliamentary select committee today.

The delay in putting a price on emissions from transport fuels is disappointing because the scheme is already far too reliant on promises that something will happen in the distant political future, when the time to start to apply charges is now. There is no case for delaying the time at which road users begin to pay their share of the Kyoto bill. However, the amount they would have to pay each year could be reduced very significantly if agricultural producers and the major emitters also paid their fair share, starting at the same time.

The fair and efficient way forward is for everyone to face a charge on the same proportion of their emissions, at each point in time, with that proportion rising over time along a progressively-rising ramp. What we have instead is a scheme that allows most sectors to start late, and provides blanket subsides to major emitters and the agriculture sector, rather than case by case consideration of transitional assistance for individual producers. The Kyoto bill is not going away. Rather than trying to put off paying it, the focus needs to go on beginning early and securing broad agreement around the starting point and slope of the ramp.


© Scoop Media

Parliament Headlines | Politics Headlines | Regional Headlines

Another Leader Exiting: Statement From Peter Dunne

I have concluded, based on recent polling, and other soundings I have been taking over the last few weeks, that, the volatility and uncertainty notwithstanding, there is now a mood amongst Ōhāriu voters for a change of MP, which is unlikely to alter...

“I have therefore decided that it is time for me to stand aside, so the people of Ōhāriu can elect a new electorate MP. More>>


Gordon Campbell: On Labour’s Campaign Launch

One of the key motifs of Ardern’s speech was her repeated use of the phrase – “Now, what?” Cleverly, that looks like being Labour’s response to National’s ‘steady as it goes’ warning against not putting the economic ‘gains’ at risk. More>>


Lyndon Hood: Social Welfare, Explained

Speaking as someone who has seen better times and nowadays mostly operates by being really annoying and humiliating to deal with, I have some fellow feeling with the current system, so I’ll take this chance to set a few things straight.. More>>


Deregistered: Independent Board Decision On Family First

The Board considers that Family First has a purpose to promote its own particular views about marriage and the traditional family that cannot be determined to be for the public benefit in a way previously accepted as charitable... More>>


Transport Policies: Nats' New $10.5bn Roads Of National Significance

National is committing to the next generation of Roads of National Significance, National Party Transport Spokesperson Simon Bridges says. More>>


Gordon Campbell: On Why Labour Isn’t Responsible For Barnaby Joyce

As a desperate Turnbull government tries to treat the Barnaby Joyce affair as a Pauline Hanson fever dream – blame it on the foreigners! We’re the victims of the dastardly New Zealand Labour Party! – our own government has chosen to further that narrative, and make itself an accomplice. More>>


Rail: Greens Back Tauranga – Hamilton – Auckland Service

The Green Party today announced that it will trial a passenger rail service between Auckland, Hamilton and Tauranga starting in 2019, when it is in government. More>>


Housing: Voluntary Rental Warrant Of Fitness For Wellington

Wellington City Council is partnering with the University of Otago, Wellington, to launch a voluntary Rental Warrant of Fitness for minimum housing standards in Wellington, Mayor Justin Lester has announced. More>>





Featured InfoPages

Opening the Election