Gordon Campbell | Parliament TV | Parliament Today | News Video | Crime | Employers | Housing | Immigration | Legal | Local Govt. | Maori | Welfare | Unions | Youth | Search

 


Tribunal finds ACC inconsistent w Bill of Rights

Human Rights Commission
Media Release
Monday, 19 May,

Tribunal finds ACC inconsistent with Bill of Rights

A human rights tribunal ruling has found that a section of Accident Compensation law is inconsistent with the right to freedom from discrimination as affirmed in the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act, 1990.

If unchallenged, the decision means the Minister for Accident Compensation Maryan Street will have to report to Parliament on how to address the inconsistency.

The decision was in response to a claim by plaintiff John Howard before the Human Rights Review Tribunal in Wellington on 15 May.

Mr Howard suffered an arm injury that required weekly compensation and vocational rehabilitation. When he became eligible for superannuation weekly compensation halted. Mr Howard had no issue with that, but maintained that he should continue to receive vocational rehabilitation. He felt the end of vocational rehabilitation hampered his ability to seek further work and constituted discrimination on the grounds of his age.

This is the first time that the Tribunal has made a declaration of inconsistency since the Human Rights Act was amended to allow them in 2001.

In welcoming the decision Chief Human Rights Commissioner Rosslyn Noonan said, “This decision is a landmark in human rights law in that it shows how any New Zealander can challenge legislation they believe to be discriminatory and impacts upon them adversely.”

The decision concludes, “We are satisfied that the challenged legislation (s.85 and cl.52 of the Injury Prevention Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2001) is inconsistent with the right to freedom from discrimination affirmed by section 19 of the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990 and is not within any reasonable limit to that freedom as can be demonstrably justified in a free and democratic society.”

The Human Rights Review Tribunal hears human rights cases and is the jurisdictional equivalent of a district court. The Crown has the right to appeal the decision.


ENDS

© Scoop Media

 
 
 
 
 
Parliament Headlines | Politics Headlines | Regional Headlines

 

PARLIAMENT TODAY:

Arming Police: Frontline Police To Routinely Carry Tasers

"In making the decision, the Police executive has considered almost five years worth of 'use of force' data… It consistently shows that the Taser is one of the least injury-causing tactical options available when compared with other options, with a subject injury rate of just over one per cent for all deployments." More>>

ALSO:

Gordon Campbell: On D-Day For Dairy At The TPP

While New Zealand may feel flattered at being called “the Saudi Arabia of milk” it would be more accurate to regard us as the suicide bombers of free trade. More>>

ALSO:

Leaked Letter: Severe Restrictions on State Owned Enterprises

Even an SOE that exists to fulfil a public function neglected by the market or which is a natural monopoly would nevertheless be forced to act "on the basis of commercial considerations" and would be prohibited from discriminating in favour of local businesses in purchases and sales. Foreign companies would be given standing to sue SOEs in domestic courts for perceived departures from the strictures of the TPP... More>>

ALSO:

"Gutted" Safety Bill: Time To Listen To Workplace Victims’ Families

Labour has listened to the families of whose loved ones have been killed at work and calls on other political parties to back its proposals to make workplaces safer and prevent unnecessary deaths on the job. More>>

ALSO:

Regulators: Govt To ‘Crowd-Source’ Regulatory Advice

A wide-ranging set of reforms is to be implemented to shake up the way New Zealand government agencies develop, write and implement regulations. More>>

ALSO:

Board Appointments: Some Minister Appoint Less The 3 In 10 Women

“It’s 2015 not 1915: Ministers who appoint less than 3 in 10 women to their boards must do better, they have no excuse but to do better,” said Dr Blue. More>>

Gordon Campbell: On The 1990s Retro Proposals For Our Health System

As we learned yesterday, the reviews propose that the democratically elected representation on DHBs should be reduced, such that community wishes will be able to be over-ridden by political appointees. In today’s revelations, the reviews also propose a return to the destructive competitive health model of the 1990s. More>>

ALSO:

Get More From Scoop

 

LATEST HEADLINES

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Politics
Search Scoop  
 
 
Powered by Vodafone
NZ independent news