Gordon Campbell | Parliament TV | Parliament Today | News Video | Crime | Employers | Housing | Immigration | Legal | Local Govt. | Maori | Welfare | Unions | Youth | Search


Judgment: Z v Dental Complaints Assessmt Committee

Supreme Court of New Zealand

25 July 2008


Z v Dental Complaints Assessment Committee

SC 22/2007 [2008] NZSC 55


This summary is provided to assist in the understanding of the Court’s judgment. It does not comprise part of the reasons for that judgment.

The full judgment with reasons is the only authoritative document. The full text of the judgment and reasons can be found at www.courtsofnz.govt.nz.

The Supreme Court has today delivered judgment in an appeal by a dentist against a Court of Appeal decision allowing disciplinary charges to be heard by the Dentists Disciplinary Tribunal. The dentist had argued that because the incidents giving rise to the charges had already been the subject of a criminal trial, the disciplinary proceedings were an abuse of the Tribunal’s powers. The Court has, by a majority, dismissed the appeal in respect of two disciplinary charges but held that a third should not proceed.

The dentist, whose name has been suppressed, was acquitted of indecent assault against three patients in the District Court in 2002. A Dental Complaints Assessment Committee later investigated the dentist’s conduct on those occasions as well as the conduct that was the subject of another complaint. The Committee brought charges of professional misconduct which covered the alleged indecent assaults as well as alleged administration of excessive dosages of sedatives on those occasions. The dentist submitted that the inclusion of particulars relating to indecent assaults which had been addressed at the trial was an abuse of process.

The majority of the Supreme Court (comprising Blanchard, Tipping, McGrath and Anderson JJ) has held that it is not an abuse of process for the charges in relation to two of the complainants to be heard by the Tribunal. The allegations of indecent conduct there form part only of a charge that addresses wider issues, in particular, over-use of sedatives by the dentist in practice.

The majority judges have also decided that the standard of proof to be applied by the Tribunal when hearing the disciplinary charges is the civil standard of balance of probabilities and not the criminal standard of beyond reasonable doubt.

The Chief Justice has dissented on both points, taking the view that none of the disciplinary charges should proceed in this case because disciplinary bodies should not consider a charge which alleges a crime without proper justification. The Chief Justice has also concluded that the criminal standard should apply to proof of all charges of serious misconduct being heard by the Dentists Disciplinary Tribunal.

See... Judgment: Z v Dental Complaints Assessment Committee

© Scoop Media

Parliament Headlines | Politics Headlines | Regional Headlines

Gordon Campbell: On DHB Deficits And Free Trade

Currently the world is looking on aghast at the Trump administration’s plans to slash Obamacare, mainly in order to finance massive tax changes that will deliver most of their gains to the wealthy. Lives will be lost in the trade-off. Millions of Americans stand to lose access to the healthcare they need.

Spot the difference with New Zealand, where DHBs are under intense pressure to reduce deficits within a climate of chronic underfunding. More>>


Greens' Response: Slum-Like Rentals Exposed In Renting Review

“...The grim findings of the review are a wakeup call about the true state of rentals in this country. Too many renters are festering in slum-like conditions under the thumb of landlords who have largely unchecked powers and ignore tenants’ complaints when it suits them.” More>>


Gordon Campbell: On The Life And Times Of Peter Dunne

The unkind might talk of sinking ships, others could be more reminded of a loaded revolver left on the desk by his Cabinet colleagues as they closed the door behind them, now that the polls in Ohariu had confirmed he was no longer of much use to National. More>>


Gordon Campbell: On Labour’s Campaign Launch

One of the key motifs of Ardern’s speech was her repeated use of the phrase – “Now, what?” Cleverly, that looks like being Labour’s response to National’s ‘steady as it goes’ warning against not putting the economic ‘gains’ at risk. More>>


Lyndon Hood: Social Welfare, Explained

Speaking as someone who has seen better times and nowadays mostly operates by being really annoying and humiliating to deal with, I have some fellow feeling with the current system, so I’ll take this chance to set a few things straight.. More>>


Deregistered: Independent Board Decision On Family First

The Board considers that Family First has a purpose to promote its own particular views about marriage and the traditional family that cannot be determined to be for the public benefit in a way previously accepted as charitable... More>>


Transport Policies: Nats' New $10.5bn Roads Of National Significance

National is committing to the next generation of Roads of National Significance, National Party Transport Spokesperson Simon Bridges says. More>>





Featured InfoPages

Opening the Election