Gordon Campbell | Parliament TV | Parliament Today | News Video | Crime | Employers | Housing | Immigration | Legal | Local Govt. | Maori | Welfare | Unions | Youth | Search

 

Towards a New Veterans' Entitlements Scheme

The Law Commission today released an Issues Paper for consultation "Towards a New Veterans’ Entitlements Scheme: A Discussion paper on a Review of the War Pensions Act 1954". Attached is a speech from Sir Geoffrey Palmer.


The Issues Paper is available from the Law Commission's website www.lawcom.govt.nz


--


Remarks at Launch of the Law Commission Issues Paper “Towards a New Veterans’ Entitlements Scheme: A Discussion Paper on a Review of the War Pensions Act 1954”


Rt Hon Sir Geoffrey Palmer

President, Law Commission


31 July 2008


In September 2007, the Government gave the Law Commission a reference on the War Pensions Act 1954. I must confess that my knowledge of the War Pensions Act at that time was very limited. My only brief foray into this area of law was at the time when the Accident Compensation Scheme was being considered – now nearly 40 years ago.

The strange thing is that the immense change that the introduction of ACC made to the injury compensation landscape in New Zealand should have significantly impacted the War Pensions Act. But the issues never seemed to have been fully considered in relation to war pensions. This is the source of some of the problems with the current War Pensions Act.

Since the Law Commission began working on this project, it has become indisputably clear to me that the War Pensions Act is in desperate need of review. Although the Act served veterans of the two World Wars quite well for many years, the needs of veterans has now changed. And society itself has also changed.

The Act is now out of date. It is not going too far to say that it is very bad legislation indeed by modern standards. That is not to say that the scheme itself is bad, but simply that the legislation behind it is bad.

The first problem is the drafting. It is an old statute and it is not written in plain English. This means there is little chance that those who claim under it can understand it properly. The Act also poses formidable challenges for those who administer it. It is not a piece of legislation that yields up its secrets easily.

There is another problem. The War Pensions Act has been changed over the years. For the best of motives the RSA and governments have tried to keep it up-to-date. But there have now been so many piecemeal changes that they often do not make sense. Much of the legislation is unclear.

Furthermore the War Pensions Act concentrates on physical injuries in a war environment. The problems of modern veterans, especially those affected by such things as post traumatic stress disorder or environmental hazards, are not adequately dealt with under the statute.

As mentioned, the fact that this Act has not been updated in the face of major changes such as the introduction of ACC, has been problematic. Let me just give you one example of the injustice that the failure to revise this statute over the years has caused. The funeral grants paid for veterans are worth $2,152.03. There are conditions attached to this. The accident compensation benefit is much more generous. Where someone dies as a result of an injury and is covered under the Accident Compensation scheme, a funeral allowance of up to $5,101 is paid and there are no conditions attached to it.

Many other anomalies could be cited in this strange and ungainly piece of legislation.

This Act is cumbersome to administer. It does not set out criteria for decision-making, but in many cases leaves decisions to discretion. The claims and decision-making processes could be far more accessible and transparent.

The Law Commission thinks that the War Pensions Act needs to be thoroughly revised.

Even if the present Act were drafted in plain language without any policy changes at all, it would be an enormous improvement.

But the Law Commission is aware that it will be necessary to review and take submissions on the whole of the policy in the Act in order to ensure that we have a fair and robust scheme that adequately meets the needs of our veterans. There are a vast number of issues that need to be explored if we are to give this area of law the thorough revision that it needs. That is why we have written a relatively long Issues Paper of 280 pages.

We have tried to canvass all of the relevant issues in detail so we can get to the bottom of them and provide an Act that will endure for another 50 years.

In designing new legislation to last many years, it is necessary to take into account the future.

The nature of our Armed Forces has changed a lot. There has been increasing diversity in the New Zealand Defence Force, both within the Force itself and in the numerous activities and duties they are required to carry. The experiences of military personnel in being sent to situations of conflict and risk differ markedly from what the majority of our older veterans experienced.

How these new veterans should be assisted and have their position in society respected and honoured is an important issue going forward. New legislation must meet the needs of service personnel who have served in these modern conflicts.

At the same time we must honour those veterans who are now becoming elderly, particularly the veterans of World War II. Their average age is now around 85. The new legislation will need to make sure that the rights and entitlements of our elderly veterans are brought up to a modern standard.

Reconciling the obligations of the past with the needs of the future may turn out to be a difficult task for the next phase of the Law Commission’s work. It may be necessary to have two new statutes, rather than one, in order to take account of the different positions of these two groups.

That has certainly been the case with the law reform that has occurred in the United Kingdom, Australia and Canada. All three countries have introduced new veterans’ schemes in recent years and have maintained any existing scheme for older veterans.

The Law Commission welcomes submissions on this Issues Paper. We are keen to hear the views of veterans and others on the policy issues and possible options which we have raised in the paper.

I must say I have enjoyed this voyage through a legal curiosity. It is necessary to remember, however, that this is an important statute. The current appropriation is around $300m a year.

The Law Commission hopes to make a positive contribution to a better system of entitlements for veterans in the future. It is necessary to ensure that the statute is doing justice to an important segment of the New Zealand community.


ENDS

© Scoop Media

 
 
 
 
 
Parliament Headlines | Politics Headlines | Regional Headlines

Back Again: Government Approves TPP11 Mandate

The Government has approved a negotiating mandate for Trans-Pacific Partnership 11 (TPP11), which will ensure New Zealand businesses remain competitive in overseas markets.

Trade Minister Todd McClay says New Zealand will be pushing for the minimal number of changes possible to the original TPP agreement, something that the remaining TPP11 countries have agreed on. More>>

ALSO:

.

 
 

Gordon Campbell: On Why Labour Isn’t Responsible For Barnaby Joyce

As a desperate Turnbull government tries to treat the Barnaby Joyce affair as a Pauline Hanson fever dream – blame it on the foreigners! We’re the victims of the dastardly New Zealand Labour Party! – our own government has chosen to further that narrative, and make itself an accomplice. More>>

ALSO:

Rail: Greens Back Tauranga – Hamilton – Auckland Service

The Green Party today announced that it will trial a passenger rail service between Auckland, Hamilton and Tauranga starting in 2019, when it is in government. More>>

ALSO:

Housing: Voluntary Rental Warrant Of Fitness For Wellington

Wellington City Council is partnering with the University of Otago, Wellington, to launch a voluntary Rental Warrant of Fitness for minimum housing standards in Wellington, Mayor Justin Lester has announced. More>>

ALSO:

Treaty: Agreement In Principle Signed With Moriori

“The Crown acknowledges Moriori was left virtually landless from 1870, hindering its cultural, social and economic development. The Crown also acknowledges its contribution to the myths that the people of Moriori were racially inferior and became extinct." More>>

ALSO:

Susan Devoy: Call For Inquiry Into State Abuse Reaches UN

Race Relations Commissioner Dame Susan Devoy is in Geneva and has asked a United Nations committee to urge the New Zealand government to initiate an inquiry into the physical and sexual abuse of children and disabled people held in state institutions. More>>

ALSO:

(Not National): Cross-Party Agreement On Pike River Re-Entry

The commitment was signed this afternoon by the leaders of Labour, United Future, The Maori Party, and the Green Party and, together with the earlier commitment by New Zealand First, means that there is now a Parliamentary majority behind the families’ fight for truth and justice. More>>

ALSO:

Earlier:

 
 
 
 
 
 

LATEST HEADLINES

  • PARLIAMENT
  • POLITICS
  • REGIONAL
 
 

Featured InfoPages

Opening the Election