Gordon Campbell | Parliament TV | Parliament Today | News Video | Crime | Employers | Housing | Immigration | Legal | Local Govt. | Maori | Welfare | Unions | Youth | Search

 

Governing For The Good: New Paper


media release
Embargoed until 21 August 2008

Governing For The Good: New Paper From Maxim Institute

The proper role of government is to protect the common good from harm, says Governing for the Good: What does it really mean? a discussion paper released today by Maxim Institute.

“Good government is one that is limited in its functions and responsibilities,” says Steve Thomas, author of the paper. “The role of the government should be limited to protecting the common good from harm, allowing people to pursue the good as indicated by the proper custom and tradition of a society.”

The discussion paper is the first in a series which “considers the basis for a just, fair and compassionate taxation system for New Zealand.” Governing for the Good provides an overview of the roles and responsibilities of government and the community, and the relationship between them.

“Understanding what government should do has clear implications for taxation,” says Mr Thomas. “Currently the level of tax collected is high, and it funds a high level of government spending. This reflects our reliance on the government to provide not only essential services, but to intervene in almost every aspect of the community. It reveals that government is doing more than it should.”

New Zealand is one of the most heavily taxed countries in the developed world, and core Crown expenses are expected to increase from $54 billion in 2007 to $69.9 billion by 2012. While tax cuts will be implemented later this year, there is little sign of any reduction of public spending.

“This level of taxation and spending, and common views of government, show that it has gone beyond protecting the common good to trying to promote a particular vision of the good,” says Thomas.

“This is shown by central government giving increasing direction to the community at large, for example by incentivising personal savings through KiwiSaver, redistributing income through Working for Families, and intervening in family life through the section 59 legislation that criminalised reasonable, non-abuse physical discipline. Yet this intrusion has largely been accepted by society.”

“Rather than looking to the community, many people’s first inclination is to turn immediately to the government to solve a problem,” says Mr Thomas. “However, there are a number of functions that communities do better than government. For example, government cannot provide care and compassion to people that need it in the same way that their families and neighbours can.”

”Debates about the level of taxation and tax cuts are healthy, but we also need to ask the deeper questions that underpin these issues: such as what is the proper role of government? What is the role and responsibility of communities? Exploring questions such as these is crucial to ensure we have a strong society,” says Steve Thomas.

“The government should be socially minded, and should step in where necessary when a community needs help. However such intervention should be for a limited time only, and should seek to enable the community to become take responsibility for its own affairs again. Government should not absorb the functions of civil society, but rather foster a culture where communities can flourish and take responsibility for themselves.”

ENDS

Maxim Institute is an independent research and public policy think tank, incorporated as a charitable trust, www.maxim.org.nz.

© Scoop Media

 
 
 
 
 
Parliament Headlines | Politics Headlines | Regional Headlines

Gordon Campbell: On DHB Deficits And Free Trade

Currently the world is looking on aghast at the Trump administration’s plans to slash Obamacare, mainly in order to finance massive tax changes that will deliver most of their gains to the wealthy. Lives will be lost in the trade-off. Millions of Americans stand to lose access to the healthcare they need.

Spot the difference with New Zealand, where DHBs are under intense pressure to reduce deficits within a climate of chronic underfunding. More>>

 
 

Greens' Response: Slum-Like Rentals Exposed In Renting Review

“...The grim findings of the review are a wakeup call about the true state of rentals in this country. Too many renters are festering in slum-like conditions under the thumb of landlords who have largely unchecked powers and ignore tenants’ complaints when it suits them.” More>>

ALSO:

Gordon Campbell: On The Life And Times Of Peter Dunne

The unkind might talk of sinking ships, others could be more reminded of a loaded revolver left on the desk by his Cabinet colleagues as they closed the door behind them, now that the polls in Ohariu had confirmed he was no longer of much use to National. More>>

ALSO:

Gordon Campbell: On Labour’s Campaign Launch

One of the key motifs of Ardern’s speech was her repeated use of the phrase – “Now, what?” Cleverly, that looks like being Labour’s response to National’s ‘steady as it goes’ warning against not putting the economic ‘gains’ at risk. More>>

ALSO:

Lyndon Hood: Social Welfare, Explained

Speaking as someone who has seen better times and nowadays mostly operates by being really annoying and humiliating to deal with, I have some fellow feeling with the current system, so I’ll take this chance to set a few things straight.. More>>

ALSO:

Deregistered: Independent Board Decision On Family First

The Board considers that Family First has a purpose to promote its own particular views about marriage and the traditional family that cannot be determined to be for the public benefit in a way previously accepted as charitable... More>>

ALSO:

Transport Policies: Nats' New $10.5bn Roads Of National Significance

National is committing to the next generation of Roads of National Significance, National Party Transport Spokesperson Simon Bridges says. More>>

ALSO:

 
 
 
 
 
 

LATEST HEADLINES

  • PARLIAMENT
  • POLITICS
  • REGIONAL
 
 

Featured InfoPages

Opening the Election