Gordon Campbell | Parliament TV | Parliament Today | News Video | Crime | Employers | Housing | Immigration | Legal | Local Govt. | Maori | Welfare | Unions | Youth | Search

 

Fisheries Ministry Motives Questioned

September 2008

Fisheries Ministry Motives Questioned Amidst Sustainability Risks


Non-commercial fishing representatives, both amateur and customary, are raising concerns about the Ministry of Fisheries’ motives in rushing legislation through Parliament before the election.

They have also expressed concerns about the Ministry’s amendment process. An exclusive group of industry, Treasury and Ministry officials developed the amendment without input from environmental and non-commercial groups.

A significant change to section 13 of the Fisheries Act 1996 has been proposed, which will legalise Ministry practices of setting the total allowable catch for all fish stocks without first accurately knowing how many fish there are in the water. This practice has been held illegal by the High Court.

The total allowable catch of a fish stock is the primary sustainability measure set before non-commercial interests are allowed for, and prior to deciding any commercial allocation.

Demands were made at a recent Hui of the mid north iwi fisheries forum, the Hokianga Accord, for a more open and democratic process before making such a significant change to the Act.

After the Hui Accord spokesperson Paul Haddon said, “Ministry staff were left in no doubt that our fisheries resources are for all New Zealanders, yet commercial overfishing has put fish stocks at serious risk. There must be proper consultation before any changes are made that will adversely affect the public’s fishing interests. Non-commercial fishing representatives will not be shut out from any Ministry-driven proposals for change”.

President of the NZ Big Game Fishing Council, Richard Baker, added, “All New Zealanders were promised rebuilds in severely depleted fisheries at the introduction of the quota management system in 1986. Twenty-two years later we are still waiting for fish numbers to improve. It is unacceptable that the Ministry and our politicians now want to legalise setting maximum harvest strategies with minimal information”.

Scott Macindoe, spokesperson for option4, has further doubts. “Our major fish stocks, including the prized snapper, have suffered through the use of poor information. Future managers will find themselves under unrelenting pressure to set maximum commercial catch levels at the expense of the Minister’s statutory obligation of managing fisheries to enable people to provide for their social and cultural wellbeing. All New Zealanders are entitled to have access to adequate size and numbers of fish. This will only occur if the Minister puts sustainability first.”

Non-commercial representatives are determined to work together to ensure sustainability, increase public awareness of this issue and avoid international condemnation of fisheries management in New Zealand.

ENDS


For more information:
Web page www.option4.co.nz/Fisheries_Mgmt/section13.htm

Website www.nzbgfc.org.nz New Zealand Big Game Fishing Council
Website www.option4.co.nz option4 lobby group
Website www.HokiangaAccord.co.nz Hokianga Accord fisheries

FAQ_Fisheries_Amendment_Bill.pdf

© Scoop Media

 
 
 
 
 
Parliament Headlines | Politics Headlines | Regional Headlines

Gordon Campbell: On DHB Deficits And Free Trade

Currently the world is looking on aghast at the Trump administration’s plans to slash Obamacare, mainly in order to finance massive tax changes that will deliver most of their gains to the wealthy. Lives will be lost in the trade-off. Millions of Americans stand to lose access to the healthcare they need.

Spot the difference with New Zealand, where DHBs are under intense pressure to reduce deficits within a climate of chronic underfunding. More>>

 
 

Greens' Response: Slum-Like Rentals Exposed In Renting Review

“...The grim findings of the review are a wakeup call about the true state of rentals in this country. Too many renters are festering in slum-like conditions under the thumb of landlords who have largely unchecked powers and ignore tenants’ complaints when it suits them.” More>>

ALSO:

Gordon Campbell: On The Life And Times Of Peter Dunne

The unkind might talk of sinking ships, others could be more reminded of a loaded revolver left on the desk by his Cabinet colleagues as they closed the door behind them, now that the polls in Ohariu had confirmed he was no longer of much use to National. More>>

ALSO:

Gordon Campbell: On Labour’s Campaign Launch

One of the key motifs of Ardern’s speech was her repeated use of the phrase – “Now, what?” Cleverly, that looks like being Labour’s response to National’s ‘steady as it goes’ warning against not putting the economic ‘gains’ at risk. More>>

ALSO:

Lyndon Hood: Social Welfare, Explained

Speaking as someone who has seen better times and nowadays mostly operates by being really annoying and humiliating to deal with, I have some fellow feeling with the current system, so I’ll take this chance to set a few things straight.. More>>

ALSO:

Deregistered: Independent Board Decision On Family First

The Board considers that Family First has a purpose to promote its own particular views about marriage and the traditional family that cannot be determined to be for the public benefit in a way previously accepted as charitable... More>>

ALSO:

Transport Policies: Nats' New $10.5bn Roads Of National Significance

National is committing to the next generation of Roads of National Significance, National Party Transport Spokesperson Simon Bridges says. More>>

ALSO:

 
 
 
 
 
 

LATEST HEADLINES

  • PARLIAMENT
  • POLITICS
  • REGIONAL
 
 

Featured InfoPages

Opening the Election